BlackLine automates the the processes required to finalize periodic closing of the books. Beyond close/reconciliation management the product includes capabilities to enhance the management and control of financial processes throughout the accounting cycle. In October 2020, BlackLine acquired Rimilia, an AR automation solution. Rimilia's capabilities are now part of the BlackLine platform.
N/A
FloQast
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
FloQast offers their financial close software to streamline accounting month end close, simply providing automation around reconciliation and eliminating human error, and visibility via a close status dashboard, as well as providing a complete audit trail.
At the time of evaluation, FloQast just offered a web system that effectively did what we were already doing. It provided the ability to be SOX compliant which we didn't really need. Blackline offers a level of automation and integration unparalleled in the industry. We …
Both are great products and I’ve used both. Successfully implemented FloQast to great success. Looking at the BlackLine approach currently due to size and complexity and my desire to build a best-in-class shop with appropriate scale and the potential for further enhancements …
Better depth of product. You can have specific items in account reconciliations besides just an Excel spreadsheet. This increases the visibility of account reconciliations. You can use the reporting functionality to view each of these items, and classify them (temporary timing, …
FloQast is cheaper, but Blackline is more automated and facilitates comparability between periods because it stores historical information side by side with current periods, whereas FloQast really only provided tie-out functionality within Excel documents. Those Excel documents …
For FloQast, the answer is easy as they have built their platform around integration with existing Excel workbooks which is exactly what we were trying to get away from. Cadency has a lot of similarities to BlackLine and in some areas it had a more fluid UI experience however …
Blackline outperformed both FloQast and Vena in our RFP. The staff felt that Blackline was the most user-friendly. Both FloQast and Vena try to sell you on linking to already saved documents instead of saving documents onto their systems. They're both more of an Excel …
At the time, FloQast did not have the tasks function, which was important to us as we maintained our close process in an excel checklist. We were not able to know timely if all steps were completed.
We also assessed the FloQast platform. We felt BlackLine offers more functionality which is why we chose the platform. FloQast was limited in what they offered and also did not automate reconciliations greatly as they would still be completed in Excel. BlackLine also has many …
I have not used any of the other products, but we did evaluate them during our discovery phase. BlackLine was the "Cadillac" of the product offerings. You could get a similar product, and maybe even at a lower cost, but we wanted the best of the best, and that's what BlackLine …
user experience and customer service was better. Pricing was also favorable with the additional features. Account manager for our company is proactive in working with us, getting full attention. Great support and recommendations on how to implement other features of the …
BlackLine has a lot of robust features, such as being able to push transactions into NetSuite as well as import bank transactions and NetSuite transactions for bank reconciliation matching. FloQast does not currently push any transactions to NetSuite. FloQast is way more …
I chose FloQast over BlackLine because we could easily pull reports from our CRM, ERP and other systems and use those as backup for reconciliations. When I reviewed BlackLine we had to enter everything into their system and it felt like we would be spending time duplicating …
Chalk and Cheese! BlackLine took months to implement with little adoption from our users, FloQast was an easy painless implementation, and it was very quickly adopted by our users. FloQast is also so flexible and doesn't require a lot of admin to manage the reconciliation …
I like both- I do like that BlackLine forces people to enter reconciliation lines in the actual module, versus just uploading an excel. However I like that FQ allows you to add review notes, and the review notes will email directly to people.
FloQast provides support without getting in the way of the process (at the time of considering options, BlackLine got in the way with required journal entry park and post steps). It allows for enough flexibility to adjust between team members for sharing coverage in a small …
We evaluated BlackLine when we were considering Floqast. Although BlackLine is very robust and feature rich it was not right for us at the time of our review. We chose Floqast because: 1. It was simple to set up. We were up in running in a few weeks as compared to the 6 month …
We evaluated BlackLine along with FloQast and ultimately decided to sign up with FloQast. Our team really liked the ability to leverage their existing Excel reconciliation templates that could link to the FloQast user interface. Comparatively, the pre-made reconciliation …
I used BlackLine many years ago but found it to be a waste of time. I didn't like being required to use the BlackLine format for reconciliations. The one size fits all mentality never quite works out when it comes to accounting - every business does things a little differently. …
We found that FloQast fit well into our existing close process and made it much more efficient. Other rooms, such as BlackLine, required a longer and more costly implementation. It also required the use of their reconciliation formats. We did not see the value in that …
The User Interface and implementation were the key drivers for choosing FloQast compared to BlackLine.
Verified User
Director
Chose FloQast
Having FloQast automatically pulls updates from excel files saved in our shared folders is key instead of having to upload new files as we've done in the past with other comparable products
The User Interface and implementation were the key drivers for choosing FQ compared to BL. Our team was up in a matter of days or so it felt! Even if you didn't get properly trained in FQ, you could easily figure it out on your own, which was nice, especially for a large team.
We selected FloQast because of how flexible it was and how easily it incorporated our existing excel workpapers into the system. It was also able to accommodate our ERP, despite not having a native integration for it.
Lower cost for a much better, well organized software that on face value is far easier to use. It meant we didn't have to drastically change our close process too much whilst implementing a new system
Verified User
Employee
Chose FloQast
FloQast is much easier to use. The system is user friendly which is very beneficial when you are or are training new employees. I think the use is extremely streamlined so there is no question of where the company is at in the closing or reporting process. The …
We selected FloQast because we found it much more intuitive to use, while meeting our needs. The customer experience with FloQast throughout the software review process was also more pleasant.