Certinia FM Cloud automates financial management on the Salesforce platform. The customer-centric software includes a general ledger, automated billing processes, and financial intelligence.
N/A
Infor VISUAL
Score7.2 out of 10
N/A
Infor VISUAL is an ERP software focused on manufacturing companies with business intelligence, planning and scheduling, and pricing, quoting, and estimating capabilities, among others.
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Score5.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family.
This product was acquired from Solomon 2000.
The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.
N/A
Pricing
Certinia FM Cloud
Infor VISUAL
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Certinia FM Cloud
Infor VISUAL
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Free Trial
No
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
Certinia Professional Services Cloud software follows a subscription-based pricing model that is typically structured according to the number of users and the level of features required. The software’s pricing may vary depending on the organization’s size and needs, with options to select modules or add-ons for additional functionality. Specific pricing details may require a consultation or quote from Certinia for tailored solutions.
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Certinia FM Cloud
Infor VISUAL
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Considered Multiple Products
Certinia
Verified User
Chose Certinia FM Cloud
FFA is built on the Salesforce platform, giving us one source of data for our KPIs. Unlike Dynamics, FFA allows us to create custom reports and dashboards through which we can share financial results. We were able to better automate and streamline accounts payable using FFA. …
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Infor
No answer on this topic
Microsoft
No answer on this topic
Key User Insights
Would buy again
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Delivers good value for the price
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Happy with the feature set
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Lived up to sales and marketing promises
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Implementation went as expected
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Features
Certinia FM Cloud
Infor VISUAL
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
2 Ratings
11% above category average
Infor VISUAL
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
2 Ratings
12% above category average
Pay calculation
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.62 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Certinia FM Cloud and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
4 Ratings
11% above category average
Infor VISUAL
1.0
1 Ratings
153% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
6 Ratings
23% below category average
API for custom integration
8.84 Ratings
1.01 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Certinia FM Cloud and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.4
5 Ratings
0% below category average
Infor VISUAL
9.0
1 Ratings
6% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.7
10 Ratings
3% above category average
Single sign-on capability
8.65 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
7.49 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.15 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
10.09 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Certinia FM Cloud and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
5 Ratings
5% above category average
Infor VISUAL
4.0
3 Ratings
61% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.0
10 Ratings
6% above category average
Dashboards
8.45 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Standard reports
6.55 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
Custom reports
8.85 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Certinia FM Cloud and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
7.9
6 Ratings
2% above category average
Infor VISUAL
7.4
3 Ratings
4% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.1
11 Ratings
8% below category average
Accounts payable
8.05 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
6.011 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.14 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
6.08 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.01 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
7.01 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
6.63 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.33 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
7.43 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Standardized Processes
8.73 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
10.0
3 Ratings
22% above category average
Infor VISUAL
8.0
4 Ratings
0% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
6 Ratings
33% below category average
Inventory tracking
10.03 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
5.06 Ratings
Automatic reordering
10.03 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
10.03 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.1
2 Ratings
2% above category average
Infor VISUAL
9.7
4 Ratings
20% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.2
4 Ratings
25% below category average
Pricing
8.02 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
Order entry
8.02 Ratings
10.03 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
Credit card processing
8.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.02 Ratings
10.04 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Certinia FM Cloud and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.7
1 Ratings
14% above category average
Infor VISUAL
8.6
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
4 Ratings
28% below category average
Travel & Expense Management
10.01 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
7.01 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
6.32 Ratings
Billing Management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
9.3
1 Ratings
20% above category average
Infor VISUAL
7.2
1 Ratings
5% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
3 Ratings
47% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
Project Costing
9.01 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
6.33 Ratings
Cost Capture
10.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
2.12 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
8.2
1 Ratings
15% above category average
Infor VISUAL
3.0
1 Ratings
81% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Certinia FM Cloud and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
3.2
2 Ratings
80% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
22% below category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
2.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Certinia FM Cloud and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
2.0
1 Ratings
114% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
20% below category average
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
Feature
Certinia FM Cloud
-
Ratings
Infor VISUAL
2.0
1 Ratings
115% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Product Master Data Management
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Certinia FM Cloud and Infor VISUAL and Microsoft Dynamics SL
For accounting systems, users and/or evaluators often want to see some type of matrix or "heads up" comparisons of specific features and functionality of a system in key areas such as: 1) General Ledger 2) Order to Cash cycle 3) Purchase to Pay cycle 4) Cash management 5) Inventory and/or Cost Accounting (Projects/Jobs, etc) 6) Revenue Recognition 7) Fixed Assets management 8) Budgets 9) Tax 10) Reports and Analysis It would be great if this kind of matrix existed to be filled in by reviewers so that others could benefit from their perspectives about the applications and how they address or handle the specific features/functionality. With respect to FinancialForce, the company has found that nearly all the key features it needed were available from the application.
I struggle to identify a scenario where VISUAL is an appropriate solution. We used VISUAL because it was a legacy system and the cost/complexity of changeover seemed daunting. The user interface is poor as is the interconnectedness of the various screens and menus. This might be an acceptable piece of software for a continuous manufacturing environment with little variation of basic design, but we have had to write multiple add-on macros in order to get VISUAL to work effectively for us.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Infor Visual has a standard way of addressing business operations: sales orders, invoicing, reporting. It is easy to train operators used to using a manual or other ERP system.
Material control is easy for production runs, R&D material lists and repairs. The process of receiving, issuing and returning material to inventory is facilitated by standard interfaces that are easily learned by material control operators.
Engineering changes to bills of material are facilitated by the "engineering Master" flexible editing capability. The version control for the BOM's can be as detailed or vague as the process designed dictates. One item of a BOM or the entire BOM can be changed quickly and approved for production that day.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Since SalesForce was not made with accounting in mind, building FinancialForce as a module on top of SalesForce gives problems because the overarching architect of SalesForce cannot facilitate all the accounting requirements.
The FinancialForce integration team was not very good, and did not help us set up our FinancialForce very well. Their customer support is also lacking and takes a long time to respond and troubleshoot our problems.
FinancialForce doesn't actually build financial statement reports. We were only able to run a trial balance, and we had to build the statements ourselves in Excel.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
VTA has been extremely unreliable. I would not recommend it. It is not customizable at all. There is no logical way to handle shift differentials which is a huge issue with a company that runs 24/7.
If you do not have a schedule set up, they cannot clock in. This poses a problem for anyone that gets called in on a shift they don't normally work on.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The company has now converted its legacy, "home grown" operations system and built it on the force.com platform, and the integration between it and FinancialForce is deeply entrenched. No other application would be able to replicate this functionality, and the company will be able to scale and leverage the force.com platform as it grows.
Good Technical and Customer Support during and after implementation tasks. Good Project Plan and Management support for implementation and post implementation. Financial functionality could be more comprehensive particularly with Budgeting and Cash Management. Inventory Management capability was adequate but could be more comprehensive as well. "Out of the Box" functionality was adequate but requested add-ons and enhancements seemed to be a bit pricey.
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Change management is always an issue, but the evidence of the application's usability is that both long-time employees (used to the legacy systems for many years) and newer employees have been able to learn the system and improve their business processes.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Unless the internet is completely unavailable - which has not happened yet - the application is always accessible. Since FinancialForce is built on the force.com platform, it's uptime is tied to Salesforce security and system performance standards
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The response time for FinancialForce is exemplary. Immediate acknowledgement of the support request by automatically logging a case/ticket on the provider side, then less than 24-hour follow up by a support team member with specific questions, information or resolution for the issue.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Through its Xtra login website available to its customers, FinancialForce offers a complete set of online, video tutorials, training and documentation. Each tutorial is "bite-sized", meaning it imparts instructional, step-by-step information in 2-3 minute narrated videos. For a particular cycle or process, like invoices to payments for example, each tutorial builds on the last so that the user can get a complete picture of the steps and process in less than 10 minutes.
The company decided to run parallel for three months in order to soften the impact of the change from the legacy "system" - which users had been interfacing with for over a decade - to FinancialForce. While not recommended, this did provide time for the in-house "super user" team of 2 people to become completely familiar with the application, and thus provide hands-on training and be a resource for the users who would be processing the daily accounting transactions.
Could have used more hands-on approach. There are multiple webinars and information sessions but until you actually use the system, these are not very helpful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
FinancialForce Subscription & Usage Billing has more features, more useability, and manages higher numbers of customers. The systems I have used in the past are easier to navigate but couldn't handle this number of customers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We unfortunately did not evaluate any other ERP software. VISUAL was a legacy system and we determined that changing systems would be too difficult, and not cost effective. We reached out to our local VISUAL rep who knew how the software functioned, but not how to apply it more appropriately to our business model, so we continued on with what we had rather than looking elsewhere.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info