Anaplan - the planning solution you need
Updated November 03, 2025

Anaplan - the planning solution you need

Alexander Denchev | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Anaplan

We use Anaplan as our core platform to design and implement connected planning solutions for enterprise clients. Most of the organizations we work with struggle with fragmented planning processes, reliance on spreadsheets or legacy systems, and slow decision cycles due to manual data consolidation.
Anaplan allows us to centralize data, automate workflows, and deliver real-time visibility across functions such as Commercial/Connected Business Planning (CBP) and FP&A. Our current scope includes multiple live CBP implementations across several business units, enabling faster scenario modeling, better alignment between teams, and more informed decision-making. We are also expanding into FP&A use cases, integrating Anaplan with complex enterprise system landscapes to create a fully connected planning ecosystem.

Pros

  • Simulation planning (FP&A, S&OP, etc)
  • Compensation planning
  • Constantly enhancing and evolving UI
  • Intuitive and easy to understand platform
  • Fast and early adoption among users
  • CoE planning
  • Process optimization
  • API integrations
  • Data Integration
  • Forecasting
  • Scenario planning & modeling

Cons

  • The way LISS works and can interact with other components
  • Can have more visualization (chart) options
  • The way the engine reacts to syntax errors (sometimes can take several minutes depending on model size and complexity)
  • Pages flexibility (in terms of possible and available functionalities as compared to old UX)
  • View filters when creating imports
  • Live syntax checks
  • Optimize the way text suggestion interacts with formulas (small bugs)
  • Flexibility
  • Ease of reporting
  • Availability to even non-trained personnel
  • UI/UX strength
  • Live dataflow and system updates
  • ROI > 200%
  • Lowering multiple process' time for completion significantly (half, in other instances more)
Anaplan’s overall usability is excellent, particularly for business users who need flexibility without depending on IT. The model-building experience is intuitive and uses a formula syntax similar to Excel, which significantly reduces the learning curve and speeds up user adoption. Dashboards are easy to navigate and can be tailored to different roles, enabling users to interact with data, perform what-if scenarios, and make decisions without navigating complex menus.
From an operational perspective, Anaplan enables organizations to simplify and automate previously manual planning processes. Data flows seamlessly across models, eliminating version control issues and reducing the need for offline spreadsheets. The platform also supports real-time collaboration, allowing multiple users to work in the same model simultaneously with immediate visibility into changes—ideal for cross-functional planning cycles.
Overall, Anaplan’s usability stands out because it strikes the balance between being powerful enough for complex enterprise planning and accessible enough for non-technical users to build and maintain models independently.
Anaplan and Pigment are both modern Connected Planning platforms, but they differ in maturity and depth. Pigment offers a very intuitive user experience with fast model setup, strong visual dashboards, and a modern interface that appeals to new planning teams or organizations prioritizing quick time-to-value. It’s well suited for smaller-to-mid-sized planning footprints or organizations that want to deploy standardized FP&A processes rapidly.
Anaplan, however, stands out in two key areas: enterprise scalability and depth of modeling. Its calculation engine handles complex, multi-dimensional models across regions, business units, and large datasets, making it ideal for enterprise use cases like incentive compensation, S&OP, and advanced scenario planning. In situations where planning requires sophisticated logic, cross-functional alignment, and multiple interconnected models, Anaplan consistently proves more robust and better suited for long-term strategic planning at scale.

Do you think Anaplan delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Anaplan's feature set?

Yes

Did Anaplan live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Anaplan go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Anaplan again?

Yes

In my experience, Anaplan is extremely well suited for complex, logic-driven planning processes where flexibility, cross-functional alignment, and rapid scenario modeling are critical. We’ve delivered highly successful implementations in areas such as Incentive Compensation Planning, S&OP, FP&A, and statistical forecasting for Annual Operating Plan (AOP) cycles. In these scenarios, Anaplan’s modeling engine and ability to connect data, drivers, and assumptions across teams allow users to iterate quickly and adapt the model as business needs evolve.
On the other hand, Anaplan is less appropriate for use cases that require heavy data storage, historization, or large transactional volumes. For example, we worked on a rebates calculation use case where the process relied primarily on storing and aggregating large datasets rather than performing iterative planning or scenario analysis. In this situation, the client was not leveraging Anaplan’s calculation and planning strengths, and a data warehouse or transactional system would have been a more efficient fit.

Anaplan Feature Ratings

Long-term financial planning
9
Financial budgeting
10
Forecasting
10
Scenario modeling
10
Management reporting
8
Financial data consolidation
9
Journal entries and reports
9
Local and consolidated reporting
9
Detailed Audit Trails
8
Financial Statement Reporting
9
Management Reporting
9
Excel-based Reporting
9
Personalized dashboards
9
Color-coded scorecards
9
Cost and profitability analysis
9
Key Performance Indicator setting
10
Flat file integration
10
Excel data integration
9
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources
8
Customizable dashboards
9
Publish to PDF
10
Report Versioning
9
Role-Based Security Model
10
Report-Level Access Control
8
Responsive Design for Web Access
8
Mobile Application
7
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile
7

Using Anaplan

25 - Sales, Marketing, Accounting, Technical - almost all areas of our line of work meet their needs satisfied to a good extent in Anaplan. Depending on the business case, there can be an entire model, or just a section of it for the users to work with and it brings significant value to their day-to-day work.
9 - The beauty of Anaplan is that (even though our case is not exact) there are not many specific significant skills required to understand and even develop in Anaplan. Basic understanding of Excel-like structure and syntax is more than enough, as model building is made easy to understand and work with once you roll into the matter.
  • Sales compensation
  • AOP creation
  • Statistical Forecast
  • Demand Management
  • FP&A
  • UAT tracking and easing the process for end users to test and confirm new rollouts
  • Project and capacity planning
  • Holiday and sick leave planning (overall HR assistance)
  • Project and capacity planning
In any line of work, a tool that is flexible and would allow different departments of your company to easily interact and exchange valuable insights, is highly anticipated and needed. For me, what Anaplan provides to a business, be it a smaller one or an enterprise customer, is an easily scaling, agile planning and modeling platform that can meet almost any need and give a high-end solution to the problems any company faces on a daily basis.

Evaluating Anaplan and Competitors

  • Product Features
  • Product Usability
  • Product Reputation
  • Prior Experience with the Product
The main reason is the ease of work with the tool, the implementation that requires a reasonable amount of technical understanding, but still can be done on a larger scale with non-technical personnel due to the learning path that the platform provides. The user experience has been tremendously improving in the past years and now the reporting is on par with some exceptional reporting platforms but at a less complex implementation curve.
I would focus on a more detailed analysis of the pros and cons of selecting the platform.

Anaplan Implementation

One key insight from implementing Anaplan is that success comes from focusing on designing the process, not just building the model. Anaplan is extremely flexible—there are very few planning scenarios it cannot support—but that flexibility means the project needs strong governance, clear ownership of requirements, and a well-defined data model. When those foundations are in place, implementations are fast, iterations are easy, and users can quickly see value.
In our projects, both Financial Planning and Integrated Business Planning models were adopted smoothly because we involved business users early, kept the model design intuitive, and leveraged Anaplan’s Excel-like syntax and user-friendly dashboards. The result was more efficient day-to-day work, reduced manual tasks, and increased collaboration across teams. In short: when you combine Anaplan’s flexibility with a structured implementation approach, adoption and value realization happen quickly.
Change management was a small part of the implementation and was well-handled - One of the key lessons we learned is that successful change management starts with clearly defined ownership. We established a governance structure early—assigning roles for model ownership, decision-making, and ongoing enhancements—to ensure accountability after go-live. Engaging key stakeholders throughout the project helped align expectations, secure buy-in, and avoid last-minute surprises.
We also learned that continuous enablement drives adoption. We implemented recurring training sessions and hands-on workshops to build internal Anaplan capability, ensuring users felt confident maintaining and evolving the model instead of relying on external support. After go-live, we introduced a structured process for evaluating, approving, and implementing model changes, which helped keep enhancements controlled, transparent, and aligned with business priorities.
  • Data quality (non-Anaplan related)
  • User adoption

Anaplan Training

Anaplan’s Academy training is well structured because it takes a progressive, hands-on approach to learning. Instead of heavy theory, the curriculum guides learners through real modeling exercises that mirror actual business use cases. Each course builds logically on the previous one—starting with foundational concepts like lists and modules, progressing to model building, and finally into advanced topics such as Connected Planning and governance. The structure is consistent and modular, making it easy for both new users and experienced model builders to navigate and learn at their own pace.
The training is also highly practical and directly tied to day-to-day work in Anaplan. Learners build real models, practice formula writing, and explore dashboards, which accelerates confidence and adoption. Certified paths (Model Builder → Solution Architect → Master Anaplanner) give a clear sense of progression, while the combination of guided exercises, knowledge checks, and community forums ensures that users can apply what they learn immediately. Overall, the Academy makes it easy for businesses to grow internal expertise and sustain Anaplan models without relying on external support.

Anaplan Support

I've had a fair share of reaching out to the support personnel, and they are really helpful every time, reaching out in a timely manner, providing materials and information that might help me solve my issue; and if that does not suffice, they always refer me to the proper escalation personnel for the next steps in solving my problems. Sometimes they tend to be a bit slow in the response, but that is not often.
ProsCons
Quick Resolution
Good followup
Knowledgeable team
Problems get solved
No escalation required
Support cares about my success
None
We did not, no specific reason to "why not", besides cost tracking.
One time i had an issue with a filtration of some items in a drop-down list on a UX page that was defaulting the scroll to the top every time i scroll down, and when i reported the issue, initially i was told that this is scheduled for a release as a bug; a day later i got reached out to by the support telling me the issue was fixed, and it was. Exceptional reaction and resolve time.

Using Anaplan

ProsCons
Like to use
Relatively simple
Easy to use
Technical support not required
Well integrated
Consistent
Quick to learn
Convenient
Feel confident using
Familiar
None
  • Forecasting
  • Budget planning
  • Cost tracking and planning
  • Workforce planning
  • Incentives and compensation planning
  • Scenario planning
  • Data warehousing and data storage

Comments

More Reviews of Anaplan