Miro is fundamental for innovation
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
We use Miro to support our entire innovation process from fact finding to problem definition to ideation to work planning. Typically these are facilitator-led contexts, but we also use it for journey mapping or research synthesis which may be done by individual practitioners. It's essential for every form of innovation in our organization.
Pros
- Collaboration
- Documentation
- Workshops
Cons
- Embedded AI (e.g. idea generation, auto-synthesis)
- Usability for less tech savvy users
- Design capabilities (gradients, transparencies, and other design tools)
- Reduced expenses for workshops that would otherwise have to be face-to-face
- Net revenue impact for successful projects planned via Miro
Yes. It has allowed us to achieve CO2 reduction objectives by reducing the need for distributed teams to congregate in a single location for workshop participation. It allows us to leverage workshops more readily and has led to more successful projects. It has personally allowed me to operate more or less entirely offsite, which is a more efficient use of my own time.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation