Brave Software’s privacy-oriented browser, combined with its blockchain-based digital advertising platform, aims to provide more secure access to the Web for users, publishers and advertisers. Their mission is to provide users a private, speedier Web experience with much longer battery life, help publishers increase their revenue share, and advertisers to achieve better conversion. Headquartered in San Francisco, Brave currently has over 50 million monthly active users and 15 million daily…
N/A
Jahia Digital Experience Platform
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Jahia is a Java-based enterprise content management system. It features an integrated user portal, web publishing and content management, document management, collaboration, and multi-channel publishing.
N/A
Progress Sitefinity
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Progress Sitefinity is a content management and customer analytics platform. It supports content management, tailored marketing, multi-channel management, and ecommerce sites.
N/A
Pricing
Brave
Jahia Digital Experience Platform
Progress Sitefinity
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Brave
Jahia Digital Experience Platform
Progress Sitefinity
Free Trial
No
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Brave
Jahia Digital Experience Platform
Progress Sitefinity
Features
Brave
Jahia Digital Experience Platform
Progress Sitefinity
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Brave
-
Ratings
Jahia Digital Experience Platform
8.0
34 Ratings
2% below category average
Progress Sitefinity
8.1
163 Ratings
0% below category average
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
8.034 Ratings
8.1163 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Brave
-
Ratings
Jahia Digital Experience Platform
8.5
35 Ratings
5% above category average
Progress Sitefinity
8.1
144 Ratings
0% below category average
API
00 Ratings
7.93 Ratings
8.1137 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
00 Ratings
9.035 Ratings
8.1106 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Brave
-
Ratings
Jahia Digital Experience Platform
6.6
35 Ratings
9% below category average
Progress Sitefinity
8.0
170 Ratings
11% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
00 Ratings
9.034 Ratings
8.1160 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
00 Ratings
1.130 Ratings
8.0151 Ratings
Admin section
00 Ratings
8.333 Ratings
8.0168 Ratings
Page templates
00 Ratings
8.034 Ratings
8.1164 Ratings
Library of website themes
00 Ratings
4.12 Ratings
8.0104 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
00 Ratings
8.033 Ratings
8.0155 Ratings
Publishing workflow
00 Ratings
7.133 Ratings
8.1152 Ratings
Form generator
00 Ratings
7.026 Ratings
8.0140 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
For day to day use it works fine both business and personal. I find it fast and reliable. We are not using the LEO ai feature since we are already using ChatGPT but we probably should check it out as there may be some real benefit from a more integrated application. We have some company specific extensions which were important to us and so far they have all worked exceedingly well.
In my experience, Jahia Digital Experience Platform as a CMS platform is excellent when you have a large amount of content that needs to be customized. It is also good for when you have templated content that has minor variations. I would say it is less appropriate when the content has numerous mathematical computations, or a large amount of business logic that comes into play with data processing.
Progress Sitefinity remains a little heavyweight for sites that require basic text content, or a limited number of pages. However, its flexibility (including the range of different content types if supports) make it a good choice for any organization requiring advanced content management capabilities at an affordable price.
'Low-code structured content' (dynamic content types) is one of Sitefinity's most powerful features that allows you to structure content according to business needs, while at the same time dampening editorial freedom to ensure accessibility, meta enhancement, SEO and API consumption can be achieved.
Sitefinity's content provider model allows us to flexibly (by means of admin interface) easily aggregate or separate content sharing within a multi-site instance.
This proofs particularly powerful in emerging situations where there suddenly is a demand for content sharing across countries or regions.
Adaptability at its core.
While there's never a perfect fit for everything, it allows for easy code customization and extension being a .NET application at heart. Giving it a corporate edge over other custom solutions, whether it is on the development side or deployment side (on premise, IaaS or Azure DevOps Paas). And it has enabled us to put the system to use in its core feature - which is to manage content, where on other occasions we were able to take full advantage of its features such as A/B testing and personalization.
Brave's user interface, while generally intuitive, it could provide more options for customization and personalization. Allowing user to customize the browser's appearance, layout, and settings to a greater extent would enhance the user experience and cater to individual preferences.
While Brave offers syncing across devices, including mobile platforms, sometimes there are issues with the reliability and consistency of syncing bookmarks, settings, and browsing history. Improving the syncing functionality and addressing any potential inconsistencies would be valuable for users who rely on seamless integration across multiple devices.
It lacks the ability to manage multiple versions of a page or content in general.
The back office interface sometimes encounters bugs or display problems.
It's difficult to keep pre-production sites up to date in terms of content compared to production, because the time required to import/export sites is very long once the site is rich in content.
Diagram or illustrate more use cases for server setups, and managing of upgrades.
I'd like to see the ability to synchronize from one server to multiple others at once.
Implementation assistance as part of the purchase rather than farming out to 3rd party, although they did answer every question we asked in order to determine our best architecture setup.
I would not use Jahia as it proved too complex for our needs and didn't help our over goal of customer satisfaction. Along with the man hours to build and execute, it wasn't worth the hassle
The interface and ergonomics are designed to facilitate the use of the product. The creation of template is easy which allows to minimize the actions necessary for the provision of content.
Very big fan of this CMS, as it allows scalability, performance, and everything else. The support is great whenever we need it. As a marketer, the digital/marketing side of things is very easy to use and we've seen strong results from an SEO and marketing perspective. I can't speak to the developer/creative side too much, but in talking with these teams, they do recommend the tool as well.
[I give it this rating because it] was up most of the time. There are so many scheduled reboots that I don't think it would be a good choice for a 95% SLA.
As I was saying, the support makes sure to be available for any question, or any technical point that we may need to discuss about. Moreover, whenever we have an issue with the platform they get alerted and also send us an email so that we are aware. We had multiple complex topics to work on in the past, but they always have been answering our question
Support can be pretty good, even though, depending on the level of licensing, it can take longer to hear back from their team. They do have a phone option, which works well. Overall, they are knowledgeable, and helpful when needed. At times, support is able to access the system directly and troubleshoot critical items when needed.
N/A - I was not part of the implementation team. We have had this internally for over 5 years. Based on my experience, ensure that you have documentation on the initial implementation and subsequent upgrades. I would also recommend to have all the documentation on how and why the system was implemented the way it was
We'll Simply put, we are still using Brave exclusively, so unless we're idiots, which we're not, Brave does a much better job than those other 5. We've also tried using Opera which isn't in the list and same thing, it didn't deliver the performance or features that we needed so back to Brave it was. What's unusual to us is that Brave is built on the Chromium platform, so you'd think ChromeOS would be better, but it's not.
Jahia provides a similar user experience to other CMS I have used in the past - it features a simple interface that makes navigating and learning how to use the platform easy and the ability to copy and paste content saves time and effort when building new pages. The ease in which you can manage the site in different languages is also a big plus!
It is hands down just easier for our customers to use. The interface and the page builder experience is much better than what we have used in the past and has many enterprise features even in the lower price-point