Cloudera Data Science Workbench (CDSW) was an enterprise data science platform for collaborative development, experimentation, model training, deployment, and management on Cloudera data infrastructure. Cloudera Data Science Workbench has reached end of support. Cloudera states that its CDSW documentation is no longer updated.
N/A
IBM Watson Studio
Score10 out of 10
N/A
IBM Watson Studio enables users to build, run and manage AI models, and optimize decisions at scale across any cloud. IBM Watson Studio enables users can operationalize AI anywhere as part of IBM Cloud Pak® for Data, the IBM data and AI platform. The vendor states the solution simplifies AI lifecycle management and accelerates time to value with an open, flexible multicloud architecture.
N/A
OpenText Magellan
Score9 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Magellan Analytics Suite leverages a comprehensive set of data analytics software to identify patterns, relationships and trends through data visualizations and interactive dashboards.
consultant in Information Technology at Reply (Online Media, 5001-10,000 employees)
Chose IBM Watson Studio
IBM DSx is more comprehensive and easy to use, IBM Data science experience has many connectors to the data source and guarantees the portability with your old projects.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Verified User
Chose IBM Watson Studio
DSX is a good challenger for Databricks and co. It is Enterprise ready and well integrated.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued) and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued)
7.5
2 Ratings
11% below category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.1
22 Ratings
3% below category average
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Connect to Multiple Data Sources
7.02 Ratings
8.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Extend Existing Data Sources
8.02 Ratings
8.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic Data Format Detection
7.02 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
MDM Integration
8.02 Ratings
6.414 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Exploration
Comparison of Data Exploration features of Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued) and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued)
7.6
2 Ratings
10% below category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
10.0
22 Ratings
17% above category average
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Visualization
7.12 Ratings
10.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interactive Data Analysis
8.02 Ratings
10.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Preparation
Comparison of Data Preparation features of Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued) and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued)
7.8
2 Ratings
5% below category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
22 Ratings
15% above category average
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment
7.02 Ratings
10.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Transformations
8.02 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Encryption
8.02 Ratings
8.020 Ratings
00 Ratings
Built-in Processors
8.02 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform Data Modeling
Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued) and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued)
7.6
2 Ratings
11% below category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
9.5
22 Ratings
12% above category average
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools
8.02 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated Machine Learning
7.01 Ratings
10.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Single platform for multiple model development
7.12 Ratings
10.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-Service Model Delivery
8.12 Ratings
8.020 Ratings
00 Ratings
Model Deployment
Comparison of Model Deployment features of Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued) and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued)
8.0
2 Ratings
6% below category average
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
8.0
22 Ratings
6% below category average
OpenText Magellan
-
Ratings
Flexible Model Publishing Options
8.12 Ratings
9.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security, Governance, and Cost Controls
7.82 Ratings
7.022 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued) and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued)
-
Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
7.0
2 Ratings
15% below category average
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued) and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued)
-
Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
8.3
3 Ratings
4% above category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued) and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued)
-
Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
8.3
2 Ratings
1% above category average
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued) and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data and OpenText Magellan
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued) and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data and OpenText Magellan
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued) and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data and OpenText Magellan
Feature
Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued)
-
Ratings
IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data
-
Ratings
OpenText Magellan
7.0
2 Ratings
10% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding
Comparison of Application Program Interfaces (APIs) / Embedding features of Cloudera Data Science Workbench (discontinued) and IBM Watson Studio on Cloud Pak for Data and OpenText Magellan
Organizations which already implemented on-premise Hadoop based Cloudera Data Platform (CDH) for their Big Data warehouse architecture will definitely get more value from seamless integration of Cloudera Data Science Workbench (CDSW) with their existing CDH Platform. However, for organizations with hybrid (cloud and on-premise) data platform without prior implementation of CDH, implementing CDSW can be a challenge technically and financially.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It has a lot of features that are good for teams working on large-scale projects and continuously developing and reiterating their data project models. Really helpful when dealing with large data. It is a kind of one-stop solution for all data science tasks like visualization, cleaning, analyzing data, and developing models but small teams might find a lot of features unuseful.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
If you do not have a large budget and are a large organization, I would steer clear of Actuate. If you are looking to do very complex washboarding, I would not use them. Your developers have to be very skilled to work with this. Plan to bring in consultants if necessary to help your process. Adhoc reporting is weak. If your pricing is user based and you expand, this could be very expensive.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I am no longer working for the company that was using Actuate but I believe they would continue to use it because the stitching costs would be to high. It would require a complete rewrite of the reports and the never version of Actuate (BIRT) even required an almost complete report rewrite
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
It is quite intuitive to use. It is fit specifically for doing sentiment, emotion, and intention analysis as well as text classification and text summarization. I would have given 10 if it is fit for the purpose of doing image processing and analysis as well. There is a huge market to analyze video and image data.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Cloudera Data Science Workbench has excellence online resources support such as documentation and examples. On top of that the enterprise license also comes with SLA on opening a ticket to Cloudera Services and support for complaint handling and troubleshooting by email or through a phone call. On top of that it also offers additional paid training services.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I received answers mostly at once and got answered even further my question: they gave me interesting points of view and suggestion for deepening in the learning path
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Both the tools have similar features and have made it pretty easy to install/deploy/use. Depending on your existing platform (Cloudera vs. Azure) you need to pick the Workbench. Another observation is that Cloudera has better support where you can get feedback on your questions pretty fast (unlike MS). As its a new product, I expect MS to be more efficient in handling customers questions.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The main reason I personally changed over from Azure ML Studio is because it lacked any support for significant custom modelling with packages and services such as TensorFlow, scikit-learn, Microsoft Cognitive Toolkit and Spark ML. IBM Watson Studio provides these services and does so in a well integrated and easy to use fashion making it a preferable service over the other services that I have personally used.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
It is vastly superior to these in many ways, for complex reporting it is a much more sophisticated solution. Visualizations are very good. Javascript extensibility is very powerful, others don't support this or as well. Pentaho and MS are both OLAP oriented. Pentaho is moving more toward big data, which was not our primary focus. Others are stuck in the Crystal Reports Band metaphor.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Actuate can handle 50 to 60 sub reports inside a report very well.
Dynamically creating the datasource, chart, graph, reports are the main advantages. We can do any level of drilling, and can create a performance matrix dashboard efficiently.