Adobe Social, incorporates technology from Context Optional and Efficient Frontier.
Adobe acquired Facebook advertising-management platform Efficient Frontier in November. Six months earlier, Efficient Frontier had acquired Facebook page-management platform Context Optional.
Adobe Social is an enterprise social platform competing with Buddy Media and Involver, enabling things like automated content marketing and social sweepstakes and competitions.
Customers tend to be medium to large…
N/A
Microsoft Viva Engage
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Viva Engage, formerly Yammer, is used for private communication within organizations or between organizational members and pre-designated groups.
$24
per year per user
Pricing
Adobe Social
Microsoft Viva Engage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Microsoft Viva Employee Communications and Communities
$24
per year per user
Microsoft Viva Suite
$144
per year per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe Social
Microsoft Viva Engage
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Microsoft Viva Engage is also available in some Microsoft 365 packages.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adobe Social
Microsoft Viva Engage
Features
Adobe Social
Microsoft Viva Engage
Listening/monitoring
Comparison of Listening/monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Social
7.4
9 Ratings
3% below category average
Microsoft Viva Engage
-
Ratings
Boolean keyword searches
7.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
Filtering out noise/spam
7.57 Ratings
00 Ratings
Sentiment analysis
7.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
Broad channel coverage
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publishing
Comparison of Publishing features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Social
7.4
9 Ratings
9% below category average
Microsoft Viva Engage
-
Ratings
Content planning and scheduling
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience targeting
7.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content optimization
7.59 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow management
7.59 Ratings
00 Ratings
Engagement
Comparison of Engagement features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Social
7.7
8 Ratings
5% below category average
Microsoft Viva Engage
-
Ratings
Automated routing and prioritization
7.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer interaction histories
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bulk actions
7.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
Marketing
Comparison of Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Social
8.0
8 Ratings
4% above category average
Microsoft Viva Engage
-
Ratings
Lead generation
8.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Content marketing
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Paid media management
8.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Campaigns and promotions
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Channel coverage/integration
Comparison of Channel coverage/integration features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Social
7.9
9 Ratings
6% below category average
Microsoft Viva Engage
-
Ratings
Twitter
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Facebook
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
LinkedIn
7.57 Ratings
00 Ratings
Google+
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Instagram
8.57 Ratings
00 Ratings
Pinterest
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
YouTube
8.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting/analytics
Comparison of Reporting/analytics features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Social
7.8
9 Ratings
1% above category average
Microsoft Viva Engage
-
Ratings
Campaign success analytics
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Real-time tracking
7.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
Competitor analysis
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Account management
Comparison of Account management features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Social
7.3
8 Ratings
8% below category average
Microsoft Viva Engage
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions & privileges
7.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile access
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Social
-
Ratings
Microsoft Viva Engage
8.4
46 Ratings
8% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
8.828 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
8.515 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
8.023 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
7.823 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
8.843 Ratings
Search
00 Ratings
8.143 Ratings
Visual planning tools
00 Ratings
8.426 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Social
-
Ratings
Microsoft Viva Engage
8.6
49 Ratings
7% above category average
Chat
00 Ratings
9.344 Ratings
Notifications
00 Ratings
8.449 Ratings
Discussions
00 Ratings
9.648 Ratings
Surveys
00 Ratings
9.338 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
00 Ratings
9.338 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting
00 Ratings
7.314 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts
00 Ratings
6.713 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook
00 Ratings
8.632 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
I used Adobe Social when I use to have my own business on social media. After many months I was having no success in finding the correct clients for my products. Using Adobe Social I was able to market and discover different ways of searching for the correct clients and later on helped my business grow.
Yammer is great when you have a company culture that encourages friendly collaboration and communication. It can be a great supplement (but certainly not a substitute) for bonding and sharing ideas and thoughts. Certain channels can be really successful, too, like a channel where people can post dog pictures or something fun like that!
Adobe Social lacks strengths, as I believe Adobe themselves have acknowledged, given their decision not to continue support or development. But if I need to list three strengths, the first would be it can publish to some social media platforms with a success rate of over 50%. If that's a strength.
It has workflow processes, but they are over-complicated and poorly designed.
It has some basic analytics, but Adobe consultants usually recommend referring to Adobe Analytics instead. Which is great if you actually use Adobe Analytics.
It would be great if Adobe scheduled video uploads for Twitter.
A time change in a social post automatically puts the post back to Level 1 of approvals. It can be a big hassle to have to start the process over for such a small change.
Adobe uses a different algorithm to measure engagement our company does. It would be great to upload your own algorithm into Adobe.
Although the social enterprise network works very well, there is room for some slight improvement - such as the ability to attract users. By being part of the Microsoft Office Suite, it is offered as an "add-on" and many overlook it and see it as unnecessary at first. It would be smart for Microsoft to sell it as its own product so it could gather more popularity as a "social network".
Giving an option to filter results could be better as well as giving an option to turn off the "recent activity" bar on the home page.
I wasn't in charge of making the actual management decision, but I would absolutely renew Adobe Social. As I mentioned, it provides strong and in-depth analytics and listening tools. The reports that it generates are very thorough and easy to read. I loved the platform and would recommend it to anyone
Microsoft is dedicated to continual improvement on Yammer. They realize the value that Yammer brings to the table with their clients. In the short time that we have had Yammer implemented, we are just now beginning to see the strong impact it has on becoming more effective and efficient around collaboration.
The reason why I give this rating is that the overall platform is simple to use. You don't need to be tech-savvy or have a vast understanding of how to work a marketing tool. It is very simple to use compared to different platforms and you learn a lot of different ways to build your business.
Overall easy to use and intuitive, although limited in the possibility to personalize layout and look & feel of a site. Some functionalities are not easy to use, like document editing, but some others are quick and effective (posts and tagging above all). Performance and responsiveness of the Yammer site is typically acceptable, in my experience.
The reason why I give this a 9 out of 10 in terms of support is because of the mobile app functionality. I have had many issues in terms of logging in and also loading pages. The app overall is easy to use but at what cost? Other than that it is great and I still enjoy Adobe Social.
We have never had to use the support for Yammer. The tool works well and we have not come across any bugs. User Interface is simple and easy to use, similar to other forum type products, thereby removing the need for any extensive training. Team members are invited in and immediately are able to start using the tool.
Training was long and a little confusing. While a number of features carried over, they were still covered in this elongated training. It would have been nice to have training tailored to experience level with the product.
The implementation was done during our POC. We had a very mixed experience here, and have had some issues arise since based on the way the tool was implemented. An Adobe employee went ahead and made a change to our account that was unauthorized (helpful for our implementation) which caused issues in on boarding another team who needed the same change, but could not get it done without costly Adobe certification
Hootsuite Enterprise is superior in many ways, but the biggest factor is probably that it is constantly evolving and adding new features, working directly with social media companies ahead of new releases. Adobe seems to have stopped developing their product.
Our team briefly used Salesforce.com's Chatter product before switching over to Yammer in 2012. While Chatter is essentially the same product as Yammer, it left much to be desired. Chatter's design was (and remains) clunky and difficult to navigate. Yammer is a simple, easy-to-use product that offers similar functionality as Salesforce's Chatter.
Although we chose Adobe Social believing it could provide ROI metrics we could not get elsewhere, that turned out not to be the case. Site Catalyst can give us everything we need without Adobe Social
Adobe Social did not create greater efficiencies and speed up our activity within social media. In fact, it has done the oppposite. It is very cumbersome with little clear benefit.
My company is pleased with the positive impact Yammer has created departmentally and on an individual basis with work flow efficiency.
Adversely, most old and new employees are more familiar with SharePoint, causing the company to pay for training for all current and incoming employees.
As Yammer becomes more widely used, the need for training may diminish, which is where we will see our return on investment, as the product clearly provides a more effective form of file sharing and communication between employees and their department.