Anaplan - the planning solution you need
Overall Satisfaction with Anaplan
We implement solutions with the Anaplan tool for enterprise customers on a wide range of use cases that their line of work requires. The most common problems we aim to resolve are outdated processes using robust tools that are very time-consuming for the end user, as well as creating a stable connected planning experience for every branch of the organization. Our scope are multiple CBP implementations that are currently live, and have been helping our users make better decisions faster and easier. To update our portfolio, we've been working on several FP&A process models and their respective integrations with our customers' extensive environment.
Pros
- Simulation planning (FP&A, S&OP, etc)
- Compensation planning
- Constantly enhancing and evolving UI
- Intuitive and easy to understand platform
- Fast and early adoption among users
- CoE planning
- Process optimization
- API integrations
Cons
- The way LISS works and can interact with other components
- Can have more visualization (chart) options
- The way the engine reacts to syntax errors (sometimes can take several minutes depending on model size and complexity)
- Pages flexibility (in terms of possible and available functionalities as compared to old UX)
- Flexibility
- Ease of reporting
- Availability to even non-trained personnel
- UI/UX strength
- ROI > 200%
- Lowering multiple process' time for completion significantly (half, in other instances more)
Anaplan to me is far easier to understand, more intuitive to use, the interface is quite more appealing and the overall experience is more pleasant, so to say. With HFM I feel like using a tool that was created ~20 years ago, and no matter how easy it is to use in some aspects, or how well it performs with large data sets, I would prefer and recommend Anaplan.
Do you think Anaplan delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Anaplan's feature set?
Yes
Did Anaplan live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Anaplan go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Anaplan again?
Yes
Anaplan Feature Ratings
Using Anaplan
25 - Sales, Marketing, Accounting, Technical - almost all areas of our line of work meet their needs satisfied to a good extent in Anaplan. Depending on the business case, there can be an entire model, or just a section of it for the users to work with and it brings significant value to their day-to-day work.
9 - The beauty of Anaplan is that (even though our case is not exact) there are not many specific significant skills required to understand and even develop in Anaplan. Basic understanding of Excel-like structure and syntax is more than enough, as model building is made easy to understand and work with once you roll into the matter.
- Sales compensation
- AOP creation
- Statistical Forecast
- Demand Management
- FP&A
- UAT tracking and easing the process for end users to test and confirm new rollouts
- Project and capacity planning
- Holiday and sick leave planning (overall HR assistance)
- Project and capacity planning
Evaluating Anaplan and Competitors
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Product Reputation
- Prior Experience with the Product
The main reason is the ease of work with the tool, the implementation that requires a reasonable amount of technical understanding, but still can be done on a larger scale with non-technical personnel due to the learning path that the platform provides. The user experience has been tremendously improving in the past years and now the reporting is on par with some exceptional reporting platforms but at a less complex implementation curve.
I would focus on a more detailed analysis of the pros and cons of selecting the platform.
Anaplan Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Change management was a small part of the implementation and was well-handled - We made sure there's a clear ownership structure for maintaining our models post-implementation. We defined the roles and responsibilities for the ongoing model changes. Afterwards a regular training session process was established so our users can be savvy in Anaplan usage. We engaged key stakeholders early and continuously to align on the functionalities and outcomes. After the implementation a structured process to review, approve and implement model updates was put in place.
- Data quality (non-Anaplan related)
Anaplan Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved No escalation required Support cares about my success | None |
We did not, no specific reason to "why not", besides cost tracking.
One time i had an issue with a filtration of some items in a drop-down list on a UX page that was defaulting the scroll to the top every time i scroll down, and when i reported the issue, initially i was told that this is scheduled for a release as a bug; a day later i got reached out to by the support telling me the issue was fixed, and it was. Exceptional reaction and resolve time.
Using Anaplan
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- Forecasting
- Budget planning
- Cost tracking and planning
- Workforce planning
- Incentives and compensation planning
- Scenario planning
- Data warehousing and data storage
Yes, but I don't use it
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation