Agiloft offers contract lifecycle management (CLM) software, connecting contractual commitments to real business outcomes using its Data-first Agreement Platform (DAP). With contract data as the foundation, customers can collaboratively reach agreement and leverage contract visibility. Employing artificial intelligence as a legal force multiplier, and integration capabilities as a data liberator, organizations can use Agiloft’s certified implementers to deliver connected,…
N/A
Ironclad
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Ironclad, from the company of the same name in San Francisco, is designed to streamline every part of the contract process—so users can focus on legal work, not paperwork.
N/A
Pricing
Agiloft
Ironclad
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Agiloft
Ironclad
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Agiloft
Ironclad
Features
Agiloft
Ironclad
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
9.5
4 Ratings
16% above category average
Ironclad
6.3
5 Ratings
25% below category average
Contract creation
10.04 Ratings
9.04 Ratings
Contract templates
10.04 Ratings
9.55 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields
10.04 Ratings
3.14 Ratings
Guided logic
8.03 Ratings
3.63 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
8.8
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Ironclad
7.9
5 Ratings
3% below category average
Contract sharing
9.04 Ratings
8.45 Ratings
Contract editing
8.04 Ratings
7.45 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts
9.04 Ratings
8.45 Ratings
MS Word plug-in
9.04 Ratings
7.44 Ratings
Approval process
9.04 Ratings
7.95 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows
9.04 Ratings
7.95 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft
7.7
4 Ratings
7% below category average
Ironclad
5.1
5 Ratings
47% below category average
Contract database
8.04 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Contract search
7.04 Ratings
7.05 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts
7.04 Ratings
2.64 Ratings
Custom contract reports
8.04 Ratings
5.04 Ratings
Tracking contract status
8.04 Ratings
4.54 Ratings
Compliance check
7.04 Ratings
3.13 Ratings
Contract Management
Comparison of Contract Management features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft is great for storing contracts and being able to run reports on those contracts. Where is lacks is when there are amendments to the contracts which change information that you will run a report on. Since the data doesn't stack, if I wanted to run a report on any agreement with unpaid time off and there was unpaid time off added in the first amendment but removed in the second amendment, the first amendment would still hit the report even though the unpaid time off was removed in a later amendment
I think it worked realllly well at my previous company where we used it for a very simple form that just required one simple signature from both sides- this was a form used to record custom pricing/discounts for a product that typically was not discounted. In my current role, there are many more required fields on the form/contract, and can be multiple levels of approvals on one side, and then possibly multiple levels of approvals/signatures on the other side. I've never used another solution in the exact same way (like DocuSign) to be able to compare experiences, but on Ironclad, understanding where I am in the completion process can be confusing. Within the app, I wish it was more of just a checklist or schedule of what needs to happen, but it's not written out that clearly. Lastly, there is something wrong with our notifications (I'm not sure if this is specific to my company's settings)- I frequently get 'contract completed' or 'contract signed' email notifications even if that hasn't occurred. They seem to correlate with updating the form or refreshing the sync from SFDC.
As with our brains, we only use 10% of its capability. It can be as complex as you want it to be or as simple. The training requirements to use it have been minimal depending on the application. This is really a reflection as to how the workflow was configured
Ironclad is the best tool I have used to date, to manage workflow and tickets. It was very easy to use and navigate from the very first time I used it. My time is very valuable and I don't have time to sit in training sessions, simply to use a new product. I'm happy to say that I was never formally trained on Ironclad as it simply wasn't necessary.
Implementation was relatively easy and I have not had any issues with the support. UI change created some challenges for the end-users, but overall, it was a smooth experience. I hope the company will continue investing in the product and not consider it as something to not care about too much. I believe Agiloft does not make any other software, so I think the focus on it should not wane.
I haven't used the support services for IronClad, but I understand from our legal team, the support is very good, they have replied and provide solutions quickly and effectively. I have used the documentation and support pages which are very complete and which have been updated given the user interface updates.
Prior to implementing Agiloft, we used ProLaw. ProLaw acts as an electronic library for all contracts across the company. We were able to get this to work for us but it was limited in what functionality it provided. Agiloft is far superior when it comes to tracking and contract generation. Both systems store the agreements; however, Agiloft does a lot of the work for us. It creates the agreements with the click of a button, manages user permissions, sends automated reminders without requiring setup. These are all things ProLaw either didn't have or had but required manual entry. I was not the one who selected Agiloft as our new system, but after using it I can see why it was chosen.
At Gusto, where we operated on no contracts for many years, Ironclad allowed us to create a very simple process for getting approval for, and keeping records of, customized pricing on our new, high-end plan.
Wasn't part of the buying committee, but in my current role it's been heavily utilized externally for customer contracts, but also internally for employee agreements.
I don't have any actual numbers, and don't have a way to compare it to any prior e-signature setup.