Atera vs. Panda Systems Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Atera
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Atera is a platform that enables IT professionals to gain access, visibility, and control over all their networks and devices from anywhere. Users can manage their IT operation from patch management, IT automations, advanced reporting, alerts, helpdesk, ticketing, and it features dozens of integrations with familiar tools. Its pay-per-technician model enables IT teams and MSPs to pay a fixed price and scale operations across unlimited devices, all while reducing menial tasks so they…
$99
per month per user
Panda Systems Management
Score 9.4 out of 10
N/A
Panda Security now offers system monitoring, client-less device management, patch management, and other capabilities via Panda Systems Management.N/A
Pricing
AteraPanda Systems Management
Editions & Modules
MSP - Pro
$129
per month per user
IT Department - Professional
$149
per month per user
MSP - Growth
$179
per month per user
IT Department - Expert
$189
per month per user
MSP - Power
$209
per month per user
IT Department - Master
$219
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AteraPanda Systems Management
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsUnlimited devices. Prices per user, per month, billed annually.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AteraPanda Systems Management
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
AteraPanda Systems Management
Application Performance Management
Comparison of Application Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Atera
10.0
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Panda Systems Management
9.0
1 Ratings
5% below category average
Virtualization monitoring10.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
IT Asset Discovery10.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Monitoring Tasks
Comparison of Monitoring Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Atera
9.4
87 Ratings
23% above category average
Panda Systems Management
9.1
3 Ratings
20% above category average
Remote monitoring9.386 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Network device monitoring8.774 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Activity Monitoring10.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Management Tasks
Comparison of Management Tasks features of Product A and Product B
Atera
9.1
86 Ratings
21% above category average
Panda Systems Management
9.4
3 Ratings
24% above category average
Patch Management8.785 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Policy-based automation8.873 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Remote Access
Comparison of Remote Access features of Product A and Product B
Atera
7.8
1 Ratings
11% below category average
Panda Systems Management
9.4
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Attended device access10.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Unattended device access10.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Mobile device access1.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Virtual device access10.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Multiple-display support7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Multiple concurrent sessions9.01 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AteraPanda Systems Management
Small Businesses
Panda Systems Management
Panda Systems Management
Score 9.4 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AteraPanda Systems Management
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(89 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.5
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.5
(36 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(5 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
AteraPanda Systems Management
Likelihood to Recommend
Atera
As a one-person IT department, Atera is almost like having another person to help, especially as we integrate the AIT functionalities. We have several locations spread over nearly 200 miles, and Atera has enabled me to remote in and fix something that before would have had to wait until we could justify an all-day or overnight 300 mile round trip.
Read full review
WatchGuard Technologies
Panda Systems Management is well suited for small to medium sized organizations looking for a tool to centralize asset management not only physical but also assist with rapid deployment of patches, applications, etc. It proves also to be very beneficial as permits (to and extent) to do troubleshooting without interfering or interrupting end users.
Read full review
Pros
Atera
  • Support, if you need them they are there and they always have the answers you need.
  • The AI scripting features allow you to really hit the ground running. You can give it a prompt and it will give you a script that will be very close to what you need. All you have to do is polish it up and test it out.
  • I love having the ability to use multiple remote access tools, in the event a machine has an issue with one of them, or if a cloud service goes down, you have a fallback.
  • The shared script library is an amazing resource for troubleshooting and streamlining.
  • The development teams are open to adding features and have done so frequently based on user requests.
Read full review
WatchGuard Technologies
  • Remote access. It's as good as any other on the market. It also allows for RDP connections which is a nice feature.
  • Inventory management. We get some great insight from the reports we can run.
  • Quick Jobs. If there's an app or service you use, there may be a quick job to install and update it remotely.
Read full review
Cons
Atera
  • Some basic functions need some extra work
  • Some basic things are behind paywalls
  • Feature board is not credible. Ideas taking very, very long to implement
  • Atera has no clear road map
  • SNMP monitoring needs a make over and needs more options
Read full review
WatchGuard Technologies
  • Licensing. With the possibility of monthly splitting
  • Integration with firewalls even outside the corporate network
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Atera
As of right now, we have found nothing that can offer as many features as Atera does along with the affordability. They are doing monthly releases each month and not just making small changes (shared scripting library, chocolatey support, Install packages, Splashtop SOS support, Scheduled tickets to name a few). The uptimes are great and accessibility to the dashboard has yet to be limited. We are a happy customer and bordering on fanboy status now
Read full review
WatchGuard Technologies
No answers on this topic
Usability
Atera
This has been a great platform to handle both service requests and device maintenance. Without it, we would have to do manual ticket creation through another platform that does not link with a RMM making the help desk inefficient and frustrating both Employees and the Executives of the company. The addition of AI makes all of this even easier!
Read full review
WatchGuard Technologies
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Atera
Atera support provides answers to my questions lightning fast. They have never left me feeling like I'm out there on my own. I can ask questions by email, or by chat, or by opening a ticket with them and they are always on it quickly. They also have a forum where other Atera users can help you if you need it, and you can also add feature requests via the forum.
Read full review
WatchGuard Technologies
We rate and recommend Panda Systems Management not only because it is a very effective and very cost effective solution that pays itself for us (ROI) extremely fast, but also due to all reason described previously and possibly a few more I'm sure we missed here. I do have to says tech support for this solution sometimes leave a bit to be desired.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Atera
Atera was the clear winner for us. The interface and tools were very easy to learn and setup. Atera's licensing incorporates good feature sets and value levels. Some of the other products were difficult to setup and lacked good flow between tools. The value proposition was also not as good.
Read full review
WatchGuard Technologies
Panda is a bit of a greatest hits between some of these other things. I feel like GoToAssist has a stronger remote support option, but Panda is more convenient. Kaseya has a ton of features, but from an ease of use standpoint, Panda seems stronger. Spiceworks has a fine inventory system but it lacks features. I added Azure as well since we are a 365 shop and Azure supplies a lot of the same visibility that Panda does. However it is a completely different animal, and it's way easier to hop into Panda and get what you need than get waaay more data than necessary from Azure/Azure AD/ATP.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Atera
  • We have been able to add new employees/devices without increasing my staff to support them.
  • The value of charging per technician verses per device cannot be stated enough. Without that pricing, I wouldn't be able to budget enough to pay for all of the things I get with Atera.
  • They have a customer portal which allows the end user to check on submitted tickets, open new tickets and recommend any new features.
Read full review
WatchGuard Technologies
  • It has facilitated us in the management of controls on the various clients, reducing the cost of human resources
  • Thanks to the alerts, in case of intrusion, it is possible to intervene promptly
Read full review
ScreenShots

Atera Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of