camos CPQ vs. PandaDoc
camos CPQ vs. PandaDoc
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() camos CPQ | N/A | camos CPQ is a configuration, pricing, and quoting software solution with features such as role-bsaed access right and authorisation processes, simultaneous processing of comprehensive quotes across locations, and ready-to-deliver quotation documents in multiple languages. | N/A | |
PandaDoc | N/A | PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs. | $35 per month per seat |
| camos CPQ | PandaDoc | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | PandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. Up to a 46% discount for annual pricing. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| camos CPQ | PandaDoc |
|---|
| camos CPQ | PandaDoc | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ |
|
| camos CPQ | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | QuoteWerks Score 9.9 out of 10 | Foxit eSign Score 9.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | QuoteWerks Score 9.9 out of 10 | MSB Docs Score 9.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SAP Sales Cloud Score 8.5 out of 10 | DocuSign Score 8.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| camos CPQ | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 (1 ratings) | 8.7 (329 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (18 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | 8.3 (23 ratings) |
| Availability | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (4 ratings) |
| Performance | - (0 ratings) | 9.6 (21 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 6.1 (23 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 6.3 (4 ratings) |
| Configurability | - (0 ratings) | 2.8 (3 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | 9.0 (20 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | - (0 ratings) | 8.6 (4 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | - (0 ratings) | 9.7 (20 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | - (0 ratings) | 6.7 (4 ratings) |
| camos CPQ | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() camos
| PandaDoc
|
| Pros | ![]() camos No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Cons | ![]() camos No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() camos No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Usability | ![]() camos No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Reliability and Availability | ![]() camos No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Performance | ![]() camos No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Support Rating | ![]() camos No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]() camos No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() camos
| PandaDoc
|
| Scalability | ![]() camos No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() camos No answers on this topic | PandaDoc
|
| ScreenShots | PandaDoc Screenshots |







