Acoustic Tealeaf vs. Google Optimize

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Acoustic Tealeaf
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Acoustic Tealeaf (formerly Acoustic Experience Analytics and before that IBM Tealeaf; Acoustic has restored the former branding), is an AI powered application providing site visitor session recording and replay, anomaly detection, and struggle analytics.N/A
Google Optimize
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Google offers the Optimize A/B testing tool for testing website content and versions.N/A
Pricing
Acoustic TealeafGoogle Optimize
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Google Optimize
Free
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Acoustic TealeafGoogle Optimize
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Acoustic TealeafGoogle Optimize
Features
Acoustic TealeafGoogle Optimize
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Acoustic Tealeaf
-
Ratings
Google Optimize
4.9
8 Ratings
52% below category average
a/b experiment testing00 Ratings4.08 Ratings
Split URL testing00 Ratings2.08 Ratings
Multivariate testing00 Ratings4.08 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing00 Ratings1.06 Ratings
Cross-browser testing00 Ratings6.44 Ratings
Mobile app testing00 Ratings2.72 Ratings
Test significance00 Ratings1.07 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings3.07 Ratings
Advanced code editor00 Ratings2.07 Ratings
Page surveys00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Visitor recordings00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Preview mode00 Ratings3.06 Ratings
Test duration calculator00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Experiment scheduler00 Ratings7.05 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval00 Ratings8.93 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation00 Ratings6.92 Ratings
Client-side tests00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
Server-side tests00 Ratings2.62 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Acoustic Tealeaf
-
Ratings
Google Optimize
7.0
8 Ratings
22% below category average
Standard visitor segmentation00 Ratings6.08 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation00 Ratings7.06 Ratings
Traffic allocation control00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Website personalization00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Acoustic Tealeaf
-
Ratings
Google Optimize
8.2
8 Ratings
5% below category average
Heatmap tool00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Click analytics00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Scroll maps00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Form fill analysis00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Conversion tracking00 Ratings9.06 Ratings
Goal tracking00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Test reporting00 Ratings7.06 Ratings
Results segmentation00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
CSV export00 Ratings9.93 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard00 Ratings9.97 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Acoustic TealeafGoogle Optimize
Small Businesses
Matomo Analytics
Matomo Analytics
Score 8.6 out of 10
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Siteimprove
Siteimprove
Score 9.1 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Contentsquare
Contentsquare
Score 7.5 out of 10
Dynamic Yield
Dynamic Yield
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Acoustic TealeafGoogle Optimize
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(6 ratings)
5.0
(10 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
5.7
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(4 ratings)
User Testimonials
Acoustic TealeafGoogle Optimize
Likelihood to Recommend
Acoustic
Tealeaf is a must for any site that has a key business process that drives revenue for a company. It is not limited to only capturing a small percentage of visitors to your site, it captures every visitor to your site. A lot has changed to the last year for Tealeaf for the good. There are many more options to for capturing data including a cloud and SaaS offering. Take a look again if you haven't seen it in a while.
Read full review
Google
It is a little too limited for a full stack experimentation programme. Many times we required development support or tech advise but we were simply unable to get this due to it being google. This was a big problem for us. However it is quite good if you were looking to get started in experimentation and didn’t have the budgets for a wider tool
Read full review
Pros
Acoustic
  • Speed of searching for web sessions and users. This particular feature seems to impress me the most. When researching incidents where users report to have difficulty on our site, all we need is any of the unique identifiers of a user (email address used, IP address, user id) and we can locate their session(s) almost immediately in TeaLeaf.
  • Multiple conditional events - I really like how we can have events contain already existing events. This helps a great deal if issues being researched become even more complex.
Read full review
Google
  • Easy to follow set up procedures. Once I walk a client through the process, it's effortless for them to emulate on subsequent tests.
  • Lots of geo and user attribute customization features to be able to drill down into specific targeted audiences — all based on the power of Google's immense data system.
  • Google Optimize is the logical choice for many people to start with since most are already familiar with and using GA.
Read full review
Cons
Acoustic
  • IBM is still working out a solution for seeing Mobile App traffic in Tealeaf. What they have now allows you to see the response and request, but it doesn't show where the customer is actually clicking. They've promised that newer versions will be better with this.
  • Tealeaf is pushing a web based viewer, trying to make this the standard over the more robust and extremely useful desktop based Tealeaf Viewer. the Web Based viewer is slow and clunky and just not as flexible, but IBM insists on pushing customers towards it. Last I heard, they plan for their mobile solution to only work in the web based viewer.
  • Recently IBM moved all the support documentation for Tealeaf to the IBM Support portal instead of Tealeaf.com where it has been for years. This completely broke the in application Tealeaf Help. At the time of my last use of Tealeaf near the end of November 2013, when you tried to search help from the Tealeaf web portal, you were sent to the IBM support site, and once you logged in, the search request was lost and you had to start the search again. The search of the help files is also nowhere near as good as the original tealeaf.com help site. Also, if your users tried to use help, they were out of luck because only the Tealeaf Admins have access to the IBM support portal. At first they insisted that they were not going to fix this for older versions of the software, but instead only release a fix when the next version of Tealeaf was release. There was a large discussion about this on the LinkedIn forum and IBM has said they're working on a solution, but I'm not sure when/if that will get release.
Read full review
Google
  • Only works for browsers, not for the apps testing.
  • Missing possibility to test complicated features.
  • Audience division in groups is not always accurate.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Acoustic
Tealeaf is a scalable product that works with complex user-facing environments. It is one of the leading products in the market that helps identify user pain points and increases defect identification. The user interface is simple, clean, and easy to use. Lastly, Tealeaf Support provides good customer service and is eager to help solve chalenges we face along the way.
Read full review
Google
No answers on this topic
Usability
Acoustic
No answers on this topic
Google
Google has always been known to make easy-to-use products. The Google Optimize interface is intuitive and easy to follow for anyone.
Read full review
Support Rating
Acoustic
No answers on this topic
Google
Google has well-documented resources and unlimited use cases that can be found online. Plus, their support is always helpful and available.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Acoustic
No answers on this topic
Google
Google Optimize being part of the Google stack makes it great in reporting and analysis. Wish Google would add more features like dynamic tests, multi funnel tests, conversion calculator based on the total number of traffic of the page being tested instead of using the websites total traffic. Should integrate form analysis, heatmap, and page analytics.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Acoustic
  • With the specific KPI's we report on, Tealeaf has helped shine a light on metrics we would not have seen in a normal analytics reporting tool.
  • Tealeaf has helped us pinpoint areas of user struggle and vastly improved our website experience.
Read full review
Google
  • We were able to increase our main KPI for conversions by almost 50% by testing button copy.
  • We were able to increase secondary KPIs for conversions by almost 30% by testing form design.
Read full review
ScreenShots