Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Anaplan
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Anaplan is a scenario planning and analysis platform designed to optimize decision-making in complex business environments so that enterprises can outpace their competition and the market. By building connections and collaboration across organizational silos, the Anaplan platform surfaces key insights.N/A
FloQast
Score 9.1 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
FloQast offers their financial close software to streamline accounting month end close, simply providing automation around reconciliation and eliminating human error, and visibility via a close status dashboard, as well as providing a complete audit trail.N/A
Pricing
AnaplanFloQast
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AnaplanFloQast
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalRequired
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AnaplanFloQast
Considered Both Products
Anaplan

No answer on this topic

FloQast
Chose FloQast
Having FloQast automatically pulls updates from excel files saved in our shared folders is key instead of having to upload new files as we've done in the past with other comparable products
Features
AnaplanFloQast
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
7.4
232 Ratings
3% below category average
FloQast
-
Ratings
Pixel Perfect reports6.47 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizable dashboards8.0232 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.96 Ratings00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
9.1
8 Ratings
12% above category average
FloQast
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis9.18 Ratings00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities9.18 Ratings00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration9.18 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
8.4
237 Ratings
3% above category average
FloQast
-
Ratings
Publish to Web8.67 Ratings00 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.2235 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Versioning9.0206 Ratings00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling7.98 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
8.2
8 Ratings
7% above category average
FloQast
-
Ratings
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)9.17 Ratings00 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization9.17 Ratings00 Ratings
Predictive Analytics6.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
9.2
243 Ratings
7% above category average
FloQast
-
Ratings
Multi-User Support (named login)9.18 Ratings00 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.4243 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.18 Ratings00 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control9.593 Ratings00 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)9.18 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
7.4
229 Ratings
2% below category average
FloQast
-
Ratings
Responsive Design for Web Access8.1220 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Application7.2206 Ratings00 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile7.6214 Ratings00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
9.0
341 Ratings
9% above category average
FloQast
-
Ratings
Long-term financial planning9.3316 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial budgeting9.4320 Ratings00 Ratings
Forecasting9.2329 Ratings00 Ratings
Scenario modeling9.2331 Ratings00 Ratings
Management reporting7.7330 Ratings00 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
7.8
290 Ratings
1% below category average
FloQast
7.9
126 Ratings
1% below category average
Financial data consolidation8.4270 Ratings7.776 Ratings
Journal entries and reports7.7225 Ratings8.756 Ratings
Multi-currency management7.312 Ratings4.539 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations7.39 Ratings00 Ratings
Minority Ownership7.38 Ratings00 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting8.1258 Ratings00 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails8.8271 Ratings9.592 Ratings
Customizable Workflows00 Ratings8.8106 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
8.1
311 Ratings
1% above category average
FloQast
-
Ratings
Financial Statement Reporting8.9288 Ratings00 Ratings
Management Reporting8.3302 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting7.9281 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting8.214 Ratings00 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing7.31 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
8.9
331 Ratings
10% above category average
FloQast
-
Ratings
Personalized dashboards8.3325 Ratings00 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards8.9309 Ratings00 Ratings
KPIs9.120 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis9.2288 Ratings00 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting9.1298 Ratings00 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data9.114 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Anaplan
8.4
338 Ratings
1% above category average
FloQast
-
Ratings
Flat file integration9.3328 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel data integration8.3305 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources7.8288 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AnaplanFloQast
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Tipalti
Tipalti
Score 7.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.5 out of 10
Cube
Cube
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.9 out of 10
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AnaplanFloQast
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(344 ratings)
8.9
(153 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(37 ratings)
8.0
(7 ratings)
Usability
8.9
(75 ratings)
8.3
(6 ratings)
Availability
9.0
(7 ratings)
6.7
(4 ratings)
Performance
9.1
(7 ratings)
7.4
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
4.2
(27 ratings)
9.6
(10 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.1
(6 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Online Training
8.2
(7 ratings)
7.4
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(26 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Configurability
9.1
(5 ratings)
7.3
(3 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.1
(3 ratings)
7.4
(3 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.2
(7 ratings)
8.5
(4 ratings)
Professional Services
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.9
(4 ratings)
7.4
(3 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.7
(4 ratings)
7.4
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
AnaplanFloQast
Likelihood to Recommend
Anaplan
I've implemented a number of projects for Anaplan for Sales Performance Management use cases. It is obviously built for financial planning, but it allows for a lot of flexibility for territory and quota, ICM, sales forecasting, and other important use cases. Territory and Quota is very powerful in the tool as it organize complex assignment structures into hierarchies for easier analysis and reporting.
Read full review
FloQast
I used another vendor for close management before, and comparing the two, FloQast is easier to use and the site navigation is much easier. The looks and feels of the site are more engaging and pleasant. As mentioned before in the previous question, their Journal Entry posting functionality is not suited for a company with multiple entities since it only allows you to book an entry when debits and credits are hitting the same entity
Read full review
Pros
Anaplan
  • Anaplan removes the time consuming process of integrating the results of individual spreadsheets.
  • Anaplan facilitates the standardization of assumptions across all sub-processes
  • Anaplan provides full transparency of the calculations and source inputs
  • Anaplan allows us to automate certain planning processes that would have been impossible when relying on the computational capabilities of an individual computer.
Read full review
FloQast
  • Provides a clear status of the month end close.
  • Allows us to analyze tasks by team member and reassign as needed.
  • It syncs with our ERP Netsuite to ensure balance sheet reconciliations can be tied out directly.
  • It also connects with Slack to notify users of key deadlines and changes in review status for team tasks.
Read full review
Cons
Anaplan
  • Some end users don't spend the required amount of time to familiar themselves with Anaplan.
  • Auditability, while good in theory, can be lacking and clunky when needed.
  • Model building can become convoluted over time, leading to confusion over the specific use of line items.
Read full review
FloQast
  • A setting to allow for attachments to automatically be opened within the app (Adobe, Excel, etc.) rather than as a separate tab in the browser
  • Some of our tasks are quarterly or annual so assigning a very specific date would be helpful
  • Eliminate the need of "closing" review notes. Once we change the status to Resolved, that should be sufficient. Make Resolved and Closed one and the same
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Anaplan
Anaplan is a very strong multi-dimensional modeling tool that provides a calculation engine to empower a complex planning process. It is fairly easy to learn for those with experience in similar tools, or excel. It forces structure and auditability that spread sheets do not have, along with extensive security capabilities
Read full review
FloQast
It has proven to enhance our procedures with closing. It is an effective tool that I would recommend to create a more efficient closing procedure and get the team more aligned. It increases the accountability among the staff and helps to keep us on task and on time. It is easy to sign into and has reminder emails for tasks that are coming up or late.
Read full review
Usability
Anaplan
As a user it is a very simple tool, but at the same time with a very mature and powerful calculation engine. It is very easy to switch from excel or traditional tools with added capabilities of multi dimensionality and real time calculation engine to see quick insights needed to create plans and scenarios
Read full review
FloQast
FloQast is incredibly intuitive and easy to use. The only reason I don't give it a 10 is that the Flux Analysis feature is not great in terms of getting the information into the system. Once it's in, fantastic! But some work is needed
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Anaplan
There are very few outages. Maintenance is scheduled on two or three Saturdays per month, so as not to affect businesses. When there is an outage, users are kept informed of progress to restore the platform and typically this takes no more than an hour. Anaplan customer support is very responsive if we ever have questions about platform issues
Read full review
FloQast
We have only noticed a slight slow down in accessing FloQast on a couple of occasions (near the beginning of a month when many people were likely trying to get online to close their books). The issue has always resolved itself with three to five minutes, so it's never been a hinderance.
Read full review
Performance
Anaplan
Everything is calculated in memory in the cloud. It's nearly instantaneous updates when you make changes. The only time things get a little slow is when you have a massive model with very intricate calculations...but "slow" for Anaplan is not what I would call "slow" for something like Hyperion. We used to have Hyperion calcs that ran for 60 mins before you could use data. The equivalent would be 60 seconds in Anaplan.
Read full review
FloQast
FloQast's performance is great. The pages always load quickly, and reports are completed fast! I've never noticed any slowdown in our ERP from the interface with FloQast.
Read full review
Support Rating
Anaplan
Support quality has dropped since Thoma Bravo has taken over. I think some serious re-focus needs to happen here -- part of the beauty of being in the Anaplan community was how involved you felt in it before. Before I didn't dread sending a support ticket, now I am starting to.
Read full review
FloQast
They are rapid in their response. If they can't immediately offer a solution, they continue to keep in contact with you to let you know where they are in resolving your issues. The staff is friendly & speaks to you in layman's terms, not so high-tech that you can't understand
Read full review
In-Person Training
Anaplan
In my opinion, in-person training is always the best if you have the option to do so. This allows real-time interactions with the instructions, whereas the online training I took required me to write-down questions, email them, and wait for responses. This slows down the process, as you can imagine. That said, in-person training is an extra cost and it likely isn't needed for everyone. I would suggest selecting a small number of people to take in-person training and then having them act as mentors to the rest of your team. That way, as the rest of the team takes the online training, they have a resource to help them in real time.
Read full review
FloQast
The FloQast team members are just so personable. FloQast has clearly done a great job hiring people who are not just good at what they do, but are also fun to work with! They have placed people in the right roles and the customer benefits from this. I have enjoyed every opportunity I've had to work with a FloQast team member on training.
Read full review
Online Training
Anaplan
Anaplan training materials are clear, simple, easy to understand and to follow. Visuals are excellent. The vendor is good at updating training materials in a timely manner and encouraging users and administrators to keep coming back to Academy site for refresher courses or new feature courses. I really like their interactive diagrams
Read full review
FloQast
The online training is good. But like all online, pre-recorded training, it is never quite as good as in-person or live training where one can ask questions or get clarification. That said, FloQast has an extensive training library and most of the time, if one finds they need help on a topic, it can be answered by going to the online training and watching appropriate recording.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Anaplan
One key insight from implementing Anaplan is that success comes from focusing on designing the process, not just building the model. Anaplan is extremely flexible—there are very few planning scenarios it cannot support—but that flexibility means the project needs strong governance, clear ownership of requirements, and a well-defined data model. When those foundations are in place, implementations are fast, iterations are easy, and users can quickly see value.
In our projects, both Financial Planning and Integrated Business Planning models were adopted smoothly because we involved business users early, kept the model design intuitive, and leveraged Anaplan’s Excel-like syntax and user-friendly dashboards. The result was more efficient day-to-day work, reduced manual tasks, and increased collaboration across teams. In short: when you combine Anaplan’s flexibility with a structured implementation approach, adoption and value realization happen quickly.
Read full review
FloQast
Implementation occured before I started with the company (but despite the instruction to skip the question if I did not participate, the site required I put in a rating in order to move on to the next page)
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Anaplan
Anaplan is more powerful than Pigment considering that it is an Enterprise class system and is able to manage bigger data sets. Anaplan allows for advanced scenario modeling and formula capabilities along with custom reporting functionalities. Anaplan has proven its capabilities and stability across various use cases and across bigger enterprises when compared to Pigment which is still in earlier phases of its development
Read full review
FloQast
At the time we picked FloQast, they were the most cost effective and easiest tool to use. Fast forward a little bit, and Numeric has come to market. I really lie Numeric to be honest and feel that their pricing is better and for that lower pricing, they include more functions. However, we continued with FloQast for ease of continuity and my team is time strapped. What that said, FloQast is great - nothing wrong with it other than it could be cheaper.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Anaplan
No answers on this topic
FloQast
I had no control over the contract
Read full review
Scalability
Anaplan
We have managed to leverage Anaplan for financial planning and forecasting across the business. It is now used by almost every department, with more than 50 users (but I know of companies that have hundreds of users) and still the platform is quick and reliable. It is easy to make changes to divisions and departments or add users and apply different user settings - the core part of the model is not affected and end users can continue their work without any disruption
Read full review
FloQast
We started using it with one client/customer and now use it with fourteen entities and plan to add two more in the next couple of months. It has made it possible to grow our business without hiring additional personnel. We can do more work with the same number of people
Read full review
Return on Investment
Anaplan
  • Anaplan's implementation led to a significant reduction in planning cycle errors and bugs, streamlining processes and improving overall accuracy in data inputs
  • Standardizing the planning process and enabling cross-functional collaboration through Anaplan enhanced our ability to adapt swiftly to changing business needs, resulting in improved agility in decision-making
  • The platform's capabilities, especially in Demand Planning and Supply Chain, positively impacted our ROI by optimizing resource allocation and solving complex business problems efficiently across multiple functions
Read full review
FloQast
  • Floqast has reduced our closing schedule by roughly 15-20% of the time it took us beforehand.
  • The product has been very beneficial for us during audit time when we can easily demonstrate our control workflows on reconciliation and task approvals.
  • I can update our CFO at any point in time how we are trending towards close and can coordinate with finance as to the moment journal entries have been completed
Read full review
ScreenShots

Anaplan Screenshots

Screenshot of a preview of the Anaplan login page.Screenshot of a preview of an Anaplan home page.Screenshot of a preview of an Anaplan board.

FloQast Screenshots

Screenshot of the analytics that displays progress throughout the closeScreenshot of flux analysisScreenshot of reconciliations