TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Contentsquare

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AContentsquare is an enterprise experience intelligence and Digital Analytics platform designed to track, visualize, and optimize user journeys across websites and mobile applications. The platform captures digital interaction telemetry—such as clicks, scrolls, hovers, and page drop-offs—without manual event tagging to power Web Analytics, session replays, funnel visualization, and experience monitoring.N/A

    Jedox

    Score8.8 out of 10
    N/AJedox is a Business Intelligence and Corporate Performance Management solution. According to the vendor, their solution’s unified planning, analysis and reporting empowers decision makers from finance, sales, purchasing and marketing. Additionally, the vendor says this solution helps business users work smarter, streamline business collaboration, and make insight-based decisions with confidence. The vendor also says 1,900 organizations in 127 countries are using Jedox for real-time planning…N/A
    Pricing
    ContentsquareJedox
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ContentsquareJedox
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesYes
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ContentsquareJedox
    Considered Both Products
    Contentsquare
    No answer on this topic
    Jedox AG
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    100%
    Would buy again
    53 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    50 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    53 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    44 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    95%
    Implementation went as expected
    42 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    ContentsquareJedox
    Mobile Capabilities
    Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and Jedox
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    8.0
    1 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Jedox
    7.4
    3 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Responsive Design for Web Access8.01 Ratings8.53 Ratings
    Mobile Application8.01 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile8.01 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Results and Analysis
    Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and Jedox
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    9.7
    1 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Jedox
    -
    Ratings
    Heatmap tool8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Click analytics10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scroll maps10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Conversion tracking10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Goal tracking10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Session Recording and Replay10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    User Segmentation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and Jedox
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    9.1
    4 Ratings
    19% above category average
    Pixel Perfect reports00 Ratings9.14 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards00 Ratings9.14 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates00 Ratings9.14 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and Jedox
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    8.3
    3 Ratings
    7% above category average
    Drill-down analysis00 Ratings8.23 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities00 Ratings8.23 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages00 Ratings8.53 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration00 Ratings8.53 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and Jedox
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    7.9
    3 Ratings
    0% below category average
    Publish to Web00 Ratings8.53 Ratings
    Publish to PDF00 Ratings7.93 Ratings
    Report Versioning00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling00 Ratings8.23 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and Jedox
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    5.6
    3 Ratings
    27% below category average
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)00 Ratings5.93 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization00 Ratings5.53 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics00 Ratings5.63 Ratings
    Access Control and Security
    Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and Jedox
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    8.8
    3 Ratings
    5% above category average
    Multi-User Support (named login)00 Ratings8.83 Ratings
    Role-Based Security Model00 Ratings8.83 Ratings
    Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)00 Ratings8.83 Ratings
    Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
    Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and Jedox
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    8.4
    4 Ratings
    4% above category average
    Long-term financial planning00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
    Financial budgeting00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Forecasting00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Scenario modeling00 Ratings7.04 Ratings
    Management reporting00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Consolidation and Close
    Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and Jedox
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    9.5
    3 Ratings
    20% above category average
    Financial data consolidation00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Journal entries and reports00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
    Multi-currency management00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Intercompany Eliminations00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Local and consolidated reporting00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Detailed Audit Trails00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Financial Reporting and Compliance
    Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and Jedox
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    9.3
    4 Ratings
    13% above category average
    Financial Statement Reporting00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Management Reporting00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Excel-based Reporting00 Ratings10.04 Ratings
    Automated board and financial reporting00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Analytics and Reporting
    Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and Jedox
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    9.7
    4 Ratings
    25% above category average
    Personalized dashboards00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    KPIs00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
    Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
    Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
    Integration
    Comparison of Integration features of Contentsquare, now with Hotjar and Jedox
    Feature
    Contentsquare, now with Hotjar
    -
    Ratings
    Jedox
    9.0
    4 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Flat file integration00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Excel data integration00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Direct links to 3rd-party data sources00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ContentsquareJedox
    Small Businesses
    Fullstory
    Score8.9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Quantum Metric
    Score7.5 out of 10
    IBM Planning Analytics
    Score8.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Glassbox
    Score6.3 out of 10
    Oracle Fusion Cloud Enterprise Performance Management
    Score7.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ContentsquareJedox
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.2
    (118 ratings)
    9.0
    (8 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    5.1
    (13 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    9.5
    (8 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.0
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (5 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (2 ratings)
    Data Sharing and Collaboration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.7
    (7 ratings)
    Data Sources
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (7 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    4.0
    (2 ratings)
    Vendor post-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Vendor pre-sale
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ContentsquareJedox
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Contentsquare
    Hotjar is good for a first pass at understanding user sentiment or locating potential usability issues. There are features such as "rage clicked" which shows recordings or instances when a user rage clicked or had an issue with your site. Hotjar has also been helpful to launch intercept surveys on mobile, desktop, and app, which not all competitor software allow. Hotjar recordings are fun to watch. "Watching Hotjar like Netflix" is a favorite pastime at work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jedox AG
    Best suited for financial consolidation and / or as a highly customized and compact EPM / BI solution (up to 100 CCU) with individual workflows, planning and reporting functionalities, with moderate number of users (no restrictions for any industry, all industries are covered well). It also has advanced reporting & data analysis requirements and provides an integration and reporting layer of imported data from different external systems (via ETL). It can help with migrating your legacy Excel-based business models to the Web. It is not well suited for Enterprise BI applications with expecting >500 CCU (users at the same time working with the system) - this may cause serious performance issues, as all data is kept in RAM. Jedox is also less suited for applications with heavy document management requirements (document management is not an out of the box functionality in Jedox and rather requires custom development through custom widgets etc.).
    Read full review
    Pros
    Contentsquare
    • Heat mapping is great on Hotjar. It is a good place to start when you are looking at the UX & CRO on your website. You can see the % of people clicking on elements on a page, how far they scroll, and mouse movements.
    • Hotjar is great for session recordings. These record the mouse movements, clicks, pages and scrolls of a user in video format. You can watch these to investigate what works well on a site and identify potential roadblocks and bugs.
    • Hotjar is great as it ensures that users details are anonymous; for instance, if you are watching a session recording, you cannot see what a user types in a form field, as Hotjar blanks this out.
    • Hotjar has a poll function, so you can have polls on your website.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jedox AG
    • Using the Excel add-in means that our team was almost instantly productive, being able to use a familiar interface to present and manipulate data.
    • Allows us to quickly do analysis and comparison of current and historic data.
    • Really good to produce meaningful management reporting that can be adapted responsively to business requirements.
    • Implementing Jedox in our budget cycle dramatically reduced the time and complexity of the process, while making it more transparent.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Contentsquare
    • Hotjar is primarily used for web-based experiences. Not that easy to use on mobile apps.
    • I'd love to see Hotjar integrated with Google Analytics for an even deeper view.
    • Hotjar is primarily used by smaller organizations...pricing can get steep quickly for larger organizations.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jedox AG
    • Diversity. Jedox can be applied to many different use cases from small to large deployments and from budgeting to enterprise class BI solutions. But rarely is one tool able to fulfill all of these requirements in one organisation. This value proposition can be complicated for prospective users.
    • Awareness. Jedox punches above its weight in capability and scalability, but not enough people have heard about it and therefore procurement processes can be drawn out as a result.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Contentsquare
    For small companies with limited user testing budgets, ClickTale serves as a useful user testing tool. When I cannot get the funds for in depth user testing, I always know that I have a baseline of information I can rely on
    Read full review
    Jedox AG
    For a period of 5 years all our customers using Jedox have renewed their licenses.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Contentsquare
    It is fairly easy to use, easy to explain, and easy to learn even for a non-techie like me. I admit I was a little intimidated when it was recommended by my developers, but I learned afterwards that there really was nothing to worry about. My experience has been awesome so far!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jedox AG
    To me Jedox deserves 10/10 because it is a consistent one-in-all platform with a modern look and feel. It is intuitive to use and allows you to make intuitive applications integrating traditional business intelligence with performance management functionality. It certainly has a short
    learning curve, especially for those that are familiar with MS Excel. An example: I've lost count but Jedox it is available in more than 25 languages. Another: Jedox does not require programming skills... it is developed to be used by the business.
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Contentsquare
    No answers on this topic
    Jedox AG
    Jedox has
    very few bugs. Reports are available through an Excel add-in, the web and/or
    mobile device (IOS/Android). In my opinion, availability also means high
    performance, not having to wait for the system to give you the required reports,
    analysis, dashboards instantly.
    Read full review
    Performance
    Contentsquare
    No answers on this topic
    Jedox AG
    Jedox is the fastest OLAP tool on the market. It can use GPU cards to increase performance even more
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Contentsquare
    Hotjar is a SaaS-based company, and as such has a good support service. Users can quickly submit support tickets through Hotjar's online portal. Enterprise customers get access to additional support members and have SLAs to support their larger, more complex needs. Overall, Hotjar is extremely reliable and I've never had to reach out to customer support.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jedox AG
    Jedox support in general is a professional and fast responding team. An easy-to-use ticketing system is in place. Bug-related questions are solved fast (responses come usually in a few hours after the question), but some questions / tickets, that are not Jedox-related bugs (for example some advanced questions about Jedox functionality), may be forwarded to Application Management team for further processing and then it may take several days or even weeks to get a response here -> there is room for improvement here.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Contentsquare
    No answers on this topic
    Jedox AG
    The implementation of SSO, SAML Authentication, HTTPS, Server splitting (Frontend / Backend servers) could be more standardized and made more user friendly to set up (e.g. via setup guide). Otherwise the implementation of Jedox is quick and simple when compared to other similar technologies.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Contentsquare
    ContentSquare [(Clicktale)] is going deeper on UX understanding than traditional web analytics tools. You can truly understand how a page is used (where users click or even miss click, on which part of the page they are spending most of their time, if some links are clicked but bad positioned on the page...), and that's a thing you can't really measure trough a traditional web analytics tool.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jedox AG
    Calumo is similar product to Jedox. I have used it extensively in my previous role. It was a major contender when we evaluated a BI platform for NIDA. Calumo is a great product as well and it was a very close call. Where we found Jedox to be a better fit for NIDA was the ability to prepare dynamic reports with ease without the need to learn MDX which was used extensively by Calumo to make dynamic reports which expand or shrink based on the underlying data. Another major benefit we saw in Jedox was the whole ETL process could be managed within Jedox instead of doing it in SQL server which negates having a dedicated SQL specialist role when the scale expands.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Contentsquare
    No answers on this topic
    Jedox AG
    Scalability is often another word for speed. Given enough data, enough users or enough calculations, the tool becomes slower and slower. You will find that Jedox has a very high performance that can even be increased by the use of grafical cards. Other thaen that it does not only offer BI (looking back based on historical ERP data) but also allows you to look forward through integrated budgetting, planning, forecasting, workflow and collaboration. Not easy to find a tool that can support so much business functionality. So, also pretty scalable in that respect.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Contentsquare
    • Our UX team can now use hard data to back up and validate design decisions that we make. Our role as usability experts is becoming more respected and integral to business objectives because we now have data that can back up our field of study and prove that our roles are demonstrably useful and necessary.
    • HotJar allows our small team of 3 UX designers to get research data as if we were a much larger team. Instead of painstakingly using our time to do guerrilla research, endless user observations, and other types of manual testing, we can now get a significant portion of our data from HotJar.
    • Using HotJar is actually giving our team a sense of excitement and enjoyment in our day-to-day usability work. Instead of seeing UX as a chore, HotJar is making data gathering and analyzing more fun, because we can see tangible results from a much larger pool of user/user-data than we could in the past.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Jedox AG
    • Financial budgeting and Forecasting are done in a centralized fashion in Jedox now instead of a decentralized excel based approach. A lot of cost savings and improved reliability
    • Easy to use self-help Dashboards and detailed reports
    • Web-based reporting instead of excel based
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Jedox Screenshots

    Screenshot of Management Dashboard with Google Maps WidgetScreenshot of ABC Analysis (Procurement)Screenshot of Executive Sales ReviewScreenshot of Finance DashboardScreenshot of Sales DashboardScreenshot of Start