Automox vs. Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Automox
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Automox is an endpoint management solution from the company of the same name in Boulder. Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single console. With it, IT and SecOps can gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure. Automox aims to reduce corporate risk while raising operational…
$2
per month per endpoint
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator (formerly McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator) software centralizes and streamlines management of endpoint, network, data security, and compliance solutions.N/A
Pricing
AutomoxTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AutomoxTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsFrom $2/mo per endpoint at volume
More Pricing Information
Features
AutomoxTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Product A and Product B
Automox
-
Ratings
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
6.6
1 Ratings
19% below category average
Network Analytics00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Threat Recognition00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Threat Analysis00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Vulnerability Management Tools
Comparison of Vulnerability Management Tools features of Product A and Product B
Automox
-
Ratings
Trellix ePolicy Orchestrator
6.0
1 Ratings
31% below category average
IT Asset Realization00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Authentication00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Configuration Monitoring00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Web Scanning00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Vulnerability Intelligence00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AutomoxTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Small Businesses
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
KACE Systems Management Appliance
KACE Systems Management Appliance
Score 10.0 out of 10
CrowdStrike Falcon
CrowdStrike Falcon
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AutomoxTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(61 ratings)
7.0
(14 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
1.9
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(25 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
5.5
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
1.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
3.5
(2 ratings)
8.2
(4 ratings)
Product Scalability
6.4
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AutomoxTrellix ePolicy Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend
Automox
It is perfectly suited for organizations with a small IT staff and large amount of devices. It's also perfect for pushing software to machines that are not on the network or VPN. It's less effective for server patch management. I like to have a little more control of my server patching
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
[McAfee ePolicy Orchestrator] seems to be better suited to large enterprise applications... I don't feel it really suits the or self-managed SMB market. The general joe is not going to understand how to wield this product to it's full potential. For those of us managing large networks, this is a very ideal product for managing multiple sites and users.
Read full review
Pros
Automox
  • Excellent support for Windows-based systems. Rarely have any issues updating those systems.
  • When issues do arise, the Automox support team has been very responsive and informative of solutions (or where projects are on potential roll out dates).
  • The user interface is intuitive and easy to use.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Static malware scans for known bad processes and files works well and can be schedules on endpoints easily
  • Preventing users from accessing USB drives and other peripherals is easily configured. We can also allow users to access to USB drives with user codes for the times they need it for business reasons.
  • ePO provides access into our MSME software so that we're not managing many different products from different locations.
  • In recent years the console has gotten much easier to navigate even though there is a ton of information to be accessed.
Read full review
Cons
Automox
  • initial deployment of agents to all end points was a challenge, would have been great if there was a way for Automox to discover and install.
  • Sometimes upgrading the Automox client which becomes old due to an end point not connecting for a long time becomes challenging as it becomes incompatible and has to be upgraded manually
  • It would good to have a functionality where an end point device can be turned into a brick if desired in cases where the device is not returned back after an employee is terminated. This should also have the option of turning it back into an active device if we choose to
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • It has a slow mechanism when adding custom threat feeds. For example, if McAfee didn't have a signature or detection about a new virus and we try to add it to our console it is like a really big process in adding that to our available signatures.
  • Whenever a scan is performed, the system CPU utilization goes up 100 percent.
  • Installation fails due to difference in timestamp when we try to shuffle between packages.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Automox
The system is really simple. We pushed the installer out through Group policy. Devices connected can get further defined by Tags or Groups.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Usability
Automox
After using a combination of WSUS and group policy to manage patching on a large number of devices, it was excellent to move to a single-pane experience where patch policies, restart schedules, reports, and device status can be seen easily and quickly. Its pre-patch report on policies is particularly handy so you can check if devices will take the appropriate action before it's run.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Automox
In my experience, they were responsive but the fixes were more like bandaids than a fix for the underlying problems which they admitted were on their end.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
McAfee support is definitely GREAT! It is one of the best technical support on a business level. GOLD support is recommended to business. Their website is easy and quick to create a ticket. Their technical team usually responds right away with an email or call. Via call and web they provide a full and complete support until the issue is resolved. The best, most of the time they explain in detail what is the issue, the reason and how to resolve it.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Automox
We stoppped using PDQ because it required our users to connect to the corporate VPN. It might take months for some remote users to receive a patch, and often we would have to schedule time with them one-on-one to ensure that it got done. With Automox, we don't have to do any of that - it just happens silently in the background.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
I have used Symantec Endpoint Encryption before. Symantec and EPO are both good in their own ways. EPO allows integration of other McAfee products. I have been using ePolicy Orchestrator for years. I have a lot of experience with the product. That is why I like it.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Automox
  • Automox allows us to fix vulnerabilities in the shortest amount of time ever.
  • The automated patching and end point management features have made our jobs much easier.
  • We get to focus on more important tasks and not have to manually patch the operating systems.
Read full review
Trellix (FireEye + McAfee)
  • Peace of mind that your environment is safe and secure.
  • Keep your network environment up and running.
  • Additional resources (consulting or training) may be required if not familiar with the product.
  • Very complex to setup and configure ( training may be required).
  • Once configured, it will take care of almost 80% of your tasks.
Read full review
ScreenShots