Easy Projects is a project management tool designed for a wide range of businesses (small to mid-sized and enterprise level). It includes both basic features like creating projects and tasks and filling in the calendar, and also some advanced ones, including an interactive Gantt chart, an executive dashboard, time tracking and billing. It provides integration with MS Outlook, is customizable and has SaaS/On-Premise options.
$15
per month
Contractor Foreman
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Contractor Foreman is an online construction management software for contractors and boasts users among contractors in more than 75 countries.
$588
per year
Pricing
Birdview
Contractor Foreman
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$6
per month
Business
$12
per month
Platform
$19
per month
Basic
$588
per year
Standard
$948
per year
Plus
$1,497
per year
Pro
$1,990
per year
Unlimited
$2,988
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Birdview
Contractor Foreman
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Plans are based on features and licenses needed. Plus, Pro, and Unlimited plans include a 100-day money back guarantee.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Birdview
Contractor Foreman
Features
Birdview
Contractor Foreman
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
8.1
15 Ratings
5% above category average
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
Task Management
8.514 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
7.113 Ratings
00 Ratings
Gantt Charts
8.57 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Team Collaboration
7.513 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
7.58 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document Management
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email integration
7.911 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
7.97 Ratings
00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
8.912 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
8.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
8.97 Ratings
00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
8.3
5 Ratings
7% above category average
Contractor Foreman
-
Ratings
Project & financial reporting
7.55 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with accounting software
9.11 Ratings
00 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.5
53 Ratings
1% below category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
8.147 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
8.750 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
7.83 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
8.43 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
4.65 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
5.9
4 Ratings
25% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
4.63 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
3.74 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
4.51 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
6.43 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
6.52 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
7.5
2 Ratings
3% above category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
7.52 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
8.8
67 Ratings
13% above category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
8.966 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
8.861 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
8.857 Ratings
Data exportability
00 Ratings
8.656 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Birdview
-
Ratings
Contractor Foreman
8.1
71 Ratings
6% above category average
Plan distribution & viewing
00 Ratings
5.55 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing
00 Ratings
6.245 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists
00 Ratings
8.861 Ratings
Photo documentation
00 Ratings
8.670 Ratings
Jobsite reports
00 Ratings
9.262 Ratings
Document sharing
00 Ratings
8.466 Ratings
RFI tools
00 Ratings
9.453 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals
00 Ratings
8.958 Ratings
Mobile app
00 Ratings
8.871 Ratings
Submittal design and management
00 Ratings
7.550 Ratings
Checklists
00 Ratings
9.062 Ratings
Meeting Minutes
00 Ratings
8.13 Ratings
Specifications
00 Ratings
5.54 Ratings
Change orders
00 Ratings
9.062 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Each member of our team can choose their own view, so they can see only what is relevant to them. Plus, we can keep track of everyone's progress without bothering them. Our team loves that everyone can have a different view, so they see only what's important to them. In addition, we can keep tabs on everyone's progress without pestering them. The user interface has some nice quality of life features, such as the different views for different members of our team.
Contractor Foreman has been a great tool for managing a variety of projects, from home remodels to large-scale builds. It works especially well for keeping everything organized in one place, whether it’s estimates, schedules, or job costs. One scenario where it’s been really useful is in managing multiple jobs at once. With several remodels and new construction projects happening at the same time, having a centralized system to track progress, store documents, and communicate with subcontractors has helped keep everything on schedule. It’s also great for estimating—being able to quickly generate and send professional proposals has made bidding much more efficient. It’s especially well-suited for projects that require a lot of moving parts, like tracking permits and compliance documents. For larger jobs, like school construction, it helps ensure that all approvals, budgets, and schedules stay on track without getting lost in a mess of paperwork. Where it’s less ideal is for smaller, one-off jobs where a full project management system might be overkill. If it’s just a quick repair or a simple remodel, sometimes it’s easier to just handle things manually. The mobile app could also be a bit more intuitive for on-site use, especially for field updates and quick changes. Overall, it’s a strong tool for contractors managing multiple projects, budgets, and teams. It keeps things organized and saves time, especially on jobs that require detailed tracking and coordination.
Easy Projects has some problems when it comes to accessing the site via different methods/browsers. It is either very slow or never works on a tablet. It is not smart-phone friendly. And it stopped working for us in Firefox -- all we could use is Safari or Chrome (we are a Mac-based office).
Easy Projects' email notifications are overwhelming. I turned them off completely since I was getting messages every time one little detail was added or changed.
While the reports are great, they are somewhat hard to pull. It takes a lot of trial and error -- I would not say the reports are an "intuitive area."
The biggest by far is what we fondly call "the screen of death." When you mark the last open task associated with a job as complete, a screen pops up that asks if you want to close the overall job, as well. The "yes" field is pre-selected, so if you are overzealous and click through quickly, it automatically closes the job. I don't know why they think this feature is helpful. We have so many staffers that complain they suddenly can't find their open job -- well, it's been marked completed and goes into the archive.
Security and sensitive file visibility. Users with no permissions can have access to some hidden files.
Daily log navigation. Users now need to exit one log entirely to view or check another, resulting in a significant waste of time and reduced efficiency.
Customization options for reports. No options to set up and automatically send reports by email to specified users.
EP is great but could be better. EP has been a wonderful tool within our organization, it has helped us control expenses, resources, and the time needed to invest in each project, however when it comes to presenting reports and details it is a bit weak, there are more tools specialized in data visualization, and it would be good to make some kind of integration between EP and the other market alternatives
Overall, Contractor Foreman is a great product, and I’m sure we’ve only scratched the surface of everything it has to offer. It can be a little quirky at times, occasionally displaying a 'Bad Gateway' message, but we haven’t experienced any timeout issues in the past few months. As we continue to use it, I’m confident we’ll uncover even more ways to streamline our workflow
Many times we had issues that turned out to be errors and bugs. At first, we would be told forcefully that there were no bugs, then we would document them, and we would get an acknowledgement but no apology for essentially either gaslighting us or being ignorant of their system
In my personal experience, I only needed EP support once and the truth is that they attended me very well and very quickly, they helped me with what I needed, it was a question regarding the use of WebServices, they solved my doubt and then they contacted me another agent to verify that everything was resolved and if they could help me with anything else
We have only had one issue the entire time we have had Contractor Foreman and that was that we had the hardest time getting the platform to allow us to log in, but we called our support and within 5 mins we able to log back in
East Projects integrates with other financial systems such as NetSuite and Compass, which allows a great financial view into the existing and future projects and overall financial health of our resourcing. Other systems, such as Wrike and MS Projects, just focus on project/task management, whereas this is a one-stop shop. It also allows us to manage internal resources.
There's just no comparing these two. I'm actually going to suggest we keep CE to my boss, and here's why: Clearestimates is perfect for what I just described. You have a little job that you just BOOM it's done? Put it into Clearestimates. That system does not care at all if you did it "properly." Now Contractor Foreman does so. much. more. than CE. It just does. You can do everything on CF (just not anything haha). Most businesses wouldn't need anything else, but since we're still growing, we do some handyman stuff every now and again that CE is perfect for, and we don't have to go through CF's really picky system to make sure every little tiny thing is correct
Increased team collaboration improved the results significantly, because we managed to reduce the amount of time wasted on unnecessary iterations, therefore reducing costs.
The reasonable pricing enabled us to enjoy the service we needed with with less impact on our budget than we've expected.
Prior to using Contractor Foreman we had to wait until the end to capture all change orders in one summary. Now, with the client portal, we can capture in real time and the client has visibility.
We have been trying to reduce administration time in tracking field expenses and with Contractor Foreman our field crew can uplaod reciepts and track expenses right from their mobile phones.
Punchlist - the punch list and To Do features are so robust we have drastically improved getting punchlists and small tasks completed in single trips without the wasted time and travel of multiple trips due to missed/forgotten items.