TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    ActiveBatch Workload Automation

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AActiveBatch from Advanced Systems Concepts in New Jersey is IT workload automation software.N/A

    JAMS

    Score7.9 out of 10
    N/AJAMS is a centralized workload automation and job scheduling solution that runs, monitors, and manages jobs and workflows. Reliably orchestrate the critical IT processes that run your business from a single pane of glass.

    $9,996

    per year

    Pricing
    ActiveBatch Workload AutomationJAMS
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Core
    9,996.00
    per year
    Advanced
    Customized Pricing
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ActiveBatch Workload AutomationJAMS
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
    Additional Details- Core: For small teams getting started with automation. Core Integrations: PowerShell, SQL, Azure Data Factory, Python, 20+ others. - Advanced: Comprehensive solution for large-scale operations. Core Integrations: SAP, JDE, Ellucian Banner, Informatica, Mainframe and Power Systems.
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ActiveBatch Workload AutomationJAMS
    Considered Both Products
    Redwood Software
    Chose ActiveBatch Workload Automation
    During initial selection, we compared ActiveBatch with simple schedulers like Task Manager and cron, as well as VisualCron and JAMS. ActiveBatch had the widest range of triggers and the best scheduler/calendar system, and the most comprehensive list of easily-available actions.

    W…
    Incentivized
    JAMS Software
    Chose JAMS
    JAMS fulfilled the same automation functionality at a far less cost and in a simplified licensing model.
    Incentivized
    Chose JAMS
    We chose JAMS because it was the best solution for our business needs, a major factor being the licensing model and the simplicity of the app. We needed to migrate things fast too and this was simply plug and play without too much headache
    Incentivized
    Chose JAMS
    For us, JAMS has a great balance of price and functionality.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    95%
    Would buy again
    18 Answers
    94%
    Would buy again
    66 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    94%
    Delivers good value for the price
    17 Answers
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    58 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    95%
    Happy with the feature set
    18 Answers
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    67 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    16 Answers
    98%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    49 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    15 Answers
    93%
    Implementation went as expected
    54 Answers
    Features
    ActiveBatch Workload AutomationJAMS
    Workload Automation
    Comparison of Workload Automation features of ActiveBatch Workload Automation and JAMS
    Feature
    ActiveBatch Workload Automation
    9.6
    22 Ratings
    15% above category average
    JAMS
    7.4
    70 Ratings
    11% below category average
    Multi-platform scheduling9.620 Ratings8.062 Ratings
    Central monitoring9.622 Ratings7.868 Ratings
    Logging9.621 Ratings7.268 Ratings
    Alerts and notifications9.622 Ratings8.167 Ratings
    Analysis and visualization9.621 Ratings6.466 Ratings
    Application integration9.621 Ratings6.865 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ActiveBatch Workload AutomationJAMS
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Apache Airflow
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Apache Airflow
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Redwood RunMyJobs
    Score9.7 out of 10
    Redwood RunMyJobs
    Score9.7 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ActiveBatch Workload AutomationJAMS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.6
    (23 ratings)
    7.7
    (71 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.7
    (11 ratings)
    Usability
    8.4
    (2 ratings)
    8.4
    (10 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (6 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (6 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.1
    (71 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (9 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (5 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.7
    (3 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (4 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.4
    (69 ratings)
    Professional Services
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.4
    (4 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (5 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.5
    (5 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ActiveBatch Workload AutomationJAMS
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Redwood Software
    Any large business or organisation that wants to manage their workload effectively and with the least amount of room for error might choose the ActiveBatch Automation tool. Being a consultant I feel that It aids in task automation and has the flexibility to change in response to varying company requirements. It helps to save huge time by doing all the repetitive tasks on daily basis. During the patching activity the schedulers can be stopped. It also help by alerting us if any system/job is down so that SLA can be saved. Overall ActiveBatch Automation stands as a dependable cornerstone for ensuring the seamless operation of our tasks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JAMS Software
    There's probably better schedulers out there. JAMS is good for an on-premises/classic IT implementation. JAMS is well-suited for use cases such as collecting a file from a shared location and uploading it to an API, running scripts on servers, and handling middleware tasks that process files or data between handoffs across different locations. JAMS is best suited to environments
    with IT staff who can develop, test, implement, maintain, and troubleshoot
    scripts; it does not use natural language processing (so it requires in-depth
    knowledge of the scripting language in use), and it does not appear to offer
    native dashboarding or reporting that is easily accessible to all users.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Redwood Software
    • Businesses can use ActiveBatch to plan tasks based on parameters like frequency, dependencies, and the time of day. By automating typical actions like backups and data transfers, businesses can make sure that crucial operations go off without a hitch.
    • Multiple systems and apps can be used in complicated workflows that ActiveBatch can automate. For instance, it can automate a workflow for processing orders from beginning to end, from the customer order through inventory control and delivery through the processing of invoices and payments.
    • Files can be sent between many platforms and systems safely with ActiveBatch. Transfers to cloud-based storage systems like Amazon S3 and Microsoft Azure are also included in this. SFTP and FTP transfers are also included.
    Read full review
    JAMS Software
    • JAMS works well to organize jobs into logical folders with unique permissions for each folder
    • JAMS makes it easy to set up alerts for job failures and other notifications
    • Setting up scheduling times with normal human wording, such as Weekdays, or 2nd Tuesday of the month, etc.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Redwood Software
    • On RARE occasions, have seen scheduling properties changed that don't take effect.
    • Simpler to understand/more robust reporting options would be nice to have.
    • Maybe I'm missing something, but why doesn't the Instances view show completion time? Just execution time and duration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JAMS Software
    • Would love to see JAMS become a SaaS type of product instead of needing to be hosted by ourselves
    • having lots of jobs in the monitor area can lead to performance issues when running the client locally
    • dashboard and reporting tools could be more user friendly and provide more functionality to help monitoring teams spot recurring issues easily
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Redwood Software
    No answers on this topic
    JAMS Software
    JAMS is a critical resource free up people to do other things and ensuring that processes and tasks are run consistently. We are also confident that procedures are run consistently and on time or as soon as the necessary data is available. With automated job failure notification, we are not required to check that jobs are running correctly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Redwood Software
    We can easily add new plans/jobs in our batch schedules. Also, coordination with reporting and QA jobs is simple to do. Building schedules, restarting jobs, triggering dependencies is easy to understand. The system is very stable and allows us to easily see overall processing times.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JAMS Software
    JAMS is very user friendly; you hardly need to do coding. The only thing that I would say a challenge is setting it up, but that's because you barely know the product yet and, in every processing, setting up is the difficult part. But once you've set it up and you are going to use it, you will really feel that it is worth to invest in this kind of software solution, it really does it job very well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Redwood Software
    No answers on this topic
    JAMS Software
    We didnt really encounter any downtime, no issues encountered during 2 years of use of JAMs also our client barely raise an issue with JAMS, mostly the issues is on the batch jobs that jams executes. So I would gave it a perfect 10, very reliable hardly encounters any error and bug
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Redwood Software
    No answers on this topic
    JAMS Software
    JAMS performance is very great, there are no issues raised with the performance, it just like nothing happens on the job after integration it gives you this monitoring capability, no reports and bugs raised on the performance, we didnt do integration with other software only database and with use of JAMS agent to different servers
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Redwood Software
    My colleague contacted them directly, I only know hearsay on this but it was not good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JAMS Software
    I've never had to wait more than a day for a response to any email queries submitted. We had a very positive experience using support hours during out migration process from v6 to v7. We've also recently had a weeklong group training course where all attendees were positive about the learning outcomes, a shoutout to Jose who did both the migration and the weeklong course!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Redwood Software
    No answers on this topic
    JAMS Software
    People that were involved in the POC found the training a lot easier to follow. I think most people would have preferred to just get the training material and run through themselves.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Redwood Software
    No answers on this topic
    JAMS Software
    I Was not part of the original Implementation, and the persons did that are no longer with the Organization. But I was part of the recent Upgrade process a year ago and I am the JAMS admin and was very pleased
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Redwood Software
    The workload automation solution is based on the specific needs of an organization, as well as the features, capabilities, and costs of various solutions. A thorough evaluation process and consideration of these factors can help ensure the selection of a solution that aligns with overall business objectives and meets the specific needs of the organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JAMS Software
    JAMS is WAY more advanced, it isn't a fair comparison. The history is easy to get through. It is easy to get alerts of complete to failed and with a log. Adding jobs is extremely easy that even my teammates who do not manange the software are able to set them up. With the new web component we are very excited for the future of JAMS advancements.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    Redwood Software
    No answers on this topic
    JAMS Software
    i didnt have any involvement in the sales process, however we purchased the product so it had to be decent.
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Redwood Software
    No answers on this topic
    JAMS Software
    The product is quite flexible. There are a number of features and functions that we use on a daily basis, and there are many features that are available that we have not yet needed or explored (like setting up jobs with the ability to do FTP or Sftp file transfers).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Professional Services
    Redwood Software
    No answers on this topic
    JAMS Software
    i didnt have any involvement in the sales process, however we purchased the product so it had to be decent.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Redwood Software
    • I have not run numbers to determine hard impact, but a quick estimate is that at least one job is running for a average of about 6 hours per day - that 6 hours, if done by hand, would equate to about 30 - 40 hours per day (and in some cases, could not be duplicated manually, as the job repeats faster than a person could accomplish one cycle.)
    Read full review
    JAMS Software
    • Our company depends on the JAMS Scheduler in executing a large number of SAP Jobs. In never having had a true Enterprise Scheduler such as JAMS before now, we are very happy with the results.
    • There a number of features in JAMS for setting up schedules and dependencies on other jobs. This helps our company achieve the necessary workflows for Job execution. This optimization saves on system resources and keeps Jobs flowing smoothly.
    • We are very happy that JAMS is a robust solution with High Availability. This is necessary for Enterprise products, to reduce downtime, which we have not had as a result. This feature definitely saves our company money by reducing or eliminating unexpected downtime.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    JAMS Screenshots

    Screenshot of the Centralized Job Repository - here users store job definitions, schedules, and parameters in one central database.Screenshot of the Job Monitor - this displays the status of jobs and workloads from one central monitoring console. Viewers can drill down on individual jobs to diagnose failures, dependencies, and expected completion times.Screenshot of a Dashboard - Here, users can create data-rich visuals to monitor critical batch jobs and workflows running on various agents and on different business applications.Screenshot of the Centralized Job Repository - Stores job definitions, schedules, and parameters in a central database.Screenshot of the Visual Job Editor - a drag and drop editor for tasks is used to build multistep workflows that include dependencies, user input, parallel processes, and triggers.Screenshot of JAX  AI agent - built right into the JAMS Web Client. Ask it to find a job, troubleshoot a failure, or explain how something works, in plain language, and it answers grounded in real JAMS documentation.