TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) vs. AWS Elastic Beanstalk vs. AWS Lambda

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AAmazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) is a web service that provides secure, resizable compute capacity in the cloud. Users can launch instances with a variety of OSs, load them with custom application environments, manage network access permissions, and run images on multiple systems.

    $0.01

    per IP address with a running instance per hour on a pro rata basis

    AWS Elastic Beanstalk

    Score8.6 out of 10
    N/AAWS Elastic Beanstalk is the platform-as-a-service offering provided by Amazon and designed to leverage AWS services such as Amazon Elastic Cloud Compute (Amazon EC2), Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3).

    $35

    per month

    AWS Lambda

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AAWS Lambda is a serverless computing platform that lets users run code without provisioning or managing servers. With Lambda, users can run code for virtually any type of app or backend service—all with zero administration. It takes of requirements to run and scale code with high availability.

    $NaN

    Per 1 ms

    Pricing
    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)AWS Elastic BeanstalkAWS Lambda
    Editions & Modules
    Data Transfer
    $0.00 - $0.09
    per GB
    On-Demand
    $0.0042 - $6.528
    per Hour
    EBS-Optimized Instances
    $0.005
    per IP address with a running instance per hour on a pro rata basis
    Carrier IP Addresses
    $0.005 - $0.10
    T4g Instances
    $0.04
    per vCPU-Hour Linux, RHEL, & SLES
    T2, T3 Instances
    $0.05 ($0.096)
    per vCPU-Hour Linux, RHEL, & SLES (Windows)
    No Charge
    $0
    Users pay for AWS resources (e.g. EC2, S3 buckets, etc.) used to store and run the application.
    128 MB
    $0.0000000021
    Per 1 ms
    1024 MB
    $0.0000000167
    Per 1 ms
    10240 MB
    $0.0000001667
    Per 1 ms
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)AWS Elastic BeanstalkAWS Lambda
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoYesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)AWS Elastic BeanstalkAWS Lambda
    Considered Multiple Products
    Amazon AWS
    Chose Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
    We were looking to another AWS structure which would help us to avoid a lot of low level data analysis. In fact it appears to us that if even though AWS Lambda allows a lot of really good integration with a data scientist module, our team in order to make sure we are in full …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
    We chose Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) for our Splunk workloads so that we can take advantage of directly attached high speed storage, along with the other benefits of running on Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) instances, such as load balancing, spot pricing and general …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
    Amazon's been leading the way in the past few years in cloud computing and have easily become a name we can trust. When we looked at options, nothing compared to EC2 when you looked at the scalability and flexibility of the product. For the needs we were trying to meet, these …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
    EC2 is a much more advantageous compared with the competitors because it has a much better console, configuration, auto-scalability, uptime, and many other features that are way better than other services I have seen so far. It also provides great backup services integrated …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
    I have used DigitalOcean and Google Compute Engine on a trial period. EC2 was the best choice for my team due to the level of features it offers plus the ability to integrate it quickly given that we were already using so many other AWS Microservices. Getting up and running …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
    Performs well and competitive price. Clear Documentation would be another factor. I have found sometimes documentations are confusing and misleading.
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
    Azure VM and Google Compute Engine are alternatives to EC2. AWS EC2 is most matures and advanced of the 3. All these provide easy-to-deploy and automatically configured third-party applications, including single virtual machine or multiple virtual machine solutions.
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
    We chose EC2 over Azure because our tech stack was already invested in AWS. Documentation is better, and there is more community support for AWS services. EC2 is the pioneer in virtualization and we wanted to go with the stability of AWS. As far as pricing goes, EC2 can be …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
    AWS is by far the most mature platform, but others are catching up. We will be keeping a close eye on the competition and using them whenever they're a better fit for the workload than AWS.
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
    It is better than other products in terms of their support team, documentation and initially, you can set up your services almost without paying anything. Apart from them, AWS services do have the best availability in any region in compared to other cloud products available …
    Incentivized
    Chose Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
    If you want to scale your product very far, AWS is the tool to use – no doubt. It takes a lot longer to use than other products and is not trivial to use, but I have confidence my products can scale to meet the demands of millions of people with AWS. I do not have the same …
    Incentivized
    Amazon AWS
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    I use both EB and Lambda for different use cases. I normally use AWS Lambda for my smaller software needs.
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    We ended up with AWS Lambda to take workload off the developers and develop in tandem, then later integrate. We use both though.
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    There are many services like AWS Elastic beanstalk, but there are none with the maturity in the platform or the cost-effectiveness of AWS Elastic Beanstalk. Also, AWS Elastic Beanstalk is the oldest among them, so there are more people with AWS experience than the other …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    The AWS platform provides a great deal of configurability that is abstracted and provided very well through AWS Elastic Beanstalk. This is the main reason for choosing Elastic Beanstalk over competing services. Another reason for selecting AWS Beanstalk was vendor …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    We now default to Amazon ECS, due to flexibility this gives us with how workloads scale, and more network flexibility as many of our workloads are internal / external facing. We selected Elastic Beanstalk at beginning of our containerization phase, which suited our needs …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    We were already hosting on AWS so it just made sense to keep our infrastructure where we have it. And it all works pretty nicely.
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk is a great option for an organization that's already invested in the AWS ecosystem. The greater the number of complementary features needed by the application (e.g. integrating with Amazon's Elastic Load Balancer, databases, etc), the greater the reward …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    I enjoyed that Lightsail was so simple to provision and access via the in-browser SSH terminal, but ultimately Elastic Beanstalk is a more robust offering that interfaces seamlessly with more of AWS's other services. Elastic Beanstalk is also better equipped to automate …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    We didn't use Lambda much till now. We, however, found better control of resources in EBS.
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Honestly, I haven't tried any other alternative products. As already mentioned, I am already heavily invested in AWS, so EBS was a natural choice for me. In other reviews, I have found, AWS is better than its competitors. There are more flavors, and options in AWS, better …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    Heroku is another similar product which we had tried out to deploy one of the NodeJs project and it has lot of developer friendly features as well. Though Heroku is more expensive than Beanstalk is what I found. Heroku also has some restrictions which can affect the …
    Incentivized
    Amazon AWS
    Chose AWS Lambda
    It's fine, it works as the others would have, except EC2. We are migrating back to EC2 for dedicated compute because we have scaled to a point where we have consistent traffic. The tradeoff of maintaining infrastructure in-house outweighs the benefits of moving quickly through …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Lambda
    We use AWS as our primary cloud provider due to the overall availability of services, AWS Lambda is just one of the services we use with AWS which allows a more seamless integration for our microservices. AWS Lambda gives us much more flexibility and can be invoked by more …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Lambda
    AWS Lambda is much easier to use than the near alternatives. It is so straightforward and lightweight it is my primary service for handling small transactions or triggers. The other services require more setup time and are more complex to use. AWS Lambda takes your code snippet …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Lambda
    AWS is great product and a close match our expectations. It is close to Azure in function but more feature rich with API and support documents. From my experience, it is cheaper compared with our competitors and provides better interface. Overall our dev engineers prefer AWS …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Lambda
    When we use Lambda, we do not need to worry about the infrastructure and costs. AWS can handle it all on its own. For an optimum use case, one can always use AWS Lambda along with API Gateway and Route 53 for the best use case. Cloudwatch can help you identify any issues and …
    Incentivized
    Chose AWS Lambda
    Each service has its purpose. With EC2 you can provision servers for customers and internal projects. With EBs you can optimize what you need in performance with what you can afford. With AWS Lambda you can integrate several of these tools to work together or acomplish …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    93%
    Would buy again
    25 Answers
    88%
    Would buy again
    7 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    24 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    26 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    8 Answers
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    27 Answers
    88%
    Happy with the feature set
    7 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    24 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    22 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    5 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    96%
    Implementation went as expected
    26 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    7 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    21 Answers
    Features
    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)AWS Elastic BeanstalkAWS Lambda
    Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
    Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) and AWS Elastic Beanstalk and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
    8.7
    27 Ratings
    5% above category average
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    -
    Ratings
    AWS Lambda
    -
    Ratings
    Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime9.425 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Dynamic scaling9.226 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Elastic load balancing9.725 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pre-configured templates8.726 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Monitoring tools8.125 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pre-defined machine images8.625 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Operating system support8.326 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security controls8.526 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automation8.116 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform-as-a-Service
    Comparison of Platform-as-a-Service features of Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) and AWS Elastic Beanstalk and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
    -
    Ratings
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    7.8
    28 Ratings
    1% above category average
    AWS Lambda
    -
    Ratings
    Ease of building user interfaces00 Ratings8.018 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scalability00 Ratings7.028 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform management overhead00 Ratings8.027 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow engine capability00 Ratings7.022 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform access control00 Ratings8.027 Ratings00 Ratings
    Services-enabled integration00 Ratings8.027 Ratings00 Ratings
    Development environment creation00 Ratings7.027 Ratings00 Ratings
    Development environment replication00 Ratings8.028 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue monitoring and notification00 Ratings8.027 Ratings00 Ratings
    Issue recovery00 Ratings9.025 Ratings00 Ratings
    Upgrades and platform fixes00 Ratings8.026 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) and AWS Elastic Beanstalk and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
    -
    Ratings
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    -
    Ratings
    AWS Lambda
    8.8
    7 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings00 Ratings8.57 Ratings
    Single Sign-On (SSO)00 Ratings00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) and AWS Elastic Beanstalk and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
    -
    Ratings
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    -
    Ratings
    AWS Lambda
    4.9
    6 Ratings
    29% below category average
    Dashboards00 Ratings00 Ratings5.46 Ratings
    Standard reports00 Ratings00 Ratings5.05 Ratings
    Custom reports00 Ratings00 Ratings4.35 Ratings
    Function as a Service (FaaS)
    Comparison of Function as a Service (FaaS) features of Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) and AWS Elastic Beanstalk and AWS Lambda
    Feature
    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)
    -
    Ratings
    AWS Elastic Beanstalk
    -
    Ratings
    AWS Lambda
    8.8
    7 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Programming Language Diversity00 Ratings00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    Runtime API Authoring00 Ratings00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
    Function/Database Integration00 Ratings00 Ratings9.07 Ratings
    DevOps Stack Integration00 Ratings00 Ratings9.27 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)AWS Elastic BeanstalkAWS Lambda
    Small Businesses
    IBM Cloud Object Storage
    Score9 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Foundry
    Score8.5 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score6.5 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers
    Score8.7 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Private
    Score9.6 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score6.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    SAP on IBM Cloud
    Score9 out of 10
    Red Hat OpenShift
    Score9.1 out of 10
    IBM Cloud Functions
    Score6.5 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)AWS Elastic BeanstalkAWS Lambda
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (73 ratings)
    7.0
    (28 ratings)
    7.5
    (52 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.9
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    9.2
    (11 ratings)
    7.0
    (10 ratings)
    8.3
    (17 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.5
    (12 ratings)
    8.0
    (12 ratings)
    8.7
    (20 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2)AWS Elastic BeanstalkAWS Lambda
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Amazon AWS
    Suitable for companies that are looking for performance at a competitive price, flexibility to switch instance type even with RI, flexibility to add-on IOPS, option to lower running cost with the regular introduction of new instance type that comes with higher performance but at a lower cost.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    I have been using AWS Elastic Beanstalk for more than 5 years, and it has made our life so easy and hassle-free. Here are some scenarios where it excels -
    • I have been using different AWS services like EC2, S3, Cloudfront, Serverless, etc. And Elastic Beanstalk makes our lives easier by tieing each service together and making the deployment a smooth process.
    • N number of integrations with different CI/CD pipelines make this most engineer's favourite service.
    • Scalability & Security comes with the service, which makes it the absolute perfect product for your business.
    Personally, I haven't found any situations where it's not appropriate for the use cases it can be used. The pricing is also very cost-effective.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    Lambda excels at event-driven, short-lived tasks, such as processing files or building simple APIs. However, it's less ideal for long-running, computationally intensive, or applications that rely on carrying the state between jobs. Cold starts and constant load can easily balloon the costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Amazon AWS
    • Huge Diverse range of machine shapes are available which cater to our demand.
    • Ability to combine the machines and integrate them with any other service in AWS (Ex: RDS, S3)
    • Handling performance and scalability using auto-scaling, ELB configuration and high performance machine shapes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • Getting a project set up using the console or CLI is easy compared to other [computing] platforms.
    • AWS Elastic Beanstalk supports a variety of programming languages so teams can experiment with different frameworks but still use the same compute platform for rapid prototyping.
    • Common application architectures can be referenced as patterns during project [setup].
    • Multiple environments can be deployed for an application giving more flexibility for experimentation.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • No provisioning required - we don't have to pay anything upfront
    • Serverless deployment - it gets executed only when request comes and we pay only for the time the request is getting executed
    • Integrates well with AWS CloudWatch triggers so it is easy to setup scheduled tasks like cron jobs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Amazon AWS
    • The choices on AMIs, instance types and additional configuration can be overwhelming for any non-DevOps person.
    • The pricing information should be more clear (than only providing the hourly cost) when launching the instance. AWS DynamoDB gives an estimated monthly cost when creating tables, and I would love to see similar cost estimation showing on EC2 instances individually, as not all developers gets access to the actual bills.
    • The term for reserving instances are at least 12 months. With instance types changing so fast and better instances coming out every other day, it's really hard to commit to an existing instance type for 1 or more years at a time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • Limited to the frameworks and configurations that AWS supports. There is no native way to use Elastic Beanstalk to deploy a Go application behind Nginx, for example.
    • It's not always clear what's changed on an underlying system when AWS updates an EB stack; the new version is announced, but AWS does not say what specifically changed in the underlying configuration. This can have unintended consequences and result in additional work in order to figure out what changes were made.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • Developing test cases for Lambda functions can be difficult. For functions that require some sort of input it can be tough to develop the proper payload and event for a test.
    • For the uninitiated, deploying functions with Infrastructure as Code tools can be a challenging undertaking.
    • Logging the output of a function feels disjointed from running the function in the console. A tighter integration with operational logging would be appreciated, perhaps being able to view function logs from the Lambda console instead of having to navigate over to CloudWatch.
    • Sometimes its difficult to determine the correct permissions needed for Lambda execution from other AWS services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Amazon AWS
    As our technology grows, it makes more sense to individually provision each server rather than have it done via beanstalk. There are several reasons to do so, which I cannot explain without further diving into the architecture itself, but I can tell you this. With automation, you also loose the flexibility to morph the system for your specific needs. So if you expect that in future you need more customization to your deployment process, then there is a good chance that you might try to do things individually rather than use an automation like beanstalk.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Amazon AWS
    You an start using EC2 instances immediately, is so easy and intuitive to start using them, EC2 has wizard to create the EC2 instances in the web browser or if you are code savvy you can create them with simple line in the CLI or using an SDK. Once you are comfortable using EC2, you can even automate the process.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    The overall usability is good enough, as far as the scaling, interactive UI and logging system is concerned, could do a lot better when it comes to the efficiency, in case of complicated node logics and complicated node architectures. It can have better software compatibility and can try to support collaboration with more softwares
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    I give it a seven is usability because it's AWS. Their UI's are always clunkier than the competition and their documentation is rather cumbersome. There's SO MUCH to dig through and it's a gamble if you actually end up finding the corresponding info if it will actually help. Like I said before, going to google with a specific problem is likely a better route because AWS is quite ubiquitous and chances are you're not the first to encounter the problem. That being said, using SAM (Serverless application model) and it's SAM Local environment makes running local instances of your Lambdas in dev environments painless and quite fun. Using Nodejs + Lambda + SAM Local + VS Code debugger = AWESOME.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Amazon AWS
    AWS's support is good overall. Not outstanding, but better than average. We have had very little reason to engage with AWS support but in our limited experience, the staff has been knowledgeable, timely and helpful. The only negative is actually initiating a service request can be a bit of a pain.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    As I described earlier it has been really cost effective and really easy for fellow developers who don't want to waste weeks and weeks into learning and manually deploying stuff which basically takes month to create and go live with the Minimal viable product (MVP). With AWS Beanstalk within a week a developer can go live with the Minimal viable product easily.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    Amazon consistently provides comprehensive and easy-to-parse documentation of all AWS features and services. Most development team members find what they need with a quick internet search of the AWS documentation available online. If you need advanced support, though, you might need to engage an AWS engineer, and that could be an unexpected (or unwelcome) expense.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Amazon AWS
    - Do as many experiments as you can before you commit on using beanstalk or other AWS features. - Keep future state in mind. Think through what comes next, and if that is technically possible to do so. - Always factor in cost in terms of scaling. - We learned a valuable lesson when we wanted to go multi-region, because then we realized many things needs to change in code. So if you plan on using this a lot, factor multiple regions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Amazon AWS
    Amazon EC2 is super flexible compared to the PaaS offerings like Heroku Platform and Google App Engine since with Amazon EC2, we have access to the terminal. In terms of pricing, it's basically just the same as Google Compute Engine. The deciding factor is Amazon EC2's native integration with other AWS services since they're all in the same cloud platform.
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    We also use Heroku and it is a great platform for smaller projects and light Node.js services, but we have found that in terms of cost, the Elastic Beanstalk option is more affordable for the projects that we undertake. The fact that it sits inside of the greater AWS Cloud offering also compels us to use it, since integration is simpler. We have also evaluated Microsoft Azure and gave up trying to get an extremely basic implementation up and running after a few days of struggling with its mediocre user interface and constant issues with documentation being outdated. The authentication model is also badly broken and trying to manage resources is a pain. One cannot compare Azure with anything that Amazon has created in the cloud space since Azure really isn't a mature platform and we are always left wanting when we have to interface with it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    AWS Lambda is good for short running functions, and ideally in response to events within AWS. Google App Engine is a more robust environment which can have complex code running for long periods of time, and across more than one instance of hardware. Google App Engine allows for both front-end and back-end infrastructure, while AWS Lambda is only for small back-end functions
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Amazon AWS
    • It reduced the need for heavy on-premises instances. Also, it completely eliminates maintenance of the machine. Their SLA criteria are also matching business needs. Overall IAAS is the best option when information is not so crucial to post on the cloud.
    • It makes both horizontal and vertical scaling really easy. This keeps your infrastructure up and running even while you are increasing the capacity or facing more traffic. This leads to having better customer satisfaction.
    • If you do not choose your instance type suitable for your business, it may incur lots of extra costs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • till now we had not Calculated ROI as the project is still evolving and we had to keep on changing the environment implementation
    • it meets our purpose of quick deployment as compared to on-premises deployment
    • till now we look good as we also controlled our expenses which increased suddenly in the middle of deployment activity
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Amazon AWS
    • Positive - Only paying for when code is run, unlike virtual machines where you pay always regardless of processing power usage.
    • Positive - Scalability and accommodating larger amounts of demand is much cheaper. Instead of scaling up virtual machines and increasing the prices you pay for that, you are just increasing the number of times your lambda function is run.
    • Negative - Debugging/troubleshooting, and developing for lambda functions take a bit more time to get used to, and migrating code from virtual machines and normal processes to Lambda functions can take a bit of time.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots