Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AWS WAF
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Web Services offers AWS WAF (web application firewall) to protect web applications from malicious behavior that might impede the applications functioning and performance, with customizable rules to prevent known harmful behaviors and an API for creating and deploying web security rules.
$0.60
per 1 million requests
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Cloudflare’s connectivity cloud is a unified platform of cloud-native services designed to help enterprises regain control over their IT environments. Powered by an intelligent, programmable global cloud network, it is built to offer security, performance, visibility, and reliability.
$20
per month
FortiWeb
Score 6.3 out of 10
N/A
FortiWeb is Fortinet's web application security system (or web application firewall, WAF) featuring advanced vulnerability management and threat detection and prevention, available in deployment as an appliance or virtual appliance, also as a hosted or a cloud-based virtual solution.N/A
Pricing
AWS WAFCloudflareFortiWeb
Editions & Modules
Resource Type - Request
$0.60
per 1 million requests
Resource Type - Rule
$1.00
per month (prorated hourly)
Resource Type - Web ACL
$5.00
per month (prorated hourly)
Pro
$20
per month
Business
$200
per month
Free
Free
Enterprise
Contact sales team
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AWS WAFCloudflareFortiWeb
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AWS WAFCloudflareFortiWeb
Considered Multiple Products
AWS WAF
Chose AWS WAF
When it comes to integration with AWS resources, we found that AWS WAF can easily integrate with CloudFront, API gateway, ALB, etc. When we analyzed other products, we found that the integration can be a little more difficult than just a click of a button. However, the pricing …
Chose AWS WAF
Easy of use. Setup and configuration is fairly quick. There are the usual advantages of it being a cloud solution where you can buy into the solution, configure it and set it up and get it up and running. If you are already a subscriber to AWS, having a native service has …
Chose AWS WAF
Comparatively, AWS WAF is far more prevalent in modern age web application as most of the High-Traffic E-commerce sites are moved on AWS. Due to this most developers are familiar with WAF, in addition its pretty easy comparatively as well. So other solutions may only come into …
Chose AWS WAF
There are a number of reasons to select AWS WAF. Most importantly, it easy to deploy. It helps programmers to protect against a wide range of vulnerabilities like injection attacks, DDoS, and many others from OWASP top 10. It allows us to set up rules and blocks any threats …
Chose AWS WAF
The integration with AWS services is pretty straight forward and provides a lot of functionalities other products don't. AWS Managed Rules can be used for easy setup with high protection options or Custom Rules can be created to costomize WAF to fit our needs.
Chose AWS WAF
Unlike these other AWS tools, WAF provides real-time traffic control, rules that can be customized according to the needs of the user, and is based on an implementation in the cloud which avoids the use of memory on computers as well as an account with a very affordable cost …
Chose AWS WAF
The use of this software was decided on because it is much easier to manage since the rules that are implemented can be specific or centralized. We also like it because you only pay for what you used.

Imperva SecureSphere requires a much higher learning curve.
Chose AWS WAF
We evaluated Imperva, but we were more convinced with AWS WAF because of the better pricing model, ease of deployment as we were already using the AWS platform which helping in ease of integration. The technical support for AWS WAF seemed to be better as they had better …
Cloudflare
Chose Cloudflare
All the products are exceptional but only Cloudflare allows access to smaller businesses
Chose Cloudflare
Cloudflare is no doubt more enterprise focused compared to others solutions that I have used in the past.
Chose Cloudflare
I use Bunny concurrently with Cloudflare. Both services are unique to each other while offering similar services.
What Cloudflare has over Bunny is their numerous PoPs spread all over the world. Bunny still doesn't have a configurable WAF offering for the general public as of …
Chose Cloudflare
They are leaps and bounds better for a myriad or reasons. Setting up is much easier, it works faster, and it has less problems all around.
Chose Cloudflare
Cloudflare is less expensive with better performance. What more coudl you ask for?

Digitalocean has been great but when comparing costs to features, Cloudflare is cheaper for object storage and better performing across their large network.
Chose Cloudflare
Nothing like it. Organizations can utilize these Cloudflare products to enhance their online presence by improving security, performance, reliability, and developer efficiency. Cloudflare is an American company that delivers services such as DNS, a content delivery network …
Chose Cloudflare
A few years ago, GoDaddy started charging us to be their DNS provider, and Cloudflare didn't charge, so we moved to Cloudflare. Also, Cloudflare was known for security protection, for example DDOS protection, and we haven't had any issues since moving to Cloudflare.
Chose Cloudflare
Cloudflare is on another level compared to any other CDN provider out there.
One of the reasons is that encompasses all the tools into one big products instead of relying on many different products from many companies - DNS, CDN, WAF are all managed in one place and connected …
Chose Cloudflare
Cloudflare was better, because we do not have to host or purchase any additional hardware. This means reduced costs for us to have to buy the hardware. Then, hire people to run the hardwar, and support the hardware. And, it also means you need SME's for the tool that have used …
Chose Cloudflare
Cloudflare's cloud/geo-relative implementation is best-suited for publicly available web resources.
Chose Cloudflare
Cloudflare's product offering is more mature and has demonstrated success in preventing some of the largest DDoS attacks observed. Cloudflare also continues to reinvest in their core product offering to ensure they maintain a position as leader in the cybersecurity space.
Chose Cloudflare
Cloudflare knows what they're doing when Load Balancing and Redundancy meet the cloud. AWS is a partner, and we're exploring other solutions which are performing at the highest level.

Peak season is upon us, and we cannot suffer downtime. DDoS Protection is another interesting …
Chose Cloudflare
Cloudflare has much better interface and is easier to use on a daily basis
Chose Cloudflare
Amazon CloudFront is a highly scalable CDN service integrated with AWS. Couldflare provides us more other functions and services than Amazon CloudFront. Google Cloud CDN offers fast and reliable content delivery with integration into Google Cloud services. But we didn't deploy …
Chose Cloudflare
Cloudflare is definitely a leader in the CDN space and is fending off well in the security area for web applications even when faced against vendors like Akamai which are more widespread and better known
If Cloudflare keeps competitive prices and updated technology stack i …
Chose Cloudflare
Cloudflare is complex to set up but is still better suited to our environment.
Chose Cloudflare
Cloudflare addresses Pipefy a well-defined cache system with several features to improve the performance of the applications. This is the main focus + excellent reliability and stability.
Chose Cloudflare
Overall we are using Cloudflare as well as AWS cloud across various domains in our organization. To some extent such as DNS management on Route53, CloudFront takes advantage of Cloudflare as it provides a straightforward UI for DNS management. But when it comes to traffic …
Chose Cloudflare
20% of the entire world traffic run through Cloudflare data centers
Chose Cloudflare
Cloudflare can't compare to the reliability and ease of setup configuration.
Chose Cloudflare
Cloudflare is much easier to configure compared to these services.
FortiWeb
Chose FortiWeb
Most of them have the same features but not for FREE. The second point was the total cost of ownership for 3 and 5 years. Fortinet supported us with the best prices for 3 years and 5 years as well with advanced hardware replacement against the others.
Features
AWS WAFCloudflareFortiWeb
DDoS Protection
Comparison of DDoS Protection features of Product A and Product B
AWS WAF
-
Ratings
Cloudflare
10.0
Ratings
0% above category average
FortiWeb
-
Ratings
Automatic Scalability00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Mitigation SLA00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Security policy management00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
WAF capabilities00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Request rate limiting00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Traffic filtering00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Bot detection00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Global threat intelligence00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Real-time analytics and reporting00 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AWS WAFCloudflareFortiWeb
Small Businesses
Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Cloudflare
Cloudflare
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
Score 9.4 out of 10
IBM Cloud Internet Services
IBM Cloud Internet Services
Score 9.8 out of 10
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
Score 9.4 out of 10
Enterprises
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
Score 9.4 out of 10
Akamai App & API Protector
Akamai App & API Protector
Score 8.5 out of 10
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
F5 Big-IP Advanced WAF
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AWS WAFCloudflareFortiWeb
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(0 ratings)
7.7
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AWS WAFCloudflareFortiWeb
Likelihood to Recommend
AWS WAF is highly appropriate to interrupt or prevent cyber attacks because when implementing rules, whether they are specific or centralized, so any application that has these vulnerabilities is protected.
Implementing managed rules creates greater security to protect both API and applications. If implemented along with other AWS tools, the security is much better, so if you want to protect applications against more specific attacks, it is ideal to integrate with Amazon CloudFront, which is a great benefit because it warns when thresholds are exceeded or specific attacks occur. AWS WAF is ideal to avoid common web attacks. For more specific attacks and scenarios, I don't recommend this.
Read full review
Cloudflare works well as security measure that gives peace of mind without needing to work too hard to get it functioning well. It provides great tools to customize the security experience as well. This is all the same for the caching tools as well. They have a lot of built in tools that make using the caching easy right out of the box, but they provide the customization options to get things just right for your site.
Read full review
Regarding my experience, I prefer to deploy FortiWeb in a reverse proxy to have the full features and protection. The other mode will be useful for special cases as will it will not have the full range of features and protection. Like offline Sniffing, it will be used in special cases.
Read full review
Pros
  • AWS WAF has the most developer-friendly API to create firewall rules.
  • AWS WAF provides OWASP security controls, which reduces developers' burden (i.e., SQL injection and cross-site scripting).
  • AWS WAF has customizable web security rules. The user can even push the rules through the API available, which is the great feature and helped me a lot.
  • It protects applications at layer 7 (HTTP) of the OSI model and not just layer 4 (TCP).
Read full review
  • Registrar and DNS services are impeccable, with registrations done at cost and without ADs. DNS services setting standards for speed of resolution.
  • DDOS protection. With their content distribution network to back them they have the bandwidth and tools to be both proactive and reactive to bad actors.
  • WAF - Their Web Application Firewall helps mitigate common site vulnerabilities and has active zero-day protection running for breaking exploits
Read full review
  • API protection
  • Bot mitigation
  • Web application protection
  • Application delivery
Read full review
Cons
  • The documentation offered is somewhat confusing, so it would be ideal if it were much more direct and precise.
  • Your initial configuration may be confusing, so the best option is to use the rule templates provided by AWS.
  • Its configuration is not unified with AWS, so it must be done separately and it takes some time.
  • The number of rules to be established is somewhat limited.
Read full review
  • In some cases, using Cloudflare can actually lead to slower website speeds if the network is congested or if the website's traffic is particularly heavy.
  • Some website owners may find that the level of customization offered by Cloudflare is limited, especially in comparison to other solutions.
  • While Cloudflare is easy to set up and manage, it may be too complex for users who are not familiar with web technologies.
Read full review
  • Built-in vulnerability scanner should be better in next release
  • Predefined security policies for other web application not listed
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
We have been using AWS WAF for the past 3 years in front of our websites. We find it useful in preventing data crawling, DDOS attacks, etc on our websites, and hence we are going to use it in the future as well. AWS WAF is one of the best Firewalls in business.
Read full review
CF is a core piece of our cloud infra.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
The product is highly scalable. It is easy to configure the rules and thereby helps us to mitigate many vulnerabilities. The interface and programming of the firewall provisions were easy to setup. Amazon clearly spent a lot of time figuring this out and perfecting it. It allows users to do customized configurations based on their needs. It provides protection against a number of security issues like XSS, SQL injection, etc. I would definitely recommend this for protecting your infra as you scale, since this basically protects and filters all requests hitting your application server.
Read full review
Everything is extremely concise and all settings apply immediately and take effect globally. There is no reason to explicitly plan/think in terms of individual regions as one would have to traditional cloud offerings (AWS, OCI, Azure). All Cloudflare products integrate seamless as part of a single pipeline that executes from request to response.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
No answers on this topic
In 6+ years of relying on Cloudflare, I think we experienced one or two brief outages that were Cloudflare's fault.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
No answers on this topic
They are built to be fast and deliver very well on this. Performance has never been a problem.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
If you're intending to use AWS WAF, I would say that you absolutely should sign up for support. AWS Support is excellent and they can help you in a really good way to solve your issues.
Read full review
I have only used their support a few times, and most times, they are responsive and able to resolve my issue with a minimal amount of time and effort. However, there was one instance where I simply asked about how to purchase some more resources (redirect rules), and I received some type of automated/AI response that was very unhelpful and gave me no opportunity to escalate to a person.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
No answers on this topic
Very well executed implementation where our team was able to handle the implementation with guidance.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Easy of use. Setup and configuration is fairly quick. There are the usual advantages of it being a cloud solution where you can buy into the solution, configure it and set it up and get it up and running. If you are already a subscriber to AWS, having a native service has its advantages.
Read full review
Nothing like it. Organizations can utilize these Cloudflare products to enhance their online presence by improving security, performance, reliability, and developer efficiency. Cloudflare is an American company that delivers services such as DNS, a content delivery network (CDN), and various other additional services to make websites faster and more secure. Cloudflare is used by over 26 million sites, resulting in the processing of more than 1 billion IP addresses each day.
Read full review
Most of them have the same features but not for FREE. The second point was the total cost of ownership for 3 and 5 years. Fortinet supported us with the best prices for 3 years and 5 years as well with advanced hardware replacement against the others.
Read full review
Scalability
No answers on this topic
They are built for scale and have the capacity to handle all the traffic we could ever expect to get.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Somewhat costly if specific needs are not there.
  • If security is concerned than comparatively is beneficial.
  • All those price that spent on AWS WAF in return gets saved in man hours.
Read full review
  • We have seen reduced usage and downtimes after using Cloudflare for Caching. This has already yielded ROI as minimal downtime ensures consistent user traffic and increases revenue.
  • It can handle significant traffic spikes and shields the website from DDOS attacks. We have prevented a number of DDOS attacks after using Cloudflare and hence we are already seeing an ROI by using it.
  • Some of the integrations with Cloudflare are really painful and we have faced a lot of issues because of not having native integrations to certain 3rd party apps.
Read full review
  • ROI for last three years was 60%
Read full review
ScreenShots