AtomicWriter vs. Webflow

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AtomicWriter
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
AtomicWriter helps users create original content optimized to maximize visibility for content marketing campaigns.N/A
Webflow
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Webflow headquartered in San Francisco offers what they describe as a visual solution to web design, with a CMS for editors, designers, and developers that they state allows users to create needed content structures, add content (by hand, from a CSV, or via our API), and then design it visually. Webflow service plans also include website hosting, with a basic plan for sites that don't need a CMS as well as CMS, Business, and Enterprise plans. Webflow's ecommerce plans are designed to support new…
$12
per month
Pricing
AtomicWriterWebflow
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Basic
$12.00
per month
CMS
$16.00
per month
Business
$36.00
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AtomicWriterWebflow
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AtomicWriterWebflow
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
AtomicWriterWebflow
Content Creation
Comparison of Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
AtomicWriter
10.0
1 Ratings
21% above category average
Webflow
-
Ratings
Ideation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Approval workflows10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content collaboration10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content calendar10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Network for content licensing/production10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Publishing
Comparison of Content Publishing features of Product A and Product B
AtomicWriter
9.4
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Webflow
-
Ratings
Content hub10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Forms / Gated content10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Embedded CTAs10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content distribution9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content automation8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
AtomicWriter
8.2
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Webflow
-
Ratings
Audience profiling and targeting7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Closed-loop tracking and reporting9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content performance analytics8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Campaign optimization dashboard9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Competitive analytics8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AtomicWriterWebflow
Small Businesses
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Pantheon
Pantheon
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Pantheon
Pantheon
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AtomicWriterWebflow
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
2.2
(9 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(3 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.5
(3 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
AtomicWriterWebflow
Likelihood to Recommend
Atomic Reach
AtomicWriter is especially suitable for blog writing and for this type of work. It also gives different formats and restructures it with a great view. I think that's it.
Read full review
Webflow
Webflow is great for designing pages and creating a really nice looking website, without needing to be a pro designer. However, trying to scale a company blog for SEO leaves a lot of room for desire. There are various SEO-related shortcomings (like how canonical tags are added to pages) and I also need to add a lot of custom code elements to blog posts to get the desired control. This means adding new posts and getting them looking the way we want takes way more time than it should do. Also doesn't support next-gen images, which is impacting our page speed scores and leaving us behind when it comes to Core Web Vitals update. Finally, the fact that only one person can enter the designer at one time is really annoying. I get that the Editor should be the solution to this, but it's so so so slow and jumpy that this is essentially unusable.
Read full review
Pros
Atomic Reach
  • Makes my writing awesome.
  • Restructures it.
  • Gives me different writing formats.
Read full review
Webflow
  • Easy to use and customize CMS.
  • Develop engaging CSS interactions and JavaScript animations visually.
  • Several competitively priced hosting tiers are available and all use AWS servers and Fastly CDN.
  • Code can be exported to be used with other CMS platforms such as WordPress, or E-Commerce platforms such as Shopify.
Read full review
Cons
Atomic Reach
  • Nothing too bad.
  • Needs more features.
  • Should be less expensive.
Read full review
Webflow
  • pricing is a little high
  • pretty steep learning curve
  • have to use 3rd party form vendor if you want to export and host yourself
Read full review
Usability
Atomic Reach
No answers on this topic
Webflow
It is extremely easy to use, especially with available templates and guides. It is used primarily by accounts and creative rather than dev. It is also easy to import/export projects or duplicate them for re-use and modification for another client. While it is rarely the end platform for a deliverable, it is often instrumental in pitching.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Atomic Reach
No answers on this topic
Webflow
In my experience, their customer service is an absolute joke, I tried reaching out to them they took forever. I had to keep following up with them as if they never received it in the first place. It’s a new platform, so guidance is needed. Tried the university they offer, in my opinion, it is completely useless, I would just completely move on from this website.
Read full review
Performance
Atomic Reach
No answers on this topic
Webflow
In my opinion, it is horrible, the rendering takes forever. I have the newest MacBook and the platform will still lag and slow down on me. I’m not a developer, I am a designer which makes it worst because I am using the features they are providing not extra coding features. In my opinion, it is a horrible platform really, stay away.
Read full review
Support Rating
Atomic Reach
No answers on this topic
Webflow
We pay hundreds of dollars a month to Webflow, yet their support is worse than a typical free SaaS product. We were prevented from deploying changes to our site because of how Webflow structures its support. It delayed a product launch for the whole company. Support options? Beg for help on community forums, it took a threat to email the CEO to finally get movement. If there were easy alternatives, we would switch. But for now we just pray nothing breaks and that we don't need to interact with Webflow support.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Atomic Reach
No answers on this topic
Webflow
The code quality and speed can't even be compared to Elementor; Webflow is simply a much better tool. Instapage has a cool feature for dynamic landing pages, which changes according to Google Ads Keyword, which I miss; however, amazing webflow community members recreated that functionality with a custom script. For the majority of users, it's a safer bet than WordPress in terms of speed and code quality. WordPress could provide amazing results if hosted properly (nginx, caching configuration) and requires best practices to maintain code quality. Webflow solves these issues out of the box at a fraction of cost.
Read full review
Scalability
Atomic Reach
No answers on this topic
Webflow
I feel it doesn’t perform the way it’s supposed to and it doesn’t have any beneficial factors to it. In my opinion, there is no reason to use a platform like this when Wix and Shopify, and WordPress exist. I believe Webflow is a platform that shouldn’t exist and it’s only popular because of the hype it received. I tried it and hate it completely.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Atomic Reach
  • Nothing at all
  • -
  • -
Read full review
Webflow
  • It allowed us to go from earning hundreds to thousands
  • We were able to expand our services
  • The only negative would be that we cannot really use it as a Shopify substitute yet, nor a big blog site.
Read full review
ScreenShots