Likelihood to Recommend If you hire for IT or Software development based roles, I can absolutely recommend this. It will improve the quality of candidates you are filtering through in your process and you will be able to add stakeholders early into the hiring process to make it more efficient. Pricing is very reasonable too so its not out of reach for even smaller organizations. Generally speaking though, if you dont hire in bulk for Software Developers etc, then maybe its not for you.
Read full review VidCruiter is best suited for those that want to be paperless and go the digital route. VidCruiter gives the option to record the live interviews so they remain on the platform if we ever need to go back to review. In my opinion there is not a scenario where this is not appropriate, because if you don't see a function of interest, VidCruiter will consider creating it or figure a way to make it happen for you
Read full review Pros The test cases are quite well-written, and the grade we earn as a result of them is very fair. Users can use a unit testing tool to perform their own unit testing, allowing them to double-check their code before submitting it. Intensive technical interview preparation The online evaluation option is an excellent approach to assess candidates. Simple UI for Simple Operations Read full review VidCruiter is my first Applicant Tracking System but it was still relatively easy to set up exactly to our needs and there was lots of support over email and the phone / internet meetings during the setup and after. It is easy to use and update too, no coding ability needed. The integrated video and live interviews are unique to VidCruiter and why we chose it over competing products. They are easy to setup and use and provide the HR staff with a much more personal feeling for who the applicants are. The auto rating of the applicants and their references along with the easy rating of applicant video interviews and any other data entered sorts applicants after what abilities are important to your company and makes it easy to start with the most suited candidates and work your way down. Read full review Cons The platform should provide candidates with detailed feedback, allowing them to identify areas for improvement if necessary. Furthermore, despite the fact that the assessment is complete, the platform prioritizes speed. In order to finish the assignment on time, people may be forced to forgo quality or desired output. They should improve the question selection procedure, as some of the questions are too long to finish in the allocated time. Read full review Humanizing the experience for applicants Give more information about how the video will be used Clarity on deadlines for performance task The error message is vague ("Either you have withdrawn from this process or the deadline to complete this process has been reached") which one? You should know! Read full review Likelihood to Renew I give it this rating because it is very easy to use. Not only that it is proctored and trusted. Moreover, the candidates find it easy to use given that it is a single test. This means that we get much more applications than using other platforms. This helps us to hire better faster and easier with codesignal.
Read full review This is our first season of using VidCruiter or any ATS. We are very happy with the time saved and level of organization and clarity that using VidCruiter has provided. We have a ton of ideas for improvements for the next season, and the flexibility of the system, the easy setup and maintenance and the very responsive support from VidCruiter makes this easy.
Read full review Usability The UI of configuring CodeSignal for a non-technical screener can be tricky to navigate at first. Once you get the hang of the platform and how to master customization, it becomes a much smoother experience. However, some restrictions to search functions and reporting still need improvement.
Read full review The system is easy and has built in explainers
Read full review Reliability and Availability Yes, the staff has been very quick
Read full review Performance Yes, pages load quickly, reports comes in a reasonable time frame, only when CodeSIgnal integrates, it provide small glitches.
Read full review Support Rating I am not sure whether or not they have replaced but surely emerged as a big competitor. Their support system should be good knowing that they are in completion with the best hackerrank. I feel they could do a much better job but I have not used their support much
Read full review 100% on point no matter what you ask
Read full review In-Person Training It has clear details for every staff to understand the basic, and staffs can communicate efficiently to provide strong backgrounds. Also, the manager who provided this training has collaborated well with the Codesignal staff so that everyone could learn more about CodeSignal and look at it from different users' perspectives. So the training was really helpful
Read full review Online Training There were some issues with the compiler
Read full review Implementation Rating No, everything went pretty well with no hiccups
Read full review No issues at all with implementation, they have a strong process to follow and support you.
Read full review Alternatives Considered CodeSignal's platform is the best in almost every aspect. It provides a nice user-friendly environment. The functionalities the environment provides are the best. It is a nice cheating-free platform that is very easy to understand and use. The scores provided are normalized and the range of scores provided is really easy to understand.
Read full review We selected VidCruiter over
Spark Hire mostly because of the ability to edit rubrics. In a world where equity is at the top, we must be able to rate candidates in a non-biased way and being able to edit the rubrics allows us to do so. We also through customer service was top notch at VidCruiter and decided to keep using it (we considered switching to
Spark Hire at one point)
Read full review Scalability It works on multiple departments.
Read full review Return on Investment It has been advantageous in terms of saving time for our interviewees due to its simpler approach. My coding abilities have greatly improved and continue to aid me in the interviews process. The User Interface has caused me to spend more time on this application and has prompted me to discover new and more productive development techniques. Read full review It could be a great ROI for those who are able to manage daily When not in use, overall contract terms still apply. Does need a good amount of time invested in using. Read full review ScreenShots