Anaplan - the planning solution you need
Overall Satisfaction with Anaplan
We use Anaplan as our core platform to design and implement connected planning solutions for enterprise clients. Most of the organizations we work with struggle with fragmented planning processes, reliance on spreadsheets or legacy systems, and slow decision cycles due to manual data consolidation.
Anaplan allows us to centralize data, automate workflows, and deliver real-time visibility across functions such as Commercial/Connected Business Planning (CBP) and FP&A. Our current scope includes multiple live CBP implementations across several business units, enabling faster scenario modeling, better alignment between teams, and more informed decision-making. We are also expanding into FP&A use cases, integrating Anaplan with complex enterprise system landscapes to create a fully connected planning ecosystem.
Anaplan allows us to centralize data, automate workflows, and deliver real-time visibility across functions such as Commercial/Connected Business Planning (CBP) and FP&A. Our current scope includes multiple live CBP implementations across several business units, enabling faster scenario modeling, better alignment between teams, and more informed decision-making. We are also expanding into FP&A use cases, integrating Anaplan with complex enterprise system landscapes to create a fully connected planning ecosystem.
Pros
- Simulation planning (FP&A, S&OP, etc)
- Compensation planning
- Constantly enhancing and evolving UI
- Intuitive and easy to understand platform
- Fast and early adoption among users
- CoE planning
- Process optimization
- API integrations
- Data Integration
- Forecasting
- Scenario planning & modeling
Cons
- The way LISS works and can interact with other components
- Can have more visualization (chart) options
- The way the engine reacts to syntax errors (sometimes can take several minutes depending on model size and complexity)
- Pages flexibility (in terms of possible and available functionalities as compared to old UX)
- View filters when creating imports
- Live syntax checks
- Optimize the way text suggestion interacts with formulas (small bugs)
- Flexibility
- Ease of reporting
- Availability to even non-trained personnel
- UI/UX strength
- Live dataflow and system updates
- ROI > 200%
- Lowering multiple process' time for completion significantly (half, in other instances more)
Anaplan and Pigment are both modern Connected Planning platforms, but they differ in maturity and depth. Pigment offers a very intuitive user experience with fast model setup, strong visual dashboards, and a modern interface that appeals to new planning teams or organizations prioritizing quick time-to-value. It’s well suited for smaller-to-mid-sized planning footprints or organizations that want to deploy standardized FP&A processes rapidly.
Anaplan, however, stands out in two key areas: enterprise scalability and depth of modeling. Its calculation engine handles complex, multi-dimensional models across regions, business units, and large datasets, making it ideal for enterprise use cases like incentive compensation, S&OP, and advanced scenario planning. In situations where planning requires sophisticated logic, cross-functional alignment, and multiple interconnected models, Anaplan consistently proves more robust and better suited for long-term strategic planning at scale.
Anaplan, however, stands out in two key areas: enterprise scalability and depth of modeling. Its calculation engine handles complex, multi-dimensional models across regions, business units, and large datasets, making it ideal for enterprise use cases like incentive compensation, S&OP, and advanced scenario planning. In situations where planning requires sophisticated logic, cross-functional alignment, and multiple interconnected models, Anaplan consistently proves more robust and better suited for long-term strategic planning at scale.
Do you think Anaplan delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Anaplan's feature set?
Yes
Did Anaplan live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Anaplan go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Anaplan again?
Yes
Anaplan Feature Ratings
Using Anaplan
25 - Sales, Marketing, Accounting, Technical - almost all areas of our line of work meet their needs satisfied to a good extent in Anaplan. Depending on the business case, there can be an entire model, or just a section of it for the users to work with and it brings significant value to their day-to-day work.
9 - The beauty of Anaplan is that (even though our case is not exact) there are not many specific significant skills required to understand and even develop in Anaplan. Basic understanding of Excel-like structure and syntax is more than enough, as model building is made easy to understand and work with once you roll into the matter.
- Sales compensation
- AOP creation
- Statistical Forecast
- Demand Management
- FP&A
- UAT tracking and easing the process for end users to test and confirm new rollouts
- Project and capacity planning
- Holiday and sick leave planning (overall HR assistance)
- Project and capacity planning
Evaluating Anaplan and Competitors
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Product Reputation
- Prior Experience with the Product
The main reason is the ease of work with the tool, the implementation that requires a reasonable amount of technical understanding, but still can be done on a larger scale with non-technical personnel due to the learning path that the platform provides. The user experience has been tremendously improving in the past years and now the reporting is on par with some exceptional reporting platforms but at a less complex implementation curve.
I would focus on a more detailed analysis of the pros and cons of selecting the platform.
Anaplan Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Change management was a small part of the implementation and was well-handled - One of the key lessons we learned is that successful change management starts with clearly defined ownership. We established a governance structure early—assigning roles for model ownership, decision-making, and ongoing enhancements—to ensure accountability after go-live. Engaging key stakeholders throughout the project helped align expectations, secure buy-in, and avoid last-minute surprises.
We also learned that continuous enablement drives adoption. We implemented recurring training sessions and hands-on workshops to build internal Anaplan capability, ensuring users felt confident maintaining and evolving the model instead of relying on external support. After go-live, we introduced a structured process for evaluating, approving, and implementing model changes, which helped keep enhancements controlled, transparent, and aligned with business priorities.
We also learned that continuous enablement drives adoption. We implemented recurring training sessions and hands-on workshops to build internal Anaplan capability, ensuring users felt confident maintaining and evolving the model instead of relying on external support. After go-live, we introduced a structured process for evaluating, approving, and implementing model changes, which helped keep enhancements controlled, transparent, and aligned with business priorities.
- Data quality (non-Anaplan related)
- User adoption
Anaplan Training
Anaplan Support
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved No escalation required Support cares about my success | None |
We did not, no specific reason to "why not", besides cost tracking.
One time i had an issue with a filtration of some items in a drop-down list on a UX page that was defaulting the scroll to the top every time i scroll down, and when i reported the issue, initially i was told that this is scheduled for a release as a bug; a day later i got reached out to by the support telling me the issue was fixed, and it was. Exceptional reaction and resolve time.
Using Anaplan
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- Forecasting
- Budget planning
- Cost tracking and planning
- Workforce planning
- Incentives and compensation planning
- Scenario planning
- Data warehousing and data storage
Yes, but I don't use it


Comments
Please log in to join the conversation