Acoustic Tealeaf (formerly Acoustic Experience Analytics and before that IBM Tealeaf; Acoustic has restored the former branding), is an AI powered application providing site visitor session recording and replay, anomaly detection, and struggle analytics.
N/A
Google Optimize
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Google offers the Optimize A/B testing tool for testing website content and versions.
N/A
Pricing
Acoustic Tealeaf
Google Optimize
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Google Optimize
Free
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Acoustic Tealeaf
Google Optimize
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Acoustic Tealeaf
Google Optimize
Features
Acoustic Tealeaf
Google Optimize
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Acoustic Tealeaf
-
Ratings
Google Optimize
4.9
8 Ratings
52% below category average
a/b experiment testing
00 Ratings
4.08 Ratings
Split URL testing
00 Ratings
2.08 Ratings
Multivariate testing
00 Ratings
4.08 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
00 Ratings
1.06 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
00 Ratings
6.44 Ratings
Mobile app testing
00 Ratings
2.72 Ratings
Test significance
00 Ratings
1.07 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
00 Ratings
3.07 Ratings
Advanced code editor
00 Ratings
2.07 Ratings
Page surveys
00 Ratings
5.02 Ratings
Visitor recordings
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Preview mode
00 Ratings
3.06 Ratings
Test duration calculator
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
00 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval
00 Ratings
8.93 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation
00 Ratings
6.92 Ratings
Client-side tests
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Server-side tests
00 Ratings
2.62 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Acoustic Tealeaf
-
Ratings
Google Optimize
7.0
8 Ratings
22% below category average
Standard visitor segmentation
00 Ratings
6.08 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
00 Ratings
7.06 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Website personalization
00 Ratings
7.07 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Tealeaf is a must for any site that has a key business process that drives revenue for a company. It is not limited to only capturing a small percentage of visitors to your site, it captures every visitor to your site. A lot has changed to the last year for Tealeaf for the good. There are many more options to for capturing data including a cloud and SaaS offering. Take a look again if you haven't seen it in a while.
It is a little too limited for a full stack experimentation programme. Many times we required development support or tech advise but we were simply unable to get this due to it being google. This was a big problem for us. However it is quite good if you were looking to get started in experimentation and didn’t have the budgets for a wider tool
Speed of searching for web sessions and users. This particular feature seems to impress me the most. When researching incidents where users report to have difficulty on our site, all we need is any of the unique identifiers of a user (email address used, IP address, user id) and we can locate their session(s) almost immediately in TeaLeaf.
Multiple conditional events - I really like how we can have events contain already existing events. This helps a great deal if issues being researched become even more complex.
Easy to follow set up procedures. Once I walk a client through the process, it's effortless for them to emulate on subsequent tests.
Lots of geo and user attribute customization features to be able to drill down into specific targeted audiences — all based on the power of Google's immense data system.
Google Optimize is the logical choice for many people to start with since most are already familiar with and using GA.
IBM is still working out a solution for seeing Mobile App traffic in Tealeaf. What they have now allows you to see the response and request, but it doesn't show where the customer is actually clicking. They've promised that newer versions will be better with this.
Tealeaf is pushing a web based viewer, trying to make this the standard over the more robust and extremely useful desktop based Tealeaf Viewer. the Web Based viewer is slow and clunky and just not as flexible, but IBM insists on pushing customers towards it. Last I heard, they plan for their mobile solution to only work in the web based viewer.
Recently IBM moved all the support documentation for Tealeaf to the IBM Support portal instead of Tealeaf.com where it has been for years. This completely broke the in application Tealeaf Help. At the time of my last use of Tealeaf near the end of November 2013, when you tried to search help from the Tealeaf web portal, you were sent to the IBM support site, and once you logged in, the search request was lost and you had to start the search again. The search of the help files is also nowhere near as good as the original tealeaf.com help site. Also, if your users tried to use help, they were out of luck because only the Tealeaf Admins have access to the IBM support portal. At first they insisted that they were not going to fix this for older versions of the software, but instead only release a fix when the next version of Tealeaf was release. There was a large discussion about this on the LinkedIn forum and IBM has said they're working on a solution, but I'm not sure when/if that will get release.
Tealeaf is a scalable product that works with complex user-facing environments. It is one of the leading products in the market that helps identify user pain points and increases defect identification. The user interface is simple, clean, and easy to use. Lastly, Tealeaf Support provides good customer service and is eager to help solve chalenges we face along the way.
Google Optimize being part of the Google stack makes it great in reporting and analysis. Wish Google would add more features like dynamic tests, multi funnel tests, conversion calculator based on the total number of traffic of the page being tested instead of using the websites total traffic. Should integrate form analysis, heatmap, and page analytics.