Cisco Duo vs. IBM Cloud App ID

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco Duo
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Duo is a two-factor authentication system (2FA), acquired by Cisco in October 2018. It provides single sign-on (SSO) and endpoint visibility, as well as access controls and policy controlled adaptive authentication.
$3
per month per user
IBM Cloud App ID
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
IBM Cloud App ID helps developers who are not security experts to add authentication to their apps, and protect their APIs and app back-ends running on IBM Cloud. Developers can add a variety of login-in types: Email or username and password Enterprise Social App ID includes a cloud user repository to on-board new users, so they can log-in with email/username & passwords, with pre-built self-service workflows (password reset, email validation etc.)…N/A
Pricing
Cisco DuoIBM Cloud App ID
Editions & Modules
Duo Essentials
$3
per month per user
Duo Advantage
$6
per month per user
Duo Premier
$9
per month per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco DuoIBM Cloud App ID
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco DuoIBM Cloud App ID
Considered Both Products
Cisco Duo
Chose Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo was much easier to setup and was trusted more than JAMF. I think having a familiar name like Cisco people were more willing to download than the application Jamf had
Chose Cisco Duo
Cisco is a name brand that guarantees their products
Chose Cisco Duo
Microsoft Authenticator, Google Authenticator, similar but less support on devices and cell
Chose Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo is more responsive and quicker that google authenticator
Chose Cisco Duo
When we evaluated Microsoft MFA vs Cisco Duo, we found that Cisco Duo had more integrations into systems that we were supporting. We also found that Cisco Duo could support a more types of authenticators (Yubikeys, verified push to an app, OTP tokens such as d100, etc). The …
Chose Cisco Duo
Easier to distribute, manage, and troubleshoot.
Chose Cisco Duo
Cisco ASA 5500-X with FirePOWER Services
Chose Cisco Duo
Cisco Duo exceeds the WatchGaurd AuthPoint product on every metric. Its easier to implement. More flexible in how its applied. And it allows much more features and granularity in how it can control access
Chose Cisco Duo
Ultimately we ended up going with Cisco Duo because we are a Cisco shop. All of our networking infrastructure, our phones, our wireless environment is Cisco based. It made logical sense to stay with a product that we already have a line of support with. With a smaller …
Chose Cisco Duo
We did look at Okta for our 2FA solution and while it did support end user 2FA, Okta did not have the feature set that Cisco Duo was offering. One of our requirements was 2FA support for custom applications. Cisco Duo had the solution and support staff to help us roll that out.
Chose Cisco Duo
Better brand awareness, compatibility.
Chose Cisco Duo
Duo is the only solution we considered after conducting our research. There is nothing better.
Chose Cisco Duo
None, we are happy with offering Cisco Duo
IBM Cloud App ID
Chose IBM Cloud App ID
In my opinion, the IBM Cloud App ID are far from, thus, requires a lot of improvement compare to these matured, has long years of experiences in offering similar application of purpose. The IBM has a lot of room to improve more so that their client would definitely choose their …
Chose IBM Cloud App ID
The reputation of IBM Cloud App ID across the market and pricing solution for our large organization was the main driving factor. Also, user documentation and customer support were an add on.
Chose IBM Cloud App ID
We also integrated some parts of our solution with Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign-On and Auth0.
Chose IBM Cloud App ID
IBM Cloud App ID is our first supplier when it comes to app authentication. IBM is a very known provider and we didn't have to research its trustworthiness or hesitate [on] our purchase decision. Even though it can be a bit expensive, efficiency is our top priority.
Chose IBM Cloud App ID
Both the software have different use cases, like IBM Cloud App ID, which will be more suitable for internal websites and apps or specific event website authentications, Auth0 can be suitable for consumer websites, e-commerce sites, where social media login is preferred more by …
Chose IBM Cloud App ID
I was building my application’s back end on IBM Cloud Functions, so naturally I had to use App ID. Because of the seamless integration between App ID and Cloud Functions, I can create protected API endpoints for my Single Page Application (SPA) and not have to write middleware …
Chose IBM Cloud App ID
Most of our services are in IBM Cloud. IBM APP ID offers a streamline integration to most of them.
Chose IBM Cloud App ID
IBM Cloud App ID was selected because a free tier instance was available so we could experiment with it right away.
Chose IBM Cloud App ID
The features that IBM App ID includes are incredibly beneficial to the developer process in terms of simplicity and security. I have found using this app a prominent staple in app development and plan to use it furthermore.
Chose IBM Cloud App ID
We have built our own custom solution.
Chose IBM Cloud App ID
I’m not that familiar with the competition and the other products we evaluated.
Features
Cisco DuoIBM Cloud App ID
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Product A and Product B
Cisco Duo
-
Ratings
IBM Cloud App ID
7.5
Ratings
9% below category average
ID-Management Access Control00 Ratings6.60 Ratings
ID Management Single-Sign On (SSO)00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication00 Ratings8.20 Ratings
Password Management00 Ratings8.00 Ratings
Account Provisioning and De-provisioning00 Ratings7.70 Ratings
ID Management Workflow Automation00 Ratings7.10 Ratings
ID Risk Management00 Ratings6.80 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cisco DuoIBM Cloud App ID
Small Businesses
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.0 out of 10
Dashlane Password Manager
Dashlane Password Manager
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
WatchGuard AuthPoint
WatchGuard AuthPoint
Score 9.0 out of 10
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra ID
Score 8.8 out of 10
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
RSA Access Manager (Discontinued)
Score 10.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco DuoIBM Cloud App ID
Likelihood to Recommend
9.4
(0 ratings)
8.3
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
9.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
9.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
9.9
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
9.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
10.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco DuoIBM Cloud App ID
Likelihood to Recommend
For secure access to apps and business data, I recommend Cisco Duo. It offers SSO, MFA, and Passwordless access, ensuring teams can securely access business data. It is easy to customize and comes with top-tier security features. It protects business data, apps, and users.
Read full review
Whenever you need to provide Security Provider functionality for a web based application it is well suited. You can also integrate with other directory services (e.g. SAML, Facebook, Google), but not so easily with other Auth0 based services. The customization of the login page is very intuitive, but does not allow much customisation. using the integrated Cloud Directory, you do not need to integrate with existing security providers and you can build up your own user base - including Multi-Factor Authentication settings and password policies.
Read full review
Pros
  • We use Cisco Duo with different type of device and application, but we never face any difficulties to integrate Cisco Duo with any of them.
  • We integrated Cisco Duo with some of our active directory and some of the OS are quite old but Cisco Duo works totally fine with them.
  • The end user application is very easy to use. We never had any complain from non tech team members of having trouble of using Cisco Duo.
  • There are several authentication methods available rather than passcode. I personally like the push notification which is always on time and quite fast.
Read full review
  • Uses OIDC/OAuth, so the protocols for accessing user info and token management is familiar
  • Clear pricing model
  • API binds nicely with IBM Cloud Functions
  • Billed as part of our IBM Cloud, along with our other services
  • Front-end SDK for Vue, works well
Read full review
Cons
  • Should have device to device connection ability whereas internet is not met.
  • Changes of device can be sorted and easily made using a second email address or any other identification method.
  • Troubleshooting should be easy to sort out. One time, a Duo admin deleted the authentication group, and some employees were not getting push notifications. It was very hard to find out the cause. Duo should have some troubleshooting finder.
  • Sometimes push notifications are delayed, and the code does not work. At that time, we need to enroll the device again. Not sure why it happens. Duo should give reasons for the error.
Read full review
  • Pricing can be heavy on small organizations.
  • User interface updates could be timely.
  • Cloud services hangs at times, but very rarely.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
There are a lot of competing solutions on the market; however, Duo "just works", and there is little to no learning curve for the new members to be acclimated to it. As long as that continues I see it as the preferred option moving forward
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
La interfaz es intuitiva y fácil de navegar, lo que permite a los usuarios administrar sus dispositivos y acceder a las políticas sin problemas. La integración con las aplicaciones SSO y SaaS facilita aún más el proceso de acceso, mejorando la experiencia del usuario.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
In the last 5+ years we've been using Duo, there may have been 1 outage that impacted us. We do receive periodic notifications of issues but, for the most part, they impact carriers or functionality that we either don't use, or do not care about.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
We do not see any degradation of performance of the protected applications. There are occasional lags in receiving the push but no show stooppers.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I have not needed direct support for Cisco Secure Access by Duo as I have not had a problem with it, but I have full confidence that the support is outstanding. It is now a core component of the corporate technology stack - a problem would mean a serious degradation in the ability of the company to function.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
There was no in person training but checking the box was the only way I could complete all of the questions.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Online Training
This was not organized training but the videos that Duo provides to teach you how to install a particular integration are top notch.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Documentation could have been better. I had to piece together different KB/admin guides to make certain things work and I also had to use third-party guides to get bits of information that were missing from Cisco Duo documentation. Support was also engaged multiple times to figure out an issue and after some back and forth it was usually determined that the information I needed was hidden somewhere else and had no direct correlation with the document that was linked from the platform.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Ultimately we ended up going with Cisco Duo because we are a Cisco shop. All of our networking infrastructure, our phones, our wireless environment is Cisco based. It made logical sense to stay with a product that we already have a line of support with. With a smaller support / tech group we depend on outside Cisco support. That support is already here for us, so we stayed with a Cisco product.
Read full review
Both the software have different use cases, like IBM Cloud App ID, which will be more suitable for internal websites and apps or specific event website authentications, Auth0 can be suitable for consumer websites, e-commerce sites, where social media login is preferred more by the users. Both have their own capabilities so can be chosen according to their needs.
Read full review
Scalability
So far, the only limits we've encountered were tied to our imagination. Duo's strong list of supported integrations is amazing.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Cisco Duo has saved us from automated attacks on VPN. We had an instance is 2024 where our VPN was being brute force attacked, and we had several users' weak passwords compromised; however the VPN security groups, and the MFA kept the attacks from gaining access. We've since replaced our firewall with capabilities for limitations on country access for VPN, and beefed up our password complexity settings,
Read full review
  • This has had a positive impact on security while developing our company's first major application.
  • It has impacted our development process heavily by making authentication simpler than ever.
  • It has helped reduce time in our development process by having easy integration and useful guides.
Read full review
ScreenShots