Campaigner is an email marketing solution built by marketers that is designed to help small, medium and large businesses strengthen customer relationships and drive sales. Campaigner advanced features include A/B split testing, workflows, API integration, segmentation, detailed reporting, and responsive design, to provide corporate-level senders with the functionality that they need to effectively track and monitor email marketing campaigns.
$14
per month
Ortto
Score9 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Ortto is presented as a product-led growth engine that helps businesses acquire and retain customers. Since 2015, Ortto has supported over 10,000 companies with their software. Ortto allows online businesses to unify their customer data with their CDP, segment key audiences across the customer lifecycle; activate these audiences with personalized, omnichannel experiences, and analyze their business for growth with a suite of BI tools. The vendor states teams at Microsoft, Bltly, Typeform,…
$199
per month month-to-month commitment with 10,000 contacts
Pricing
Campaigner
Ortto
Editions & Modules
Essentials
$14
per month
Advanced
$35
per month
Starter
$199
per month month-to-month commitment with 5,000 contacts
Professional
$599
per month month-to-month commitment with 10,000 contacts
Enterprise
Custom
per month annual commitment, paid monthly with 10,000 contacts
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Campaigner
Ortto
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
10% discount for quarterly billing. 15% discount for annual billing.
More Pricing Information
Features
Campaigner
Ortto
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Campaigner and Ortto
Feature
Campaigner
6.3
4 Ratings
24% below category average
Ortto
9.0
11 Ratings
15% above category average
WYSIWYG email editor
8.04 Ratings
8.911 Ratings
Dynamic content
4.04 Ratings
8.98 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
4.04 Ratings
8.98 Ratings
Landing pages
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
A/B testing
3.03 Ratings
8.98 Ratings
Mobile optimization
7.04 Ratings
8.910 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
6.04 Ratings
9.911 Ratings
List management
8.04 Ratings
8.911 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
9.02 Ratings
8.911 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Campaigner and Ortto
Feature
Campaigner
4.7
4 Ratings
47% below category average
Ortto
8.9
12 Ratings
17% above category average
Dashboards
5.01 Ratings
8.912 Ratings
Standard reports
8.04 Ratings
8.912 Ratings
Custom reports
1.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Campaigner and Ortto
Feature
Campaigner
-
Ratings
Ortto
9.2
11 Ratings
15% above category average
Lead nurturing automation
00 Ratings
9.911 Ratings
Data quality management
00 Ratings
8.910 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
00 Ratings
8.99 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Campaigner and Ortto
Feature
Campaigner
-
Ratings
Ortto
8.9
9 Ratings
16% above category average
Event/webinar marketing
00 Ratings
8.99 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Campaigner and Ortto
Feature
Campaigner
-
Ratings
Ortto
8.9
8 Ratings
16% above category average
Social profile integration
00 Ratings
8.98 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Campaigner and Ortto
Workflow feature makes this best suited for those who want to send a series of emails over time based on contact attributes and behavior. Ability to add custom fields and define segments makes this tool valuable for very targeted email campaigns. Lack of communication about releases and poor technical support means your users will need to be fairly skilled in critical thinking and more technical than average. Our knowledge of system came from lots of trial and error.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Autopilot has a friendly and bright appeal offering a code-free automation experience that makes it easy to build complex automated workflows. Anyone can start creating workflows using the drag-and-drop builder even without technical knowledge. Teams utilize the notes and graphics feature to collaborate on automation workflows providing a much easier way to understand workflows created by someone else.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Number 1, is it's ease of use. We have not run into any problems where someone finds Campaigner difficult to use and this comes in handy every day. The more people that know how to use it the better because it reduces stress/buildup on others.
We love the reporting system here. We use the clicks and opens to follow up with people all the time so to have all that detailed information is very beneficial.
Customization is great. You can really make all your emails look exactly like they're pictured in your head.
Very easy to use automation builder with many great options and integrations. Lets us tailor incredibly precise campaigns through use of Autopilot's own features, plus its tight integrations with data from sources like Segment.
Easy and powerful email editing and creation built-in. No need for email template coding.
Autopilot allows marketers to have full control and implement new web forms to capture leads quickly with its automatic form detection. No need to save custom form data to our own backend saves our development team time.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Campaigner is just too bare-bones. When we first started using Campaigner close to a decade ago it was perfect for what it was. But nowadays Campaigner is missing several features that their competitors offer like exit intent and cart abandonment emails.
Campaigner has an astonishingly bad unsubscribe option. We have had many customers complain to us over the years that when they try to unsubscribe through the emails Campaigner sends, their unsubscribe does not go through.
Hard to change account settings such as changing our subscription plan. We had to call and were told to wait 24 hours just to make a small change to our account.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Limited Design Customization: If you're an experienced marketer and are used to the unlimited customization capabilities of larger platforms (or coding your own templates), you might find Autopilot's options to be limiting. It's great for a beginner user who shouldn't be encumbered with those options, but I could see if being frustrating for others.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I can't see us not renewing unless we find something better. This is highly unlikely because there was a thorough research done for use to chose the best marketing client and it always came back to campaigner.
Great features but awful tech support experiences over five years of use. Some releases broke our workflows and Campaigner could never explain why. Our initial plan provided a designed client support contact. This individual changed frequently without notice and at one point they decided our plan no longer included a designated contact. Of course this was never communicated to us until we tried to reach out to the person. If you are tech savy this system might be for you but you'll be on your own.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Everything takes a minimum of 24 hours to solve and after being with campaigner for several years we were just told for the first time we have an account rep which we never even spoke to.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
MailChimp is far more customizable and User-Friendly, although Campaigner gets the job done. Campaigner could benefit from a design upgrade to bring their look into the modern realm. The drag and drop features and email customization of MailChimp, Campaigner is lacking. However, MailChimp is pricier. So you are definitely getting what you pay for.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
How would I say this, for me Autopilot is a whole other tool then the other MA tools I use. Most other MA tools focus on a lot of options and things you can do with it. But Autopilot seems to mainly focus on the visual builder to make automations, and they do that really well! The other tools are also great but more a "complete package solution" with a lot of options. And that can be overwhelming. So if you want a great easy-to-use workflow/automation builder and less of all the other options Autopilot is a great start.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Not sure. I cannot put a $ on it for ROI as I was the administrator and not part of the team that procured it. Time-wise I would say I spent less time using it than I previously had used in CloudPortal Services Manager.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info