Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
ActiveBatch from Advanced Systems Concepts in New Jersey is IT workload automation software.N/A
Azure Logic Apps
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft offers the Azure Logic Apps as a cloud-based integration service, supporting data and application integration.
$0
per execution
SAP Integration Suite
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
SAP Integration Suite is an integration platform-as-a-service (iPaaS) that helps quickly integrate on-premises and cloud-based processes, services, applications, events, and data. It is used to accelerate innovation, automate more processes, and realize a faster time to value.
$11,199
per year
Pricing
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationAzure Logic AppsSAP Integration Suite
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Actions
$0.000025
per execution
Standard Connector
$0.000025
per execution
Enterprise Connector
$0.001
per execution
Integration Account - Basic
$0.42
per hour
Integration Account - Standard
$1.37
per hour
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationAzure Logic AppsSAP Integration Suite
Free Trial
YesYesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAccess to free tier services does not expire while there is an active Pay-As-You-Go or CPEA account with SAP. Once a free tier service limit has been reached users have the option to update from a free to a paid service plan in the same account.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationAzure Logic AppsSAP Integration Suite
Considered Multiple Products
ActiveBatch Workload Automation

No answer on this topic

Azure Logic Apps
Chose Azure Logic Apps
When we proposed products for central integration, we were also introduced to software like Pabbly - which was in its early stages of company growth. The main reason why we picked Azure Logic apps over the other software is that it is manufactured by the renowned company …
SAP Integration Suite
Chose SAP Integration Suite
Because of ease and the plethora of adapters and connectors, we use the SAP integration suite.
Features
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationAzure Logic AppsSAP Integration Suite
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
9.6
22 Ratings
15% above category average
Azure Logic Apps
-
Ratings
SAP Integration Suite
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling9.620 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Central monitoring9.622 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Logging9.621 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications9.622 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization9.621 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Application integration9.621 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
-
Ratings
Azure Logic Apps
8.5
16 Ratings
6% above category average
SAP Integration Suite
7.9
251 Ratings
1% below category average
Pre-built connectors00 Ratings9.416 Ratings8.3237 Ratings
Connector modification00 Ratings9.015 Ratings7.8202 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration00 Ratings8.214 Ratings8.3230 Ratings
Data quality services00 Ratings8.314 Ratings7.9209 Ratings
Data security features00 Ratings7.815 Ratings8.1222 Ratings
Monitoring console00 Ratings8.314 Ratings7.0228 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationAzure Logic AppsSAP Integration Suite
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Make
Make
Score 9.3 out of 10
Make
Make
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.7 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.6 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
IBM App Connect
IBM App Connect
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationAzure Logic AppsSAP Integration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
9.6
(23 ratings)
8.8
(16 ratings)
8.5
(304 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(7 ratings)
Usability
8.4
(2 ratings)
9.0
(5 ratings)
2.1
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(1 ratings)
7.5
(2 ratings)
6.0
(4 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ActiveBatch Workload AutomationAzure Logic AppsSAP Integration Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
Redwood Software
Any large business or organisation that wants to manage their workload effectively and with the least amount of room for error might choose the ActiveBatch Automation tool. Being a consultant I feel that It aids in task automation and has the flexibility to change in response to varying company requirements. It helps to save huge time by doing all the repetitive tasks on daily basis. During the patching activity the schedulers can be stopped. It also help by alerting us if any system/job is down so that SLA can be saved. Overall ActiveBatch Automation stands as a dependable cornerstone for ensuring the seamless operation of our tasks.
Read full review
Microsoft
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps was a perfect solution for us to integrate the apps and products we used in our business to create automated workflows which were also complex and very advanced. This was a very new feature for us, and also it reduced our software costs massively and also saved us a lot of time. With the crisis, we were in back then Azure turned out to be the best cost-friendly solution because we only had to pay for what we used!
Read full review
SAP
In our case to have a such a poweful middleware in the cloud, give us a lot of benefits such as maintenance and support. In the integration part to be able to connect SAP and Non SAP applications makes SAP Integration Suite a good investment when our master data in this case is in S4HANA. Less appropriate is that sometimes the updates in production tenant failed and they have to downgrade or repair the issues. Affecting the usage of the tool. I guess SAP team have to be more aware of performing the changes and tested well on development environments and then when they know for sure that is the correct way to go with the update put it in production.
Read full review
Pros
Redwood Software
  • Businesses can use ActiveBatch to plan tasks based on parameters like frequency, dependencies, and the time of day. By automating typical actions like backups and data transfers, businesses can make sure that crucial operations go off without a hitch.
  • Multiple systems and apps can be used in complicated workflows that ActiveBatch can automate. For instance, it can automate a workflow for processing orders from beginning to end, from the customer order through inventory control and delivery through the processing of invoices and payments.
  • Files can be sent between many platforms and systems safely with ActiveBatch. Transfers to cloud-based storage systems like Amazon S3 and Microsoft Azure are also included in this. SFTP and FTP transfers are also included.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Connecting to different services using OOB connectors
  • Support for HTTP connectors which enables user to leverage RestAPIs
  • Readability, i.e., it looks just like a Visio diagram. Even managers or HRs can have a look and get to know what's happening
  • It's a Programmer's Lego. It's fun connecting them at the same time getting the work done
Read full review
SAP
  • Enhanced API management features that allow now the integration with a multitude of data feeds and rating agencies
  • Immediate evaluation of potential issues and configurable thresholds and automatic notifications.
  • The application will monitor all aspects of compliance and update them automatically for several jurisdictions at time
Read full review
Cons
Redwood Software
  • On RARE occasions, have seen scheduling properties changed that don't take effect.
  • Simpler to understand/more robust reporting options would be nice to have.
  • Maybe I'm missing something, but why doesn't the Instances view show completion time? Just execution time and duration.
Read full review
Microsoft
  • It falls short of alerting capabilities.
  • Microsoft Azure should be unclouded with its pricing. We don't always know how much an inclusion will affect the monthly price. So we have to speculate where we are with the price and if we can afford to include another asset.
Read full review
SAP
  • Provide more pre-built integrations to use within SuccessFactors or other modules instead of everything having to be custom built
  • Support is unable to provide advice on custom builds so you often have to engage a 3rd party partner
  • Works best when you have the functional and technical teams working together. Otherwise, the system is too technical for a functional user to create integration and a technical user not always understand the functional perspective
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Redwood Software
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
It is in place, our system integrators are familiar with it, and it fits into the ecosystem. A better user interface, flow build and debugging experience would see it grow, many technical staff do not enjoy using it for this reason, however it is quite capable and powerful behind this one shortcoming.
Read full review
Usability
Redwood Software
We can easily add new plans/jobs in our batch schedules. Also, coordination with reporting and QA jobs is simple to do. Building schedules, restarting jobs, triggering dependencies is easy to understand. The system is very stable and allows us to easily see overall processing times.
Read full review
Microsoft
I found them easy to use and adapt to different scenarios, from Azure management to link processes between REST APIs. Together with Function Apps, they're probably the most useful resource type for Azure. Today, I use them in production, and that's a key component: stable, secure, easy to manage, and maintain.
Read full review
SAP
The user interface is messy and not intuitive. It has a steep learning curve, and flows developed around are easy to make a mess with layout and can be difficult to follow. The debugging is also quite difficult, it takes some time to figure out how to follow the flow and examine data. Error handling is also difficult and not intuitive, it is better to let some errors leak and monitor through ALM.
Read full review
Support Rating
Redwood Software
My colleague contacted them directly, I only know hearsay on this but it was not good.
Read full review
Microsoft
Azure Logic Apps are backed by Azure and Microsoft. There is a wealth of information on the internet about both of these platforms. In addition to this Microsoft has a huge bush to using this platform and have offered many solutions and support options to the user. The only drawback is that it is a fairly new platform so the 3rd party information tends to be lacking.
Read full review
SAP
The support for SAP Integration Suite is satisfactory. We leverage SAP support through our manage services partner. So far, we have not had many major issues. One concern, to make our rating a ten, would be turnaround time on high priority incidents. SAP Integration Suite drives our key business functions forward. Without a reasonable service level agreement on turnaround, we sometimes find us running into issues running pay, etc.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Redwood Software
No answers on this topic
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
SAP
Work with an SAP implementation partner, if possible.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Redwood Software
The workload automation solution is based on the specific needs of an organization, as well as the features, capabilities, and costs of various solutions. A thorough evaluation process and consideration of these factors can help ensure the selection of a solution that aligns with overall business objectives and meets the specific needs of the organization.
Read full review
Microsoft
This is very dependent on the line of work you are in and the unique company requirements, as is the case with everything. We utilize Azure Logic Apps for all of our computing solutions within our domain, and it has always worked flawlessly. One of the simplest clouds to set up and use is by far the most popular.
Read full review
SAP
SAP Integration Suite was already part of our SAP stack, part of Business Technology Platform, with out-of-the-box integration with S/4 HANA transactional and ERP system that we are using as our main back-end. Thus, we are achieving significant Total Cost Optimization benefits or running both solutions on the same platform, hosted on Azure cloud.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Redwood Software
  • I have not run numbers to determine hard impact, but a quick estimate is that at least one job is running for a average of about 6 hours per day - that 6 hours, if done by hand, would equate to about 30 - 40 hours per day (and in some cases, could not be duplicated manually, as the job repeats faster than a person could accomplish one cycle.)
Read full review
Microsoft
  • Moving to Serverless Computing obviously makes the organization get rid of dependent Infra.
  • ROI can be seen immediately as the required infra can be decommissioned after a successful quarter run.
  • Being deployed as a single entity or single app on Azure Logic Apps, Organizations need to be more careful with controls applied to meet compliance and security posture.
Read full review
SAP
  • In the long run will enable us to undeploy our on premise solution
  • As long as integration suite doesn't support all capabilities PO has complete migration is hard
  • Will probably be cheaper than our on premise solution when we are completely migrated
Read full review
ScreenShots

SAP Integration Suite Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of