CATS is a web-based recruiting software. Users can manage the entire recruiting process including custom job applications, posting jobs, resume parsing, custom recruitment workflows, and generating customized reports. Pricing is tiered per user, per month.
$69
per month
OrangeHRM
Score6.1 out of 10
N/A
The OrangeHRM platform is a cloud-based HR platform with features for employee management, PTO/leave, recruitment and time tracking. It is available free and open-source, or commercially with advanced features for employee training and career development.
N/A
Pricing
CATS ATS
OrangeHRM
Editions & Modules
Annual Pro Plan
$69
per user, per month
Monthly Pro Plan
$99
per user, per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CATS ATS
OrangeHRM
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Please visit the CATS pricing page to compare plans and features
—
More Pricing Information
Features
CATS ATS
OrangeHRM
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of CATS Applicant Tracking System and OrangeHRM
Feature
CATS Applicant Tracking System
8.2
19 Ratings
4% above category average
OrangeHRM
9.3
2 Ratings
16% above category average
Job Requisition Management
9.517 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Company Website Posting
9.517 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
8.617 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
10.017 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Customized Application Form
9.518 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
8.119 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
4.618 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Candidate Search
6.219 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
7.619 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Collaboration
8.612 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
8.615 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
9.519 Ratings
00 Ratings
User Permissions
8.517 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
9.517 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Reporting
4.718 Ratings
00 Ratings
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of CATS Applicant Tracking System and OrangeHRM
Feature
CATS Applicant Tracking System
-
Ratings
OrangeHRM
9.0
2 Ratings
9% above category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of CATS Applicant Tracking System and OrangeHRM
Feature
CATS Applicant Tracking System
-
Ratings
OrangeHRM
9.9
1 Ratings
19% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of CATS Applicant Tracking System and OrangeHRM
Feature
CATS Applicant Tracking System
-
Ratings
OrangeHRM
9.0
2 Ratings
9% above category average
Approval workflow
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Balance details
00 Ratings
9.52 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of CATS Applicant Tracking System and OrangeHRM
Feature
CATS Applicant Tracking System
-
Ratings
OrangeHRM
9.2
2 Ratings
11% above category average
View and generate pay and benefit information
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Update personal information
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
View company policy documentation
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Employee recognition
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
View job history
00 Ratings
9.52 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of CATS Applicant Tracking System and OrangeHRM
Feature
CATS Applicant Tracking System
-
Ratings
OrangeHRM
10.0
1 Ratings
22% above category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of CATS Applicant Tracking System and OrangeHRM
Feature
CATS Applicant Tracking System
-
Ratings
OrangeHRM
9.0
2 Ratings
17% above category average
Report builder
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Pre-built reports
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of CATS Applicant Tracking System and OrangeHRM
Feature
CATS Applicant Tracking System
-
Ratings
OrangeHRM
8.2
2 Ratings
2% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of CATS Applicant Tracking System and OrangeHRM
Feature
CATS Applicant Tracking System
-
Ratings
OrangeHRM
10.0
1 Ratings
21% above category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of CATS Applicant Tracking System and OrangeHRM
Feature
CATS Applicant Tracking System
-
Ratings
OrangeHRM
9.1
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
8.52 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of CATS Applicant Tracking System and OrangeHRM
It has a great parsing feature and the extension is very helpful. Many ATS systems do not support parsing within LinkedIn...this one does. I was sad to see this option go when we finally transitioned. I would almost keep CATS just for the LinkedIn parsing if I knew I could easily get the information OUT of the system once it was there. A good API/webhook would be great, but sadly the API connections don't work well. Our firm also works with companies with multiple sites all across the US. There was never a way to "nest" a location with a parent company. Because of this, being able to research or report on a true client relationship was not possible. It was a very manual process.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
According to me, OrangeHRM is best suited for small to medium-sized organizations for [the] management of their employee's records and attendance/leave management. Also, [the] applicant tracking system is [a] very useful feature of this application. OrangeHRM needs to add more features in order to cater requirements of a large-scale organization. Payroll management, learning management, and grievance handling features should be added or improved.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I would like to see either an integration with a robust reporting tool that would allow me to design my own custom reports with a data export or more built-in reporting options.
Mobile app is currently mostly just a look-up tool. I would like it to have the ability to do more - add tasks, update pipelines, etc.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Our company has been using it and enjoying the benefits for a few years now. Its a perfect system for our end goal of finding the best candidate effectively and being able to track and write reports on our progress.
I've had mixed results with asking for support. Sometimes they gave a quick answer and sometimes my emails were never responded to. Some responses were a single word.
This is an incredibly easy system to implement. There is no hardware or software required, it's entirely SaaS based. Compared to other systems I've implemented, it's breathtaking. Customization can all be done directly in the tool, there is no need for any involvement of consultants and most of the information you cannot figure out intuitively is covered in the knowledge base
We used to use Sendouts (prior to it being acquired by Bullhorn) - and it wasn't browser based like CATS so instead of being able to access it from a home computer, laptop, mobile phone, etc. you could only use it on the computer with the software uploaded - which is a hindrance. It also wasn't as customizable as CATS. We picked CATS because it the price was right, it was browser-based, had email-integration, and integrates with social media and job posting services to share your jobs with the public.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We went from Excel spreadsheets to using CATS so honestly anything would be an improvement. But CATS has saved tremendous time on an on-going basis in terms of managing the career portal automatically.
Being able to log email conversations with the click of a button from Outlook right into CATS has been a time-saver and also has helped numerous times in providing better follow-through to candidates and providing better tracking of candidate interactions and what they have previously said (or not).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info