TestComplete is great to use
August 23, 2017

TestComplete is great to use

Annette Levin Dybdahl | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source

Overall Satisfaction with TestComplete

We use it for QUI test in our software. We have several test departments in the company but we are the only one using it. The other departments use other systems, so we don't have a strategy for what products to use.
  • TestComplete is good at making changes in the QUI visible right at once
  • TestComplete gives more decipline in the development department. The developers need to be aware that changes in object naming have an influence on the automated test
  • We have a lot of manual testing, but we can save time by automating the tests that don't involve direct hardware interaction
  • Namemapping. From time to time TestComplete fails due to object names. Making changes in namemapping is hard to do as well as risky.
  • The help files. All examples are scripts. I would like to see more examples directed for the people that do not script testcases, but record them
We have minimized our manual test period. We trust in TestComplete and it is really good to have a tool that you just can run and then get a result.
We use TestComplete as regression test of our system. We run it every night and it gives a clear image of changes that have been made since yesterday.
  • Silktest
I have only reviewed SilkTest earlier. We found Testcomplete to be more user friendly and more intuitive to use and that is why it was selected.