Cresta vs. Landbot

Cresta would best be utilized if your customer service team is large, services a high volume of customers, and the conversations with those customers are very detailed and long. Cresta is less appropriate for small teams, low amounts of customers chatting in, and the conversations are very transactional and simple

Incentivized

Well Suited: If you are looking for a bot - - that is easy to build, that requires no IT person - that has competitive prices - that has a clean and easy reporting option, which can help the data analytics. Not Well Suited: Though it has Dialogflow integration, you cannot use it as a complete self-learning bot solution. If you are looking for a bot that is self-learning you have to go for IBM Watson Assistant/Dialogflow/SAP Conversational AI.

Incentivized

• Simple visual constructor for your bots
• Many bot patterns
• Zapier and Webhooks
• Full customization CSS for your bots

Incentivized

• Keywords Jump Feature: As a feature, it is good. But there is a scope of improvement that I see. In our Business, there are a lot of words that are similar for example Bearing/Bear ring/Bearing. So, at times the bot takes some time to find the exact keyword what the user wants and then route it accordingly. Most of the time, it does right, but at times it doesn't.

Incentivized

Everything is simple. Very helpful support team. Always answer your question and help solve the problem.

Incentivized

Drift is quite pricey, on the cost part, Landbot was much better with almost similar features. Also, on the UI front, Landbot was a pretty decent tool compared with Drift or MobileMonkey. The usage was easy, the reporting was very easy to get. Considering all these parameters, we chose Landbot for our Organization.

Incentivized

• Fast payback on advertising budget due to high conversion.
• Need a mobile application for chat operators, if the leads want to chat with a living person.

Incentivized