Automox Modern Patch Management for the Cloud Era
Updated June 12, 2025

Automox Modern Patch Management for the Cloud Era

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Automox

Automox is a versatile endpoint management solution that we use extensively in our organization to address several critical business needs. Vulnerability Management Compliance Operational Efficiency

Pros

  • Endpoint Patching
  • Security Configurations
  • Custom Scripting
  • Operational Efficiency
  • Remote Management

Cons

  • Need some improvements while taking system on remote
  • Need some more worklet templates for deploying patches
  • Worklets for deploying exe patches
  • Reduced Operational Costs
  • Automation
  • Time Savings
  • Efficiency
  • Rapid Deployment
  • Increased Efficiency
  • Visibility and Control
  • Proactive Management
  • Reduction of On-Premise Infrastructure
  • Cloud-Native Solution
  • Cost Savings
  • Time Efficiency
  • Enhanced Security
Improved Security Increased Efficiency Better Compliance Enhanced Visibility Reduced Downtime
Its best in the market.

Do you think Automox delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Automox's feature set?

Yes

Did Automox live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Automox go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Automox again?

Yes

We have large no of systems and we can not patch those systems manually. Automox is playing a vital role in this.

Using Automox

250 - Invia is an Australia-based IT SaaS solutions provider with 17+ years of experience working with telecom operators globally. We specialize in solving the most complex challenges for telecom operators in the B2B and B2B2X segments across the entire lifecycle journey of enterprise customers. At Invia, we don’t just create solutions that meet expectations - we redefine customer experience and offer solutions to problems that others could not solve.
2 - We have a skilled SOC team in place that manages all Automox-related support activities.
  • Patch Management
  • Software Deployment and Removal
  • Configuration Management via Worklets
  • Compliance Reporting
  • Endpoint Visibility and Control
  • Custom Security Hardening via Worklets
  • Automating User Cleanup and Access Revocation
  • Enforcing Application Whitelisting
  • Incident Response Automation
  • Onboarding New Devices Securely
  • Automated Vulnerability Remediation
  • Scheduled Security Policy Enforcement
  • Integration with SIEM or SOAR
  • Endpoint Hygiene Monitoring
  • Support for Remote or Hybrid Workforces
  • Policy-Based Geo/Time Enforcement
Automox has an intuitive interface that makes it easy to deploy patches, manage software, and enforce policies without deep technical overhead.
It supports Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it a one-stop solution for heterogeneous environments. Worklets provide flexible, script-based automation that extends beyond patching—ideal for enforcing security configurations, cleanup tasks, or compliance controls. We can see patch status, compliance posture, and device health in real time, which is critical for SOC operations and audit readiness.
Automox doesn't rely on traditional WSUS or SCCM infrastructure, enabling faster patch deployment and better performance, especially for remote and airgap-managed assets. Designed with modern cybersecurity needs in mind—it aligns with zero-trust principles, supports 2FA, and helps us meet standards like CIS and NIST.

Evaluating Automox and Competitors

  • Cloud Solutions
  • Scalability
  • Integration with Other Systems
  • Ease of Use
The most critical factor in our decision to adopt Automox was its ability to automate security patching and configuration management across a diverse set of endpoints, all while maintaining compliance with internal and external security standards (such as CIS, NIST, and ISO).
In a security-focused environment—especially one involving air-gapped facilities—manual patching and enforcement of configuration baselines is not only time-consuming but also prone to human error. Automox solves this by offering:


Automated Patch Management that closes vulnerabilities quickly and consistently.


Custom Worklets that allow us to enforce security baselines and remediate drift using scripts.


Centralized Visibility so the SOC team has real-time insight into endpoint health and compliance.


Audit-Readiness with reporting tools that help demonstrate security posture during reviews.


By reducing manual effort and increasing automation, Automox directly supports our operational efficiency, regulatory compliance, and risk reduction goals.
1. Involve Cross-Functional Stakeholders - We would engage teams from security, IT operations, compliance, and even end-user support earlier in the evaluation. Their feedback would help ensure the solution aligns with broader organizational needs and not just patching.
2. Conduct a Broader Proof of Concept (PoC) - While our initial PoC was successful, we would expand it to include:

A wider range of OS types (Windows, Linux, macOS)


Remote and air-gapped endpoints


Real-world patching and worklet scenarios
This would give us deeper insight into Automox’s behavior in diverse environments.
3. Benchmark Against Multiple Tools Using a Weighted Scoring Matrix - We would implement a more formalized evaluation matrix with clearly defined criteria like:

Ease of use


Integration capability (SIEM, EDR, SOAR, etc.)


Scalability


Support and documentation


Total cost of ownership
This structured comparison would help validate why Automox stands out versus alternatives.
4. Assess Long-Term Automation Capabilities - In hindsight, we’d emphasize evaluating the flexibility and scalability of Worklets and their role in broader automation strategies, as this has become a major benefit post-implementation.
5. Validate Compliance & Reporting Fit - We would run mock compliance scenarios (e.g., CIS checks, audit reporting) during evaluation to ensure the reporting capabilities align with our internal audit and regulatory needs.

Automox Implementation

Implementing Automox successfully starts with a clear strategy for organizing and grouping devices based on operating systems, environments, or business criticality. This ensures that patching and configuration policies can be applied with precision. A phased rollout approach is essential—beginning with a pilot group allows teams to test patching schedules, reboot behaviors, and custom Worklets before scaling across the organization. Leveraging Worklets from the start can significantly boost automation by enforcing security baselines and performing routine system tasks. Integration with existing SOC tools, such as SIEMs, enhances visibility and response time by correlating patch compliance with threat intelligence. Additionally, aligning patching schedules with operational downtimes minimizes disruptions, and consistent monitoring and reporting helps maintain compliance and prepare for audits. Overall, Automox offers a streamlined and effective solution, but its true value is unlocked through thoughtful planning, testing, and integration with existing IT and security workflows.
Change management was a small part of the implementation and was well-handled - One of the key lessons we learned from implementing Automox is the importance of proactive and transparent communication across teams. Even though Automox simplifies patching and endpoint management, introducing automation into any security process can raise concerns, especially around reboot schedules, software enforcement, and endpoint visibility. We found that involving stakeholders early—particularly IT operations, security, and end-user support—helped align expectations and build trust. Providing clear documentation, setting defined maintenance windows, and gradually rolling out policies allowed us to minimize resistance and avoid disruptions. Additionally, establishing feedback loops after each rollout phase gave us valuable insight for fine-tuning our approach. Ultimately, successful change management required not just a technical rollout but a cultural shift toward greater automation, security, and accountability.
  • Worklet Testing Across OS Variants
  • Handling Legacy or Air-Gapped Systems
  • Limited Native Reporting Flexibility

Automox Support

1. Simplicity and Ease of Use
2. Cross-Platform Support
3. Powerful Automation with Worklets
4. Real-Time Visibility and Control
5. Fast and Reliable Cloud-Based Updates
6. Strong Security Focus
ProsCons
Quick Resolution
Good followup
Knowledgeable team
Problems get solved
Kept well informed
No escalation required
Immediate help available
None
We did not purchase premium support initially, as we wanted to assess the platform’s core capabilities and see if standard support would meet our needs. So far, the documentation and community resources have been sufficient for day-to-day operations. However, we’re keeping premium support in consideration as our use of Automox grows and becomes more central to our security operations.
Yes — there was a time when we encountered a critical issue where scheduled patch deployments were failing silently on a specific group of Linux endpoints. This posed a serious compliance risk, especially in our air-gapped environment where visibility and timing are crucial.
We reached out to Automox support, and the response was exceptional:


Rapid Acknowledgement: The support team acknowledged the ticket within minutes and immediately escalated it due to its potential impact.


Collaborative Troubleshooting: They worked closely with our SOC and infrastructure teams in real-time, guiding us through advanced diagnostics and custom log analysis.


Worklet Assistance: They even helped us create and test a custom Worklet on short notice to apply a workaround until the core issue was resolved in a patch.


Follow-Up & Documentation: After resolution, they provided detailed documentation and follow-up to ensure the issue wouldn’t recur—and offered best practices for ongoing monitoring.

Using Automox

ProsCons
Like to use
Relatively simple
Easy to use
Technical support not required
Well integrated
Consistent
Quick to learn
Convenient
Feel confident using
Familiar
None
  • Cross-Platform Patch Management
  • Creating and Deploying Worklets
  • Real-Time Device Visibility
  • Group Management and Policy Targeting
  • Software Deployment
  • Limited Native Reporting & Customization
  • Managing Complex Dependencies or Reboots
  • Worklet Debugging & Testing at Scale
  • Lack of Native Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) Granularity
  • Integration Complexity Without SOAR or Middleware

Comments

More Reviews of Automox