Crownpeak CMS is a composable, enterprise-ready content management system that empowers global teams to seamlessly orchestrate personalized digital experiences across all content channels. Marketing teams can create, manage, and monitor inclusive, accessible, and transactional experiences fast without compromising on functionality, security, or service.
N/A
OpenText Web CMS
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
OpenText
Web CMS (TeamSite) accelerates and simplifies the end-to-end digital content and campaign
lifecycle, from content creation and rich media management to omnichannel
publication, optimization, automation, commerce, and community. According to the vendor, with
TeamSite, users can:
Capture diverse digital
audiences with amazing brand experiences – Give customers and prospects consistent, high-quality brand
experiences across devices and channels, and foster closer…
N/A
Optimizely One
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Optimizely One is a digital experience platform, helping marketing and product teams accelerate digital growth, powering the marketing and digital lifecycle from planning to analysis through a unified workflow. Optimizely One accelerates every step of the process with embedded AI.
Crownpeak DXM has a better total cost of ownership with a real and straightforward SaaS model for version updates. DXM has a better composable enterprise capability, allowing for easier and more effective API integrations. Crownpeak partner relationships are more open and …
As an agency, we work with several different content / digital experience platforms. My clients who chose Crownpeak over other options did so primarily due to the lack of need to perform costly upgrades and the ability to support multiple development options (i.e., not just …
OpenText Web CMS
No answer on this topic
Optimizely One
No answer on this topic
Features
Crownpeak CMS
OpenText Web CMS
Optimizely One
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Crownpeak CMS
8.9
25 Ratings
8% above category average
OpenText Web CMS
8.6
7 Ratings
5% above category average
Optimizely One
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.925 Ratings
8.67 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Crownpeak CMS
8.0
22 Ratings
3% above category average
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
7 Ratings
2% above category average
Optimizely One
-
Ratings
API
7.819 Ratings
8.76 Ratings
00 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
8.120 Ratings
7.26 Ratings
00 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Crownpeak CMS
8.1
27 Ratings
4% above category average
OpenText Web CMS
8.0
7 Ratings
3% above category average
Optimizely One
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG editor
7.726 Ratings
7.87 Ratings
00 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
7.626 Ratings
7.76 Ratings
00 Ratings
Admin section
8.325 Ratings
8.17 Ratings
00 Ratings
Page templates
8.427 Ratings
7.46 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
8.425 Ratings
8.37 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publishing workflow
8.527 Ratings
8.17 Ratings
00 Ratings
Form generator
7.823 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Library of website themes
00 Ratings
8.36 Ratings
00 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Crownpeak CMS
7.9
27 Ratings
6% above category average
OpenText Web CMS
7.9
7 Ratings
6% above category average
Optimizely One
-
Ratings
Content taxonomy
7.725 Ratings
7.97 Ratings
00 Ratings
SEO support
8.524 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bulk management
8.122 Ratings
8.27 Ratings
00 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions
7.321 Ratings
7.57 Ratings
00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Crownpeak CMS
OpenText Web CMS
Optimizely One
Small Businesses
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Crownpeak DXM is a great solution if you are looking for a flexible platform that allows engineers to quickly develop while also making it easy for content authors to work especially in scenarios where you need multi-language support. It is also good for scenarios where you want a cloud-based solution and are looking for just one vendor to handle hosting and offer the CMS.
OpenText TeamSite is well-suited to large, enterprise-wide implementations where customization, content governance, and dynamic content distribution is needed or prioritized. It is probably not ideal for smaller sites with simple architecture and few resources to manage custom implementation.
It is well suited for heavy-duty A/B testing where management would like to see and quantitatively determine the effect of a change. It is not so efficient to try for a single page simple form, except when the form is part of a larger workflow. The security model is not very well understood, including RBAC and protection against injection attacks.
Build & manage digital experiences without dependency on your IT team
Built-in Digital Quality tool (DQM) tool allows you to check the quality of content and any accessibility issues and immediately flag any issues before publishing.
Build websites with the component-based technology and spend less effort in creating the best user experience for the end-user
Crownpeak moved to a web browser admin tool in 2018, which has made the admin experience much better, but there are still a couple of features missing from the browser version that won't arrive until later in 2019.
Integration with 3rd party digital asset management tools would be great.
Smoother integration with source control would be nice.
Crownpeak DXM is a flexible easy to use CMS platform speaking to the most challenging localization scenarios. Crownpeak users have the freedom to integrate DXM platform with their existing technology at no cost. Moving from legacy systems to the Saas platform is painless and cost-effective. Extensive targeting and personalization options are something that users will benefit from.
Overall, it's a solid package with the potential to offer much functionality with appropriate resources applied. There are a few issues with the authoring interface that OpenText should address before its a top shelf authoring experience.
Pages load very fast on production (assuming you develop with basic SEO practices in place) due to Crownpeak's publishing architecture. The slide downside is that publishing can be a bit slow at times.
Crownpeak DXM's service and support are outstanding. We have immediate access to both the tech support team and the software engineering team. We can get a support person on the phone whenever needed, and we can schedule impromptu training sessions at any time. Best support I have ever received from a platform provider in 20 years of software and application development.
Our technical resources engage with OpenText TeamSite so I don't have direct experience. However, critical issues that we need help with seem to get the attention they deserve without issue. However, training and user resources for business owner roles are a bit lacking and some annoying issues with the authoring interface should be addressed sooner.
We received on-site training from Crownpeak, the trainer had touched upon every possible scenario and provided great insights about the product & ease of implementation.
My team left training with a solid understanding of how to use the product and the developer training ended with a test to ensure the ability to properly develop was learned properly. Recently, Crownpeak has added a self-paced training option which makes it extremely flexible to on-board new developers.
SaaS model is perfect for us to avoid slow and costly version updates to get access to new features and functions. Crownpeak is a true SaaS model, so we get all the good new stuff without the need to invest in effort, time or money. this frees our teams to focus on content creation and deployment, which is pretty fast because the DXM publishes straight to html through the headless model.
I was not at this team within my organization during the evaluation period of Crownpeak. However, my previous team used Sitecore. Crownpeak is a bit easier to use from a UI perspective and has more creative options within the tool. Sitecore's clunky UI also was a reason I found out later why we ended up using Crownpeak as our DXM.
It offers more content editing features at a relatively low cost thus overall deployment is lower in cost. It has great customer support who are always there to support and answer to our needs thus making the process of deployment seamless at every stage and offering training for working with their product.
There is a big difference between the two: Google Optimize uses Bayesian analysis while Optimizely uses Frequenting. There is a risk of counting multiple visits. Google Optimize data isn't available instantly (if I remember correctly). Optimizely's analyses dashboard is a lot richer and offers a better experience, though it may get intimidating.
In some recent projects we have delivered to our clients, we were able to roll out sites in shorter time period due the scalability of the Crownpeak's DXM solution.
I'm pretty sure it raises our back-end development costs by making the development process (of creating input forms and producing outputs from the content) more complicated and painful than it needs to be.
It helps lock our clients in to us because not a whole lot of agencies have Crownpeak expertise.
It helps our clients not have to deal with their own IT teams, which they tend to dislike working with.
We integrated with google analytics, now we have the proper comprehension of our audience data reception and behaviors - we've greatly improved on personalized marketing.
Quick publication of content across the main digital channels.
We run our digital campaigns swiftly.
We've maintained our brand consistency for three years.