TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Anaconda

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AAnaconda is an enterprise Python platform that provides access to open-source Python and R packages used in AI, data science, and machine learning. These enterprise-grade solutions are used by corporate, research, and academic institutions for competitive advantage and research.

    $0

    per month

    WebStorm

    Score9.6 out of 10
    N/AWebStorm is an integrated development environment (IDE) by JetBrains. Designed for JavaScript and TypeScript development, WebStorm also aims to make it easy to tackle the most challenging tasks. Whether resolving Git merge conflicts or renaming a symbol across multiple files, it takes just a few clicks.

    $0

    per year

    PyCharm

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/APyCharm is an extensive Integrated Development Environment (IDE) for Python developers. Its arsenal includes intelligent code completion, error detection, and rapid problem-solving features, all of which aim to bolster efficiency. The product supports programmers in composing orderly and maintainable code by offering PEP8 checks, testing assistance, intelligent refactorings, and inspections. Moreover, it caters to web development frameworks like Django and Flask by providing framework…

    $9.90

    per month per user

    Pricing
    AnacondaWebStormPyCharm
    Editions & Modules
    Free Tier
    $0
    per month
    Starter Tier
    $15
    per month per user
    Business
    $50
    per month per user
    Custom
    Contact Sales
    Individual Non-Commercial
    $0
    per year
    Individual
    $6.90
    per month
    Bussiness
    $15.90
    per month per user
    Individual
    $69
    per year
    Business
    $159
    per year per user
    For Individuals
    $99
    per year per user
    All Products Pack for Organizations
    $249
    per year per user
    All Products Pack for Individuals
    $289
    per year per user
    For Organizations
    $779
    per year per user
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    AnacondaWebStormPyCharm
    Free Trial
    NoYesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    YesNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details———
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    AnacondaWebStormPyCharm
    Considered Multiple Products
    Anaconda
    Chose Anaconda
    It is almost dishonest to compare Anaconda with PyCharm as they do different things in their basic forms unless you spend a lot of time configuring plugins on your PyCharm environment. Anaconda has a lot of things ready and you just need to install your libs and dependencies.
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    Some analyzed tools, such as PyCharm and Spyder, are simpler to use but still do not have all the libraries needed for those starting out in data science--or in institutions that need to grow in that direction. Anaconda is more robust but stable, more complete, and the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    I know that PyCharm is a IDE and Anaconda is a distribution. However I use Anaconda largely due to Jupyter Notebook, which more or less does the same job as PyCharm. 1 year ago I decided to use Anaconda (Jupiyer Notebook) as it is easier to use it as a beginner(at least my …
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    Anaconda is very strong in the environment and version control that make data science work much easier. The only thing that might be comparable to Anaconda would be using Kubernetes to control Docker. Another potential improvement would be replacing spyder with PyCharm and Atom …
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    Anaconda is way easier to set-up. On Anaconda we have users working on Machine Learning in minutes, where on PyCharm is takes a lot longer to set-up and often involves getting help from IT. PyCharm is easier to integrate with Code repositories (such as GitHub), so if that's …
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    There are several reasons why Anaconda is better to use for me including that it is much easier to use than Baycharm. Also, the user interface is not as complicated as that of Baycharm. Even Anaconda does not slow down my device, using PaySharm slowed down my device in an …
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    In Anaconda, [it is easy] to find and install the required libraries. Here, we can work on multiple projects with different sets of the environment. [It is] easy to create the notebook for developing the ML model and deployment. Right now, it is the best data science version …
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    Free ware, better design ease of use
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    On top of all the software that I have used, Anaconda is the best because in Anaconda we have built-in packages that provide no headache to install packages and we can design a separate environment for different projects. Anaconda has versions made for special use cases. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    Compare Anaconda to Unix coding system. You can use PIP to install and create requirement.txt to replace environment.yml to avoid using Anaconda. However, Anaconda is such an excellent tool to maintain your environment and check the version of your package and update the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    I like SpyDER, which comes with Anaconda better for its intuitive layout and variable explorer options.
    Incentivized
    Chose Anaconda
    Anaconda is the best Python environment because you have all the things you need all in one places, at the reach of your hand. You can download and manage libraries as you wish and is very easy to create new projects and API's for all your stuff.

    It's Multiplatform so you don't …
    Incentivized
    JetBrains
    Chose WebStorm
    While vscode is a great product by itself, I prefer WebStorm as I found it more intuitive to use out of the box. I also feel error detection and linting is producing better results on WebStorm. Keeping an IDE with out-of-the-box keybinding and common plugins allows me …
    Incentivized
    Chose WebStorm
    Microsoft VS code has some similar features as WebStorm, but too basic and lack of a lot of "in-depth" features, it is not kind of "All-In-One" IDE officially speaking, so eventually we find out WebStorm meets our needs much better
    Incentivized
    Chose WebStorm
    Atom is free to use, unlike WebStorm. However, as it is free it is also open-source. The drawback is that improving and maintaining the product can take time and updates are not as frequent as in WebStorm. Atom's UI is very appealing and customizable. Atom also has GitHub …
    Incentivized
    Chose WebStorm
    I have loved using WebStorm because it has so many features that are helpful not only to those just starting out, but also to veteran programmers. WebStorm also has free educational licensing, which has been integral in creating a professional environment in my classroom. It …
    Incentivized
    Chose WebStorm
    More configurable.
    Comes with code liners ( no plugin is needed)
    Karma test runner is supported by default
    Incentivized
    Chose WebStorm
    Others are free IntelliJ WebStorm is not.
    Incentivized
    Chose WebStorm
    WebStorm is a better all around IDE when you are building out a solution. Visual Studio Code, Sublime, these are great for single files or for quick demos. But once we sit down to create a project, we fire up WebStorm.
    Incentivized
    JetBrains
    Chose PyCharm
    PyCharm is the best tool to switch between different projects. One can connect to various technologies at a time. Package and plugin installation is easy. Dark and light mode helps in working according to the mood. One can extend it to IntelliJ, depending on the need for custom …
    Incentivized
    Chose PyCharm
    I've used Sublime, VSCode, Wing IDE, Visual Studio, IntelliJ, WebStorm. For Java development, Intellij is best - being built by the same company as PyCharm it provides a helpful familiarity. The same can be said for WebStorm, although more lightweight IDEs are usually …
    Incentivized
    Chose PyCharm
    Simply one of the best IDE's of our time. It has a lot of features, a big user base, and a professional developer team behind it. It simply surpasses most of its competitors, as there are not too many Python-specialized IDEs anyway.
    Incentivized
    Chose PyCharm
    PyCharm was selected due to it's first class treatment of Python. Visual Studio is more general "Do everything" IDE which contains a lot of features our team didn't need. PyCharm strikes the balance of power and complexity.
    Incentivized
    Chose PyCharm
    What differentiates PyCharm from other products is that it is built for a particular language (Python) and works great while doing it, without losing efficiency with the rest of languages. It's simple, easy to use, fast and efficient, what else could you need?
    Incentivized
    Chose PyCharm
    I needed a Python dedicated solution Pycharm is the best suited, giving no hassle in setting up and providing an off the shelf solution for python development. Using Eclipse is cumbersome, some additional plugins must be installed and configured
    Incentivized
    Chose PyCharm
    There are many other good editors are there in market but PyCharm has great support for Python and Python frameworks because its designed for Python.
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    96%
    Would buy again
    24 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    16 Answers
    96%
    Would buy again
    23 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    23 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    15 Answers
    96%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    25 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    16 Answers
    96%
    Happy with the feature set
    23 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    94%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    15 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    15 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    16 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    21 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    15 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    23 Answers
    Features
    AnacondaWebStormPyCharm
    Platform Connectivity
    Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Anaconda and WebStorm and PyCharm
    Feature
    Anaconda
    9.3
    25 Ratings
    11% above category average
    WebStorm
    -
    Ratings
    PyCharm
    -
    Ratings
    Connect to Multiple Data Sources9.822 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Extend Existing Data Sources8.024 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic Data Format Detection9.721 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    MDM Integration9.614 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Exploration
    Comparison of Data Exploration features of Anaconda and WebStorm and PyCharm
    Feature
    Anaconda
    8.5
    25 Ratings
    1% above category average
    WebStorm
    -
    Ratings
    PyCharm
    -
    Ratings
    Visualization9.025 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Interactive Data Analysis8.024 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Preparation
    Comparison of Data Preparation features of Anaconda and WebStorm and PyCharm
    Feature
    Anaconda
    9.0
    26 Ratings
    9% above category average
    WebStorm
    -
    Ratings
    PyCharm
    -
    Ratings
    Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment8.823 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Transformations8.026 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Encryption9.719 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Built-in Processors9.620 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform Data Modeling
    Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Anaconda and WebStorm and PyCharm
    Feature
    Anaconda
    9.2
    24 Ratings
    8% above category average
    WebStorm
    -
    Ratings
    PyCharm
    -
    Ratings
    Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools9.023 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Machine Learning8.921 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Single platform for multiple model development10.024 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Self-Service Model Delivery9.019 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Model Deployment
    Comparison of Model Deployment features of Anaconda and WebStorm and PyCharm
    Feature
    Anaconda
    9.5
    21 Ratings
    10% above category average
    WebStorm
    -
    Ratings
    PyCharm
    -
    Ratings
    Flexible Model Publishing Options10.021 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security, Governance, and Cost Controls9.020 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    AnacondaWebStormPyCharm
    Small Businesses
    RapidMiner
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Visual Studio
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Visual Studio
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Jupyter Notebook
    Score8.6 out of 10
    PyCharm
    Score9.3 out of 10
    IntelliJ IDEA
    Score9.2 out of 10
    Enterprises
    IBM Watson Studio
    Score10 out of 10
    IntelliJ IDEA
    Score9.2 out of 10
    WebStorm
    Score9.6 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    AnacondaWebStormPyCharm
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (38 ratings)
    9.2
    (31 ratings)
    9.6
    (42 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    9.6
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.9
    (9 ratings)
    9.4
    (8 ratings)
    8.3
    (13 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    AnacondaWebStormPyCharm
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Anaconda
    I have asked all my juniors to work with Anaconda and Pycharm only, as this is the best combination for now. Coming to use cases: 1. When you have multiple applications using multiple Python variants, it is a really good tool instead of Venv (I never like it). 2. If you have to work on multiple tools and you are someone who needs to work on data analytics, development, and machine learning, this is good. 3. If you have to work with both R and Python, then also this is a good tool, and it provides support for both.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    Groups that use a [variety] of development environments (.net, python, web), Jebrain's products and Webstorm, in particular, are a great choice for productivity. If your developers are accustom to another IDE it might be better for all to sync on the same one. I wouldn't take the cost aspect as a consideration. A productive developer is far more important.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    PyCharm is well suited to developing and deploying Python applications in the cloud using Kubernetes or serverless pipelines. The integration with GitLab is great; merges and rebates are easily done and help the developer move quickly. The search engine that allows you to search inside your code is also great. It is less appropriate for other languages.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Anaconda
    • Anaconda is a one-stop destination for important data science and programming tools such as Jupyter, Spider, R etc.
    • Anaconda command prompt gave flexibility to use and install multiple libraries in Python easily.
    • Jupyter Notebook, a famous Anaconda product is still one of the best and easy to use product for students like me out there who want to practice coding without spending too much money.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    • Includes a built in spell checker to eliminate time wasted searching for small mistakes.
    • Provides a drop down menu of options complete with keyboard shortcuts that allow for streamlined programming.
    • Identifies when variables are named differently, allowing for cohesive work without the scrolling.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    • Git integration is really essential as it allows anyone to visually see the local and remote changes, compare revisions without the need for complex commands.
    • Complex debugging tools are basked into the IDE. Controls like break on exception are sometimes very helpful to identify errors quickly.
    • Multiple runtimes - Python, Flask, Django, Docker are native the to IDE. This makes development and debugging and even more seamless.
    • Integrates with Jupyter and Markdown files as well. Side by side rendering and editing makes it simple to develop such files.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Anaconda
    • It can have a cloud interface to store the work.
    • Compatible for large size files.
    • I used R Studio for building Machine Learning models, Many times when I tried to run the entire code together the software would crash. It would lead to loss of data and changes I made.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    • The popup file search sometimes frustrates me. It caps the number of results, and sometimes it isn't clear that it simply stopped looking. I also used to have trouble finding string occurrences that I knew were in my project, but I think they've made improvements in this area recently.
    • Being a AAA IDE, WebStorm can be a memory hog. If I don't kill it every few days, it can get really slow. I would love to see performance improvements.
    • Speaking of performance, WebStorm can take a long time to launch. I'd like to see improvements in launch times.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    • The biggest complaint I have about PyCharm is that it can use a lot of RAM which slows down the computer / IDE. I use the paid version, and have otherwise found nothing to complain about the interface, utility, and capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Anaconda
    It's really good at data processing, but needs to grow more in publishing in a way that a non-programmer can interact with. It also introduces confusion for programmers that are familiar with normal Python processes which are slightly different in Anaconda such as virtualenvs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    It's an irreplaceable part of my toolkit and isn't that expensive per year.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    It's perfect for our needs, cuts development time, is really helpful for newbies to understand projects structure
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Anaconda
    I am giving this rating because I have been using this tool since 2017, and I was in college at that time. Initially, I hesitated to use it as I was not very aware of the workings of Python and how difficult it is to manage its dependency from project to project. Anaconda really helped me with that. The first machine-learning model that I deployed on the Live server was with Anaconda only. It was so managed that I only installed libraries from the requirement.txt file, and it started working. There was no need to manually install cuda or tensor flow as it was a very difficult job at that time. Graphical data modeling also provides tools for it, and they can be easily saved to the system and used anywhere.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    Great in debugging, testing, developing and maintaining softwares in a number of languages. Great support for many languages and their syntaxes. Great support of many third party extensions and plugins like GIT and html plugins. The RAM usage of WebStorm however could be really improved, it literally takes almost all of the RAM of my machine with 16GB RAM
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    It's pretty easy to use, but if it's your first time using it, you need time to adapt. Nevertheless, it has a lot of options, and everything is pretty easy to find. The console has a lot of advantages and lets you accelerate your development from the first day.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Anaconda
    Anaconda provides fast support, and a large number of users moderate its online community. This enables any questions you may have to be answered in a timely fashion, regardless of the topic. The fact that it is based in a Python environment only adds to the size of the online community.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    I gave this rating because I have never needed their customer support, which is the highest level of support I suppose. When a product works just fine out of the box and everything you may need is well documented, it's a paradise for the customer. But I've seen some questions asked on their portal, and I've seen thorough answers given to the questions and the willingness to support the customer with follow-ups and everything else.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    I rate 10/10 because I have never needed a direct customer support from the JetBrains so far. Whenever and for whatever kind of problems I came across, I have been able to resolve it within the internet community, simply by Googling because turns out most of the time, it was me who lacked the proper information to use the IDE or simply make the proper configuration. I have never came across a bug in PyCharm either so it deserves 10/10 for overall support
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Anaconda
    No answers on this topic
    JetBrains
    Highly recommend the JetBrains Toolbox, it remembers your recent projects and launches from the task bar.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Anaconda
    I have experience using RStudio oustide of Anaconda. RStudio can be installed via anaconda, but I like to use RStudio separate from Anaconda when I am worin in R. I tend to use Anaconda for python and RStudio for working in R. Although installing libraries and packages can sometimes be tricky with both RStudio and Anaconda, I like installing R packages via RStudio. However, for anything python-related, Anaconda is my go to!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    I think WebStorm is way ahead of open-source editors. Please don't get me wrong, I love open-source. But the other free editors have a lot of configuration which blocks my whole coding experience. Take "Atom" for example. I used it for about 3 months, but in that time I had to update the plugins hundreds of time, and for every little thing (e.g. linter) I had to download a community plugin, and with each plugin atom would get a little slow. Take "Eclipse" for another example, which is very suited for Java, but not so suited for JavaScript. Sublime was good, but WebStorm comes with many exciting features that I did not find in sublime/notepad.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    When it comes to development and debugging PyCharm is better than Spyder as it provides good debugging support and top-quality code completion suggestions. Compared to Jupiter notebook it's easy to install required packages in PyCharm, also PyChram is a good option when we want to write production-grade code because it provides required suggestions.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Anaconda
    • It has helped our organization to work collectively faster by using Anaconda's collaborative capabilities and adding other collaboration tools over.
    • By having an easy access and immediate use of libraries, developing times has decreased more than 20 %
    • There's an enormous data scientist shortage. Since Anaconda is very easy to use, we have to be able to convert several professionals into the data scientist. This is especially true for an economist, and this my case. I convert myself to Data Scientist thanks to my econometrics knowledge applied with Anaconda.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    • Saves lot of time when we are finding the text or files.
    • Easy to work with for support projects.
    • Nice code completion feature.
    • It's all in one solution for both front end, back end and database solution to work with.
    • Initial learning curve is required to use the workbench.
    • Documentation can be improved better probably adding videos, would be helpful for visual person.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    JetBrains
    • PyCharm has a very positive ROI for our BU. It has increased developer productivity exponentially.
    • Software quality has significantly improved. We are able to refactor/test/debug the code quicker/faster/better.
    • Our business unit is able to deliver faster. Customers are happier than ever.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    WebStorm Screenshots

    Screenshot of Code CompletionScreenshot of JavaScript DebuggingScreenshot of Quick DocumentationScreenshot of Version Control IntegrationScreenshot of the Out-of-the-box Experience