Usage review after 1 year
March 04, 2022

Usage review after 1 year

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Widen

We use it for managing all our image assets for our projects. This solves collaboration and easy meta information for our SEO purpose. The main problem is with Searching and identifying images, Acquia DAM (Widen) makes it easy, still, a lot more options can be given. Saves tons of our time actually. Helps in the organization of images too.

Pros

  • Website projects
  • Collection and Organisation
  • Search

Cons

  • Search by image upload , badly needed.
  • Upload process can be made easy
  • Collection
  • SEO / META
  • 1 Place for all images
  • Search with keyword / meta helps a lot
  • Upload flow is bit confusing
  • Once uploaded its not clear where the uploaded section comes under
Widen will be our main use case for images going forward
Not really raised any issue / I am not familiar with the support area. I tried mainly with Acquia DAM (Widen) bot to get familiar with features on Acquia DAM (Widen) website and the product. Talked with my business team on support and they mentioned about smooth support experience with Acquia DAM (Widen). Maybe Frequent email feedback may cut short long-term questions/issues.
As a designer and the one who handles all images for our projects, Digital asset management really helps me in organizing, Code embedding, and bridging a gap between the developer deliverables and design. This actually helps a lot in attaching images over email with just a sharable link to Acquia DAM (Widen).
We have integrated Acquia DAM (Widen) with Sitecore for our workflow. We used to process images on the other side with Adobe XD for specific size and uses Sitecore to upload. With our recent integration, we are planning to upload in Acquia DAM (Widen) alone to get synced in Sitecore. This may lead us to a single upload space to Acquia DAM (Widen) and sync up with our Sitecore tool

Do you think Acquia DAM (Widen) delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Acquia DAM (Widen)'s feature set?

Yes

Did Acquia DAM (Widen) live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Acquia DAM (Widen) go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy Acquia DAM (Widen) again?

Yes

Well suited -> For handling the big size and many images with organization/collection. Searchable with meta is too much time-saving. Fewer use -> not everyone in the organization uses it, so it can be less complex, more focused on designers/ SEO experts. Muti action feature can be improved. It's hard to do actions in bulk sometime

Acquia DAM (Widen) Feature Ratings

Not Rated
Uploading assets
Not Rated
Downloading assets
Not Rated
Categories
Not Rated
Asset storage
Not Rated
Asset sharing
Not Rated
Asset search
Not Rated
Tagging system
Not Rated
Content editing
Not Rated
Embed codes
Not Rated
Metadata
Not Rated
Collections
Not Rated
User access
Not Rated
DAM Integrations
Not Rated
DAM API
Not Rated
Workflow automations
Not Rated
Related asset discovery
Not Rated
Dashboards
Not Rated
Standard reports
Not Rated
Custom reports
Not Rated
Data exportability
Not Rated
Content analytics
Not Rated

Comments

More Reviews of Acquia DAM (Widen)