TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about BrowserStack

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

BrowserStack

Connect with BrowserStack

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with BrowserStack so that BrowserStack and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Contact about Tricentis qTest

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Tricentis

Connect with Tricentis

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Tricentis so that Tricentis and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    BrowserStack

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/ABrowserStack is a test platform built for developers and QAs to expand test coverage, scale and optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability. BrowserStack states it currently powers over a billion tests a year for customers who include Amazon, Paypal, Well Fargo Bank, Nvidia, MongoDB, Pfizer, GE, Discovery, React JS, Apache, JQuery and several others rely on BrowserStack to test their web and mobile apps.

    $0

    per month Unlimited users and 5000 free screenshots

    Tricentis qTest

    Score8.7 out of 10
    N/ATricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018.

    $1,200

    per year per user

    Pricing
    BrowserStackTricentis qTest
    Editions & Modules
    Percy - Free
    $0
    per month Unlimited users and 5000 free screenshots
    App Percy - Free
    $0
    per month 5000 free screenshots and 100 minutes of infrastructure
    Test Observability - Unlimited Free
    $0
    Accessibility Testing - Free
    $0
    Test Observability - Observability Pro
    $0.01
    per month per test execution
    Percy - Desktop
    $0.02
    per month per screenshot
    App Percy - Visual Core
    $0.02
    per month per screenshot
    Percy - Desktop & Mobile
    $0.02
    per month per screenshot
    App Percy - Visual Cloud
    $0.03
    per month per screenshot
    Live - Desktop
    $39
    per month per user
    Live - Desktop & Mobile
    $49
    per month per user
    App Live - Individual
    $49
    per month per user
    Automate - Desktop
    $129
    per month 1 parallel test
    Live - Team
    $175
    per month 5 users
    App Live - Team
    $175
    per month 5 users
    Accessibility Testing - Team
    $199
    per month 5 users
    Automate - Desktop & Mobile
    $225
    per month 1 parallel test
    App Automate - Device Cloud
    $249
    per month 1 parallel test
    App Live - Team Pro
    $289
    per month 5 users
    App Automate - Device Cloud Pro
    $299
    per month 1 parallel test
    Automate - Enterprise
    Contact sales team
    Percy - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    App Automate - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    App Live - Enterprise
    Contact sales team
    Live - Enterprise
    Contact sales team
    App Automate - Device Cloud Pro + Visual Cloud
    Contact Sales
    App Percy - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Test Observability - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    Accessibility Testing - Enterprise
    Contact Sales
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    BrowserStackTricentis qTest
    Free Trial
    YesYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    BrowserStackTricentis qTest
    Considered Both Products
    BrowserStack
    No answer on this topic
    Tricentis
    Chose Tricentis qTest
    None of our previous tools we listed in the available drop-down options. We had previously used Spira Test and Xray as our test repositories. We are currently evaluating Test Rail, Zephyr, PractiTest, and others.

    From an organizational perspective, qTest is better than Xray as …
    Incentivized
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    97%
    Would buy again
    273 Answers
    78%
    Would buy again
    31 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    97%
    Delivers good value for the price
    229 Answers
    84%
    Delivers good value for the price
    26 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    98%
    Happy with the feature set
    277 Answers
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    37 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    189 Answers
    78%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    98%
    Implementation went as expected
    231 Answers
    90%
    Implementation went as expected
    27 Answers
    Features
    BrowserStackTricentis qTest
    Test Management
    Comparison of Test Management features of BrowserStack and Tricentis qTest
    Feature
    BrowserStack
    -
    Ratings
    Tricentis qTest
    8.3
    38 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Centralized test management00 Ratings8.037 Ratings
    Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings8.832 Ratings
    Map tests to user stories00 Ratings7.68 Ratings
    Test execution reporting00 Ratings9.237 Ratings
    Defect management00 Ratings7.932 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    BrowserStackTricentis qTest
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlazeMeter
    Score8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Tricentis Tosca
    Score8.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    BrowserStackTricentis qTest
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.8
    (303 ratings)
    8.9
    (40 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.1
    (20 ratings)
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    8.4
    (25 ratings)
    7.7
    (3 ratings)
    Availability
    8.7
    (6 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    6.2
    (79 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.1
    (26 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    7.3
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    7.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.8
    (9 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    8.3
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    8.1
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    9.2
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Professional Services
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    8.1
    (5 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    BrowserStackTricentis qTest
    Likelihood to Recommend
    BrowserStack
    BrowserStack is very useful if you need to troubleshoot a client's reported experience from using an older device or browser version that you do not own and can not personally replicate in-house. For instance, if you are in a Windows environment and your client has a Mac, or if you have iPhones and they have Android. It's also great for ensuring that above-the-fold content is presented effectively across a variety of mobile devices and optimizing visitor experiences. If you are a small business with lower client volumes where these services are needed, then the price point may be high.
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    Tricentis qTest integrates seamlessly with Jira, making it ideal for teams that manage user stories and defects in Jira while keeping test cases and execution in qTest. When paired with automation tools like tosca, Selenium, or WebdriverIO, qTest is excellent for aggregating both manual and automated test results in one place.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    BrowserStack
    • Tests Android and iOS on real devices on cloud, without the need to purchase the devices.
    • Run Maestro tests and other frameworks on real devices, reporting the errors to be fixed to developers or the test workflows that failed to the QA team.
    • The quality reports at the end of the tests are really good, because they contain videos of the tests being performed on the devices. So, not only text, I can check the behavior of the application exactly how it runs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • Tricentis qTest manages test cases very well and keeps step by step by details of each and every scenarios
    • Tricentis qTest provides all the details related to functionality in a single place which saves time and efforts of QA
    • QA doesnt require much knowledge for test case execution as every details are there in Tricentis qTest test cases which saves the time of knowledge transfer
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    BrowserStack
    • The documentation needs to improve for browser edge cases, such as "approving permissions automatically". There are several "solutions" posted, none of which worked. I needed to go to Discord to get the real solution.
    • Documentation in general seems to provide answers that are unclear or flaky
    • There needs to be a more reliable way to programmatically choose device, platform, and window size by being able to query a 'plan' endpoint instead of just 'failing the combination.'
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • We can add some more integration features with JIRA so the users can directly mark the test as executed from JIRA itself when functional testing is done.
    • Tricentis qTest can provide some features like sending reminders for retesting if there are failed test cases marked while testing to keep Tricentis qTest up to date.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    BrowserStack
    It's almost the 3rd year for us and it's renewal time for us. So yes, we are already discussing how many licenses we need to increase as users are increasing internally. So it's 100% sure that we are already planning renewal this year as well BrowserStack with live and app automate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    This has been a core QA management tool for our organization and integrates well with our other SDLC platforms (Azure DevOps/Jira/Katalon).
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    BrowserStack
    So many options that it can be a little overwhelming, but the core functions are easy to find and use and it's usually not too hard to figure things out for the more complex tasks. Very easy to boot up a device and a specific browser from the dashboard to begin a manual website test.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    It successfully balances deep enterprise functionality with a clean and modern interface. One of its strongest points is the intuitive, folder based navigation, which makes organizing test case and cycles feel natural. Learning curve is relatively shallow for the new team members to become productive without extensive onboarding. Also the deep integration with JIRA is a significant boost to its usability.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    BrowserStack
    I rated BrowserStack's availability a 10 because it is consistently reliable, with minimal to no downtime or unplanned outages. The platform is accessible whenever needed, ensuring uninterrupted testing. Its robust infrastructure and proactive monitoring ensure a seamless experience, allowing us to meet deadlines without delays caused by availability issues and all
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    BrowserStack
    The tests are fast considering the fact that they're Appium tests. I've seen tests reliably pass or fail when they're supposed to, with next to zero issues on the BrowserStack side of things. Tests launch only seconds after I kick off them off from my CLI.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    BrowserStack
    I've not had much direct interaction with the BrowserStack support team. The help and community are great and we've not run into any issue that has really required us to reach out. I guess having a stable and easy to use system means you may never need to contact support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    The actual answer is 0. I have never experienced worse support, whether personal or professional
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    BrowserStack
    Yes, it was online training on meet, and trainer looks like skilled and technical strong, he has covered end to end all the features and he has answers all the queries. because of this trainings we are able to implement it by our own in the organization, thank you for support and training.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    BrowserStack
    It was a quick training from the support of browserstack, it was nice and easy to understand, thanks again for the support given by the team. and regularly I used to receive mails for training from support for any new feature they launch, I was able to spread same training to all my team and dev.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation Rating
    BrowserStack
    I rated the implementation satisfaction an 8 because while it went smoothly overall, there were some challenges during the initial learning phase and integration with existing tools. Key insights include the importance of providing sufficient training upfront and ensuring seamless integration with other systems to minimize disruptions and improve adoption speed.
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    Again, supporting documentation could have been a lot better
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    BrowserStack
    BrowserStack is simpler and more user friendly than Sauce Labs and can be easily learned by any individual who is new to it and does not require much efforts. Also, BrowserStack is more trusted by the clients that we offer services to, and is always considered the best option among others.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, user-centric interface contrasts with ALM's more dated appearance and complex setup. While TestRail provides a clean user experience and caters to a broad spectrum of business, qTest's scalability, from SMBs to large enterprises, stands out. PractiTest's cloud-based solution is geared towards mid-sized companies, but qTest's flexibility, advanced analytics, and robust reporting grant teams actionable insights. qTest' approach to a more holistic test management closely aligning with modern software development practices
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Contract Terms and Pricing Model
    BrowserStack
    No Vendors were involved, directly dealt with Browserstack
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Scalability
    BrowserStack
    I may not be the best person to answer this as I am only using it for 1 department and at 1 site but will still try my best As far as Scalability for Devices for Mobile Automation is concerned, it gets a Solid 10, as the users can run cases on upto 10 device parallel and also have the best choices of devices to choose
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Professional Services
    BrowserStack
    Not used
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    BrowserStack
    • Browserstack improved our internal confidence level when it came to signing off on testing
    • Browserstack improved the confidence level of our clients by decreasing the number of bugs found during PVT and providing an entry level opportunity for our clients to perform UAT using the same tools.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • Integrating qTest in our workflow helped us in 52% reduction in test authoring effort
    • Overall project management and the time calculation for the quality checking of each project can be managed good in qTest
    • It provides full tracability of a single project from the requirements to the defects raised it helps our team a lot
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    BrowserStack Screenshots

    Product screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshotProduct screenshot

    Tricentis qTest Screenshots

    Screenshot of Customizable analytics and reports can be shared across the organization - additional read license requiredScreenshot of Centrally manage automated testing and environments, as well as schedule and or kickoff automated testing with any open source or proprietary toolScreenshot of qTest allows for true test case sharing across teams and projects to help standardize and scale knowledge and best practicesScreenshot of qTest integrates in real-time with Jira for full traceability to requirements during Agile test and developmentScreenshot of Build custom, event-driven workflows with any third-party solution, including ChatOps tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams, to streamline testing and drive collaborationScreenshot of Tricentis qTest comes with over 60 out-of-the-box metrics, with drag-and-drop capabilities to build custom dashboards