AWS WAF, a really good alternative
Overall Satisfaction with AWS WAF
We use AWS WAF in our whole organization to help us protect all workloads we deploy using AWS CloudFront and AWS API Gateway. The mail problems we cover are layer seven attacks, but we also create whitelists and blacklists to allow or deny specific traffic. We also use Managed Rules for AWS WAF, to quickly get started and protect our web application or APIs against common threats.
Pros
- Great integration with AWS services.
- Easy configuration management via API.
Cons
- Reporting.
- Log visualization.
- Pricing can be less than other WAF solutions.
- Configuration is easy so it's not time consuming.
- Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF), Qualys Web Application Firewall (WAF) and F5 Advanced Web Application Firewall
The integration with AWS services is pretty straight forward and provides a lot of functionalities other products don't. AWS Managed Rules can be used for easy setup with high protection options or Custom Rules can be created to costomize WAF to fit our needs.
Do you think AWS WAF delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with AWS WAF's feature set?
Yes
Did AWS WAF live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of AWS WAF go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy AWS WAF again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation