Bound (formerly Get Smart Content) is a website segmentation and targeting platform that enables marketers to read a website visitor's digital body language and serve relevant content based on the person's stage in the buying journey. Using behavioral, demographic, and firmographic data, Bound creates personalized web experiences for both anonymous and known website visitors to increase the effectiveness of marketing efforts and dramatically reduce the buyer's path to conversion. Bound partners…
N/A
Vero Cloud
Score8 out of 10
N/A
Vero Workflows is an email marketing solution built to make customer engagement simpler with features such as in-app behavior tracking, audience segmentation, and workflow automation.
$54
per month
Pricing
Bound
Vero Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Starter
$54
per month
Pro
$219
per month
Growth
$549
per month
Enterprise
$1,429
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Bound
Vero Cloud
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
Optional
Additional Details
—
15% discount applied with an annual subscription, paid upfront.
More Pricing Information
Features
Bound
Vero Cloud
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Bound and Vero Cloud
Feature
Bound
9.7
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Vero Cloud
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Split URL testing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multivariate testing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile app testing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test significance
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Advanced code editor
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page surveys
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Visitor recordings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Preview mode
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test duration calculator
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Client-side tests
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Server-side tests
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Bound and Vero Cloud
Feature
Bound
9.8
1 Ratings
11% above category average
Vero Cloud
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Website personalization
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Bound and Vero Cloud
Feature
Bound
9.4
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Vero Cloud
-
Ratings
Heatmap tool
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Click analytics
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scroll maps
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form fill analysis
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Conversion tracking
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Goal tracking
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Test reporting
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Results segmentation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
CSV export
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Bound and Vero Cloud
Feature
Bound
-
Ratings
Vero Cloud
8.1
2 Ratings
1% above category average
WYSIWYG email editor
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Dynamic content
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Mobile optimization
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
List management
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Bound and Vero Cloud
Vero tends to play nice with companies that have their websites as the primary source of truth. This allows them to send as many events as they need and develop more complex workflows that introduce conditionality into Vero emails. However, for those that rely more on Salesforce, it might have more limited applications. The product is fairly easy to use, so it's easy for multiple people on the team to pick it up and do what they need for their respective groups. On the other hand, creating email templates will require some knowledge of HTML/CSS, unless those are copied from another source. That would require another product of course that provides more robust layout editing features and templates.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
While Vero offers some WYSIWYG editing, it's on the limited side, as it mostly allows you to edit copy, but not necessarily the layout.
The UI/UX has improved dramatically over the course of the last few years, but it can still lag from time to time and experience sluggishness.
While reliability is really good, it does have lapses from time to time that will introduce delays into emails being sent out. Once or twice, the system went completely down for a period of time.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It has the inability to export subject line or ISP complaints that require manual pulling by each campaign when needed. Results from variable tests are also reported only as a percentage of chosen KPI (opens, clicks, etc.). There's no ability to see hard numbers from the tests or other metrics to determine the statistical significance or unintended results (maybe opens increased per the test, but we saw clicks or conversions were lower). On the other hand, Bound performs absolutely great.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Vero's price tag is far more attractive but for what you will find to be clear and obvious reasons. Vero has no CRM unlike HubSpot and Infusionsoft. Vero also has limited tracking unlike the seemingly endless possibilities offered from HubSpot which as we all know comes with at a significant cost, often not feasible by a small startup company.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have seen more traffic going to revenue generating sites after using Get Smart Content. I'm not sure of the dollar amount since that's a separate department, but traffic increasing is great.
Engagement on our internal site has increased after implementing Get Smart Content. We are getting more views, comments and likes on our content than before.
The overall costs of using Vero have been much lower than using two comparable products that handle transactional emails and newsletters, respectively. MailChimp has relatively recently integrated their Mandrill product for transactional emails, so that's worth looking at as well.
Using a single product for many things lowers the learning curve, as team members only have to learn one product well, rather than several.
While infrequent, Vero's outages have impacted our operations at times. If absolute reliability is crucial to your business, then you may have to find a larger provider with a more robust infrastructure. As mentioned, though, it hasn't been a big problem for us.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info