TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Clay

    Score9.3 out of 10
    N/AClay is a GTM enrichment product that combines access to 100+ data sources and AI agents with automated workflows to build any growth use case. Companies use it for tasks like recurring CRM enrichment to targeted outreach.

    $149

    per month 2000 credits per month

    Forcepoint DLP

    Score8.5 out of 10
    N/AForcepoint Data Loss Prevention (DLP) protects sensitive data everywhere it resides and moves, across endpoints, cloud apps, web, email, and on-premises environments. It delivers unified policy management and centralized control from a single console.N/A
    Pricing
    ClayForcepoint DLP
    Editions & Modules
    Starter
    $149
    per month 2000 credits per month
    Explorer
    $349
    per month 10,000 credits per month
    Pro
    $800
    per month 50,000 credits per month
    Enterprise
    Custom Pricing
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ClayForcepoint DLP
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ClayForcepoint DLP
    Considered Both Products
    Clay Labs Inc. (dba Clay)
    No answer on this topic
    Forcepoint
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    102 Answers
    87%
    Would buy again
    20 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    98%
    Delivers good value for the price
    94 Answers
    87%
    Delivers good value for the price
    20 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    99%
    Happy with the feature set
    101 Answers
    91%
    Happy with the feature set
    21 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    92 Answers
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    12 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    87 Answers
    85%
    Implementation went as expected
    17 Answers
    Features
    ClayForcepoint DLP
    Prospecting
    Comparison of Prospecting features of Clay and Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
    Feature
    Clay
    8.2
    95 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
    -
    Ratings
    Advanced search8.393 Ratings00 Ratings
    Identification of new leads8.287 Ratings00 Ratings
    List quality7.986 Ratings00 Ratings
    List upload/download9.083 Ratings00 Ratings
    Ideal customer targeting8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Load time/data access7.688 Ratings00 Ratings
    Sales Intelligence Data Standards
    Comparison of Sales Intelligence Data Standards features of Clay and Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
    Feature
    Clay
    8.3
    86 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
    -
    Ratings
    Contact information8.186 Ratings00 Ratings
    Company information8.685 Ratings00 Ratings
    Industry information8.284 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification
    Comparison of Data Augmentation & Lead Qualification features of Clay and Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
    Feature
    Clay
    8.0
    84 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
    -
    Ratings
    Lead qualification process8.578 Ratings00 Ratings
    Smart lists and recommendations8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Salesforce integration8.266 Ratings00 Ratings
    Company/business profiles8.382 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data hygiene8.180 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automatic data refresh7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Filters and segmentation8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Sales Intelligence Email Features
    Comparison of Sales Intelligence Email Features features of Clay and Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
    Feature
    Clay
    7.9
    64 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
    -
    Ratings
    Sales email templates7.964 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Preparation
    Comparison of Data Preparation features of Clay and Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
    Feature
    Clay
    -
    Ratings
    Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention
    6.3
    2 Ratings
    26% below category average
    Data Encryption00 Ratings6.32 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ClayForcepoint DLP
    Small Businesses
    Owler
    Score9.7 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Crunchbase
    Score6.3 out of 10
    Symantec Data Loss Prevention
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Enterprises
    LinkedIn Sales Navigator for Gmail (discontinued)
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Symantec Data Loss Prevention
    Score7.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ClayForcepoint DLP
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.4
    (102 ratings)
    7.7
    (35 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.6
    (7 ratings)
    Usability
    7.8
    (102 ratings)
    7.7
    (3 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.3
    (12 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ClayForcepoint DLP
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Clay Labs Inc. (dba Clay)
    Sales automation is the most suited use case of Clay. You could generate GTM motions that are auto triggered by the signals, so you could actually create workflows that are triggered on specific signals. For example, a company gets new funding, you can reach out to the company within in a matter of minutes and you can track a lot of news that's happening on Google or using RSS feeds. You can patch that news into Clay and then manipulate that and get insights out of it. The second best use case is the data enrichment or data cleanup. Usually companies have CRMs with messy data. You can import that. Clay has native integrations with Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Marketo, and you can import those lists into Clay and then clean the data, enrich the data, and then push that forward, update the data in the CRMs. That's the second best use case that I use it for and would recommend it for.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Forcepoint
    -Where companies need to secure their attachment, which goes outside, means from their company to outside -Where companies need to ensure their client's personal information -Where companies need DLP. They need to look for Forcepoint only, as they have the upper hand over the rest of their competitors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Clay Labs Inc. (dba Clay)
    • Pros, I think there are a lot of pros, so I mentioned a couple of them already, so being able to use different data providers. I think being able to massage the data, I call it a data orchestration where I can get different points of inputs of data. I can throw everything in Clay and then I can make all the changes before I use them for campaigns, for email, for LinkedIn, for whatever reason I'm going to use my data, but it's really easy to enrich, it's really easy to do research. It's really easy to build agents that tie to each row in your dataset, like there are a lot of things that you could use it for that are huge pros.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Forcepoint
    • It has predominantly protected us from unauthorized parties and has provided us with better visibility and control over our data.
    • This software has also successfully prevented us from both malicious and accidental tasks, which are quite flexible actions when it comes to the violation of data loss prevention policies.
    • This product has been successful in improving compliance and even mitigating compliance violations, which further facilitated IT security.
    • I think there is room for improvement, as the user interface is slightly rough and difficult to adopt in the beginning. The software also hangs up at a few instances, which leads to some wasting of time and annoyance, but other than that, this software is good. The technical staff should work on the complexities for a better user experience.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Clay Labs Inc. (dba Clay)
    • A max column limit. I run into the column limit all the time and kind of have to figure out using multiple tables. Just bugs really. I mean if you start getting too crazy on it, I feel like takes a long time. You can't really identify that it's working or if it's not. So that kind of slows things down a little bit.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Forcepoint
    • Forcepoint technical support--specially for users who go with essential support--is challenging to get support on time. You need the ticket to be raised long beforehand to get support from TAC. However, in the case of enterprise support, its is not like this technical person will come on a priority basis.
    • However it comes with higher prices, especially for SMB, it is allowed to pay that amount for support only.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Clay Labs Inc. (dba Clay)
    The software is well suited in lead scoring and workflows management. Product reliability in customer outreach management and segmentation. The product is worth it from pricing to quality ecommerce services and automation of processes.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Forcepoint
    We have been fairly happy with the product and how it has worked. We have looked at other vendors for url filter and such and have not found one that meets our needs or does what we have been doing with Websense. The product has been fairly stable and we have only had a few issues in the past. We have all seen that it was one of the highest leaders from the Gartner Group Magic Quadrant for Web Gateways.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Clay Labs Inc. (dba Clay)
    I think it's actually before the launches today, I would say eight, but after they launch, what's the name of the product? I dunno if it was the web intent or the sculpture. 10, because I think that the sculpture was the missing part of plates till now.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Forcepoint
    For us, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention was difficult to administer, did not work well when it did work, was incredibly expensive for the feature set you get, and was difficult to uninstall when we moved on from the software. Once it was fully set up, it worked occasionally for us.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Clay Labs Inc. (dba Clay)
    No answers on this topic
    Forcepoint
    Support from Forcepoint has been lacking. When calling in with a high priority issue we rarely are able to work with a technician immediately. The queue waits are very long and when you get through there are no support engineers available and we need to wait for a call back for hours it seems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Clay Labs Inc. (dba Clay)
    So in a sense, there is a large community, and because of the community you also learn multiple workflows and how to use it better. You can kind of democratize or source knowledge more easily on how to use the product, and also transfer it so other people can use it more easily. So in a sense, that works.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Forcepoint
    User friendly solution that makes it easy to deploy and manage. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention very effective to protecting our valuable data on endpoints and where data lives like in the Cloud, server and on-premises disk drives and its valuable to just set policies once and start utilizing Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention solution.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Clay Labs Inc. (dba Clay)
    • Without Clay we would probably have our agency, but not with the level of sophistication we have right now or really one of our USP that we are certified by Clay. That's how we get a lot of inbound leads as well. So that of course leads to a very healthy ROI. If we look at inbound.
    • I think negative as terms in negative ROI, I think this is a nice one to touch on. Expectation management for tooling such as Clay is extremely difficult because people see a lot of stuff happening on LinkedIn from the top 1% of Clay experts and they look at us and "hey, we want the same thing," basically. That's quite a challenge. So that's really a good conversation to have with your potential client as well. Like, "Hey, I know, tell me what you've seen. We're going to see what we can do if that's reasonable or not." Set realistic expectations there and don't expect to go from zero to 100 within a very small time window. So that was something we had to learn. We had a lot of unrealistic expectations for what we can do. We can improve your business, but we can't do it with a factor of X or in a period of eight weeks.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Forcepoint
    • The exchange of financial documents with customers creates extreme risk as data loss could result in financial and reputation damage to the customer. The cost of deploying Forcepoint is fractions of pennies compared to the potential financial impact of data loss.
    • There is some administrative overhead associated as false positives are inevitable, requiring a manual review and a potential loss of productivity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots