Adobe Experience Manager vs Liferay Digital Experience Platform (DXP)

• Adobe Experience Manager keeps your content separate from your layout which allows for a lot of flexibility in how you display your content.
• Adobe Experience Manager integrates really well with other Adobe products like Adobe Analytics.
• Adobe Experience Manager 's drag and drop interface makes it fairly easy to utilize with minimal familiarity.

Read full review

• Theming
• Customization based on user roles
• Content Management
• Flexibility

Read full review

• Upgrading and applying patches can be hit or miss - I recommend backups because of the potential to damage the existing infrastructure
• Space management is an issue - every change or request takes up space that can be reclaimed, but only through a complicated procedure done through command prompts. There was no documentation for this on their site and we had to use a third party to create the procedure. It has to be run manually.
• There isn't a good backup system, particularly one that can be scheduled to run reliably.

Read full review

• Portal Security: It has good security model but in few areas it requires improvement.
• Encrypt LDAP passwords on import
• Log in should be via SSL by default
• Upgrade/patch process should include an alert in the control panel
• Add virus scan for uploaded files
• Server Administration
• Garbage Collector should be able to be scheduled to run from the control panel
• Reindexing should be able to be scheduled from the control panel
• Provide GUI to change the default Liferay favorite icon to any desired logo
• LDAP mapping GUI to custom Liferay attributes
• Configurations: Less configurations from properties files and provide more GUI to update from control panel.

Read full review

• Our direct business landing pages have seen an increase in ROI since switching to Adobe Experience Manager.
• Our non-direct pages have seen a severe drop-off in traffic and conversions since the switch to Adobe Experience Manager. The more creative, editorial-type content that used to be imperative to our site is now relegated to second tier. Just getting a "content hub" with this site was a beast of a project.
• The overall efficiency of our web team has increased with bulk edits, so that they can make single updates and impact our multiple sites. This is a huge money-saver for team staffing.

Read full review

• Can reduce IT costs eventually.
• Increases upfront costs due to technical knowledge needed for initial setup and maintenance.
• Hard to analyze ROI until after it's totally implemented.

Read full review