Cornerstone’s PiiQ was an SMB offering that included core learning management and performance management systems, based on Sonar6 which was acquired by Cornerstone in 2012, and ultimately discontinued in 2022.
$8
per user per month
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
Score 7.2 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Halogen Software offered the TalentSpace talent management solution which was acquired by Saba in 2017 and that is no longer for sale.
N/A
Pricing
PiiQ by Cornerstone (discontinued)
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
Editions & Modules
PiiQ Performance
$8.00
per user per month
PiiQ Learning + Content
$8.00
per user per month
PiiQ Learning + Content & Performance
$15.00
per user per month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PiiQ by Cornerstone (discontinued)
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
$1,000 per installation
Required
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PiiQ by Cornerstone (discontinued)
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
Features
PiiQ by Cornerstone (discontinued)
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
PiiQ by Cornerstone (discontinued)
6.6
11 Ratings
21% below category average
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Course authoring
6.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Course catalog or library
6.811 Ratings
00 Ratings
Player/Portal
6.810 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning content
6.611 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile friendly
7.98 Ratings
00 Ratings
Progress tracking & certifications
6.210 Ratings
00 Ratings
Assignments
6.711 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance management
5.89 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning administration
6.611 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning reporting & analytics
6.911 Ratings
00 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
PiiQ by Cornerstone (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
7.8
8 Ratings
6% above category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
7.76 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
7.68 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
PiiQ by Cornerstone (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
5.1
33 Ratings
35% below category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
3.528 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
00 Ratings
3.628 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
7.232 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
4.929 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
6.432 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
PiiQ by Cornerstone (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Halogen TalentSpace (discontinued)
6.1
32 Ratings
10% below category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
4.628 Ratings
Plan weighting
00 Ratings
8.75 Ratings
Manager note taking
00 Ratings
6.012 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
3.625 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
5.430 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
00 Ratings
7.85 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
6.332 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
00 Ratings
8.15 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
7.024 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
3.130 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
I think it's a good platform for tracking and monitoring goals, feedback, and development. We don't use the 1:1 meeting feature, however, I can see how that would be valuable for many organizations. I do like that it is very customizable, however, that also presents problems in that sometimes forms and/or processes can be a bit challenging to create easily and quickly.
Enables employees to draft work goals and collaborate with their supervisors on a final version - improves mutual understanding right up front.
Combines performance goal ratings with competency ratings and provides a blended score. Simplifies the goal weighting so you don't have to do any calculations.
9-box matrix provides useful definitions and descriptions so managers can prepare development notes or plans for individual employees.
1:1 agendas are easy to create, add comments to and prompt excellent conversation flow on the topics that truly matter to the manager and the employee.
The system can be easily customized to reflect your company's language and culture. We did this in several areas of the platform (goals, development, learning), and it made a world of difference in the understanding and adaptation of our users. One example is that in each learning module, we added 3 questions in the course description so that managers would be automatically prompted to ask to follow up / learning transfer questions when their employees enroll and take a learning course.
Halogen support is outstanding. Any question I have had has been answered upon the first contact or within 24 hours.
Would be good to have have a virtual "top level" (eg board) user built in to allow senior execs without a direct manager to be able to be set up with KPIs instead of having to create a dummy user
Reports have difficulty downloading if pop ups disabled or in some browser environments
When competencies are updated while a cycle is open, any changes don't effect that open cycle but only future ones. Would be nice to be able to have the option to apply changes to existing "open" cycles
My organization does not use all of the functions/modules that Halogen offers, but I find that those modules still appear on the Halogen main page. I think a great area for improvement is to hide these functions so as not to confuse employees.
It's not that CSB isn't a decent performance management system, but we have decided to go with just one vendor (Workday) for an HRIS/performance management/payroll system so we can directly relate pay to performance. We are more interested in having just one system that "talks" to the other pieces instead of having to work with several vendors. It reduces the hassle of having to communicate with different support teams, having different contracts, and so on.
Implementing a new system and process company wide is never an easy task. We moved so quickly in such a short period of time that we were able to learn quickly but also have the opportunity to improve the Halogen experience. We will more than likely will renew our use of Halogen as we already are seeing a small impact which hopefully in the long run will lead to a greater impact
There are specific things within the goals and competencies that are user-friendly. For example, the rating slider isn't great in my opinion. You can slide in between ratings which can create some odd scoring (if you use scoring). It seems a better solution would be a drop down where you select your rating. There are also some glitches in the system and have been told Cornerstone is aware of them but are focused on delivering new features. There are workarounds, but that doesn't seem to be a great answer.
Halogen is very intuitive and provides very clean work-space ... lots of white space and modern layouts. There is more than one way to accomplish your action, too!
The saving process slows it down. It doesn’t auto save. If you leave a page, it will sometimes warn you, but not always. When you hit the save button, a window pops up that says creating/saving packets. It feels very archaic.
My assistant could better address this issue. My perception is that there is not immediate assistance, and that there can be a wait for help. That is not a negative, just a perception. I have not used support in two years.
We only purchased the appraisal module and without the other modules offered, you are really limited in what you can do and the process becomes much more involved with needing to maintain information across multiple platforms. We found that they charge for everything and call it "consulting." We poured so much money and time into a system that was just overkill for what we really needed.
I think we could have done a better job of rolling out the tool to our managers. We were under a tight timeline. In the training, we showed them everything and said go do it by this date. Looking back, I would have done it in pieces: for example, 2 weeks to write goals, 2 weeks to get sign-off from direct reports. I just let them go at it. Since then we’ve moved to agile development environment and are applying the technique to everything. In future would only do through change sprint. It is a big change I didn’t take it seriously enough.
I had a team of 3 project managing. You need a champion from every department to make sure you’re getting it right and to make sure what’s happening is communicated. It’s not something you can do without input from department heads
Lesson.ly has been great to work with but it is a very clear and simple, user-friendly system that anyone can pick up with very little training as it is self-explanatory. It also has a great mobile interface and lots of different features that are easy to add for the admin but really impactful for the user.
I have used other systems in the past and I like that Halogen provides everything in one space. I would like to see a more developed way to report training, not in the LMS, but I think that for the most part that Halogen is a robust system that is superior to its competition.
It's tool and it's only as good as the person wielding it. The investment in PiiQ was accompanied by a quarterly cadence and manager feedback training. We feel like our employees are given regular feedback and bonuses are tied to objective accomplishment.
We are able to get our reviews done in a quicker amount of time. Instead of 4-8 weeks we were able to get it done under a month.
Halogen has gotten better at given us a heads up when the system will be down. Most patches are done overnight so we can at least verify it was done, but their success rate of a patch not breaking something is not at 99%. So we do lose productivity when the system is down.
The tool is easier to do so there are fewer questions from users outside the core team.