Critical Mention vs. Grade.us
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Critical Mention | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Critical Mention headquartered in New York offers their eponymous media monitoring platform for public relations and crisis management. | N/A |
Grade.us | Score8.9 out of 10 | N/A | Grade.us allows businesses to generate, monitor, and market online reviews to increase the companies visibility in search, create and showcase social proof to build their reputation, and collect feedback to improve their customer experience. Create a Review Funnel Landing Page The review funnel landing page allows users to segment happy customers to leave a review on the major like Google and Facebook and industry-specific review sites. Generate… | $180 3 seats ($60 for additional seats) |
| Critical Mention | Grade.us | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | We offer a free basic version of white-labeling the dashboard for agencies, but also offer Premium white-label. Premium White-label Option Agency customers may optionally choose to put the entire Grade.us dashboard under your brand and domain. There are additional annual costs to cover the SSL certificate, dedicated hosting, and installation/renewal: $440/yr. This option is not available to Professional plan customers. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Critical Mention | Grade.us | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
71% Would buy again 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
57% Delivers good value for the price 4 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
71% Happy with the feature set 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
86% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
83% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Critical Mention | Grade.us | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Help a Reporter Out (HARO) Score5 out of 10 | Brand24 Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Cision Communications Cloud Score8 out of 10 | Birdeye Score8.7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Meltwater Score7.6 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Critical Mention | Grade.us | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 1.6 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | - |
| Usability | 9.0 | - |
| Availability | 8.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 9.3 |
| Implementation Rating | 10.0 | - |
| Critical Mention | Grade.us | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Grade.us Screenshots |












