Barracuda Email Protection vs. Cisco Cloud Email Security vs. Informatica Data Archive (legacy)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Barracuda Email Protection
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Barracuda Email Protection is an email security solution that uses machine learning to provide protection against threats. It combines email gateway defenses and API-based inbox defense to prevent attacks, respond to threats in real time, and secure Microsoft 365 data.N/A
Cisco Cloud Email Security
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Cisco's Cloud Email Security platform is a secure email gateway.N/A
Informatica Data Archive (legacy)
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Informatica Data Archive is used to control data growth in production databases and retire legacy applications. It is a legacy product and will not receive further updates.N/A
Pricing
Barracuda Email ProtectionCisco Cloud Email SecurityInformatica Data Archive (legacy)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Barracuda Email ProtectionCisco Cloud Email SecurityInformatica Data Archive (legacy)
Free Trial
YesNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Barracuda Email ProtectionCisco Cloud Email SecurityInformatica Data Archive (legacy)
Considered Multiple Products
Barracuda Email Protection
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
We have used several email solutions over the years, some were bought and killed off by larger companies. Barracuda Email Protection offers a very complete solution and has all the tools that we were looking for, and our MSP offered it.
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
We used Zix before migrating to M365 with a different mail server company. It was okay, but didn't offer all of the features Barracuda did at basically the same price point.
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
Barracuda Essentials has a far easier admin pannel than is provided by mimecast along with far more filtering options such as dkim. Much easier to do the initial setup along with much better support provided. Barracuda Essentials has Advanced threat protection that uses AI to …
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
Offered more choices and a deeper library. Reporting was also easier to present to customers.
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
Better prepared campaigns in the library and more detailed platform with lots of features.
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
Ease of use and tracking better.
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
365 defender has a tool for user security training, it is much more rudimentary than Barracudas, but the interface is much nicer. Both offer email attack testing, reporting, and training, but barracuda offers additional attack types, like file and SMS testing. Both seem to …
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
Integration with existing Barracuda products and a large library, lots of features.
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
No-nonsense platform with very competitive pricing as it is bundled with an anti-spam mail solution (email gateway).
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
Barracuda Security Awareness Training from Barracuda Networks was already included in our TEP environment.
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
I didn't evaluate other products yet or don't need to, this has been recommended to me.
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
Diversity of campaigns, library depth, and integration with the security stack.
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
It was recommended by a number of people and we were impressed by Altinet
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
We used internal cyber security training, yearly one hour mandatory, Barracuda enhances this program.
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
Barracuda is much more price-conscious and offers a total package of security products along with their training. I believe SANS training is much deeper and offers a more diverse training program, as well as ramifications for those gamified users or those not passing initial …
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
Both products are very similar in providing a complete package for security awareness training, education, assessment, and ongoing evaluation. KnowBe4 has more functionality for the gamification aspect and a slightly richer template base for phishing simulations. Barracuda …
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
Barracuda is our leading backup solution for our customers so the product fits well
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
We have been a long-standing customer of Barracuda Backups Cloud to Cloud and Main Backups so this was a logical extension of what we had already been doing and the positive results we had been receiving on the other products
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
Our decision for phishing awareness training was based on multiple factors, we wanted an all-in-one suite for email protection and awareness training for the company. Barracuda security sweet covered everything we needed but the company's needs. We didn't want a piecemeal from …
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
The simulation can't be scheduled. They are by default scheduled 2 weeks after the end of the module. No customization in the training. The training path is not flexible. Users are forced to go through different topics one after another. It's not possible to choose for example …
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
Barracuda offers a large, feature-rich platform that deeply integrates with their other email security products. It is easy to set up and it offers a large library of English campaigns
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
Overall the products are very similar however as Barracuda offers a one-stop shop for email security and awareness training this is better preferred from an IT Admin Perspective
Chose Barracuda Email Protection
More detailed library overall, better reports and better integration with security stack
Cisco Cloud Email Security
Chose Cisco Cloud Email Security
It compares strongly to competitors with the granular protection (with the AI-powered Cisco Talos protection), particularly in large and hybrid environments. There is greater scalability, deeper control, and a high degree of compatibility with our Cisco infrastructure. The …
Chose Cisco Cloud Email Security
I would select Cisco for the Cloud Email Security solution because it has high availability. The integrations you have with solutions in the email cloud are very easy to integrate. Cisco Cloud Email Security is among the leaders in email protection solutions. It is important to …
Chose Cisco Cloud Email Security
Cisco was at least better than or equal to the others but within our budget. It provided all of the services of anti-spam, content filtering, anti-virus, DLP, encrypted email service, scalability, and more than the others. Cisco name and reputation were also key in our decision.
Informatica Data Archive (legacy)
Chose Informatica Data Archive (legacy)
[The] customer support is quite good. Cost also has another point to add, along with process integration and ease of using new tool.
Chose Informatica Data Archive (legacy)
My company currently uses Hadoop for big data management, as well as ParAccel/Matrix databases for storing the data. The combo is fairly effective, and the only reason we are exploring ILM is because of our use of other Informatica products, and looking to build in either …
Features
Barracuda Email ProtectionCisco Cloud Email SecurityInformatica Data Archive (legacy)
Secure Email Gateway
Comparison of Secure Email Gateway features of Product A and Product B
Barracuda Email Protection
8.7
Ratings
3% above category average
Cisco Cloud Email Security
8.6
Ratings
2% above category average
Informatica Data Archive (legacy)
-
Ratings
Anti-malware9.20 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Customizability7.80 Ratings10.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Loss Protection7.60 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Threat Detection8.80 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Sandboxing9.00 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
End-to-End Encryption10.00 Ratings9.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Management Tools8.20 Ratings8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Barracuda Email ProtectionCisco Cloud Email SecurityInformatica Data Archive (legacy)
Small Businesses
Zoho Mail
Zoho Mail
Score 9.2 out of 10
Zoho Mail
Zoho Mail
Score 9.2 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.9 out of 10
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.9 out of 10
Cove Data Protection
Cove Data Protection
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.9 out of 10
Avanan
Avanan
Score 9.9 out of 10
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Barracuda Email ProtectionCisco Cloud Email SecurityInformatica Data Archive (legacy)
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(0 ratings)
8.0
(0 ratings)
9.9
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.4
(0 ratings)
9.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Barracuda Email ProtectionCisco Cloud Email SecurityInformatica Data Archive (legacy)
Likelihood to Recommend
I would definitely recommend it due to the decent pricing. I wish the MS built-in M365 tools were better, but Barracuda does a good job of taking their place. For industries that need DLP on their email, like healthcare, banking, and education, Barracuda provides a reliable product for a good cost. The additional services you get, malware/AV filtering, URL filtering, spam protection, business continuity, those are all icing on the cake. The only issues we've ever really had with them is that it will sometimes take a back/forth string of emails and decide randomly to encrypt it, so what was a flowing benign conversation is now locked behind a wall for recipients. As the sender, you have no idea when it's going to decide to do this and have to remember to tag emails with a decrypt tag long before it happens or face the consequences
Read full review
The most appropriate scenarios to implement email security is in companies that want to protect the use of electronic mail since it is one of the security breaches that are currently used to perform any type of attack. Very effective integration with Office 365 and it is highly recommended to add the functionality of advanced malware protection
Read full review
To manage users, go to the admin dashboard, here is a section for users. In this users section here you can see which users are configured and you have the ability to suspend a user. If you want to edit or add users, you need to go to the Organization section, then click on another user section there, which then gives you the ability to edit or add users.
Read full review
Pros
  • The software helps us create emails that look exactly or almost exactly the same as the phishing emails we found in our email gateway.
  • We already use the ESS gateway from Barracuda Networks, and in the TEP bundle, this software is included, so it's not that much work to also configure this.
  • In the software, we can see reports on how our users performed. We can make a selection of users that are more prone to click on "false" links, and this way, we can help them individually.
Read full review
  • Incoming mail policies and content filtering are easy to implement.
  • Security aspects of the service are great at filtering out unwanted traffic: anti-spam, anti-virus (Sophos and Mcafee), Cisco AMP, outbreak filters, reputation filtering, etc.).
  • Email tracking through the SMA is a breeze, so if you have specific users that are having problems in the receipt of emails, research into the problem is quick and easy.
  • The reporting is detailed for operations and security functions.
Read full review
  • It's not a major problem, but it's an example of one of many small annoyances.
  • Also, there is no proper documentation available
Read full review
Cons
  • The #1 feedback I receive from users is that they have limited time for training. It would be nice if the training would be offered in 3-time categories (e.g. up to 3 minutes, up to 5 minutes and up to 10 minutes). This way user's can select a category that matches their availability.
Read full review
  • Initial configuration takes time to perform as it is a very powerful solution.
  • Limited context sensitive help.
Read full review
  • No [suggestions for] improvement as such we amazed with the performance and the services
  • Standalone not integrated with power center
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Although cost competitive, we still feel like we are not digging deep enough to train our staff. We have little to no way other than digging through reports that have not proven to be adequately documented (hey you, Barracuda campaign reports) to identify and require users to take more training who have not passed their requirements.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Usability
Regarding usability, we like it to be an easy solution to implement and configure on the server. Routine backups are made frequently and reports are issued for control and analysis by information security teams. It has great integration with the cloud and encryption.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I have not had to use customer support yet which goes to show the effectiveness of the program. It also shows how easy the program is to use for the average person with no experience using this type of program. Our IT department also does a great job at teaching us to detect emails with malware that in combination with this software issues rarely arise even though we have over 500 employees.
Read full review
Cisco TAC support is very good since they have engineers available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. Important to mention that you must have the support of the solution enabled to be able to receive a response from TAC and that we can be taken care of. The only drawback may be that they will not be able to see settings of the email provider you use.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
It was "stupid easy" from the technical side.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
We really didn't evaluate any other products. We considered using the filtering features that come with our Office 365 subscription, but just didn't feel it was sufficient protection for our business. Being a medical clinic, we felt like we needed to implement the best solution for our email protection and we found Barracuda Essentials was the leader.
Read full review
It compares strongly to competitors with the granular protection (with the AI-powered Cisco Talos protection), particularly in large and hybrid environments. There is greater scalability, deeper control, and a high degree of compatibility with our Cisco infrastructure. The deployment is straightforward in the Cisco environment, so the choice over competitors is pretty clear.
Read full review
My company currently uses Hadoop for big data management, as well as ParAccel/Matrix databases for storing the data. The combo is fairly effective, and the only reason we are exploring ILM is because of our use of other Informatica products, and looking to build in either synergies between the technologies, or cost savings by bundling all our licensing through one vendor (Informatica)
Read full review
Return on Investment
  • We have had no issues with malware or virus's getting through our email system
  • We've saved countless hours with users being able to quickly add email senders to whitelists or blacklists through the intuitive interface
  • Users can manage every aspect of their own email - reporting suspicious email, accessing their email archive, etc...
Read full review
  • Data breaches and data loss can be extremely detrimental to any company. So far this security tool has been a great investment in preventing any form of data compromise.
Read full review
  • Tracking the usage of specific brackets of data across the entire organisation has now become possible.
  • The team was already using PowerCenter. Therefore, using ILM was a very apt decision that allowed easier management of data at the organisation level.
Read full review
ScreenShots