The Wrike choice for print media
Overall Satisfaction with Wrike
We use Wrike to manage projects and deadlines. I work on the team that oversees our organization's print media, so our main use of Wrike is to keep track of the various writing, editing, and production steps each mailing requires. Wrike is an effective tool for everyone—including both colleagues and external contributors—to see the status of each piece and who is responsible for what.
Pros
- Blueprints in Wrike make it easy to schedule recurring projects. For instance, to create a project for each month's newsletter we just have to adjust the end date; the other dates and assignees fill automatically.
- The folder—>project—>task—>sub-task system allows for a range of versatility and depth of organization.
- The "add versions" feature allows us to save copies of every version of a document we review for a given task while making it clear which version is the newest. This feature is crucial for us, as editing Word docs is one of the main tasks we do.
Cons
- I find the Gantt chart feature difficult to understand.
- Sometimes when I need to reschedule sub-tasks within a task, rescheduling one sub-task will cause others to reschedule in a way I did not want.
- Sometimes I have difficulty adjusting the order tasks or projects appear in.
- Adding versions of a document streamlines our editing process, preventing us from reviewing outdated versions of a document. This feature saves time, especially when working with external contributors who may not know Wrike well.
- Blueprints save time because we do not have to manually enter all the details when scheduling a recurring project.
Do you think Wrike delivers good value for the price?
Not sure
Are you happy with Wrike's feature set?
Yes
Did Wrike live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Wrike go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Wrike again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation