Cube vs. Looker

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cube
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Cube is a financial planning & analysis (FP&A) platform that aims to enable finance teams to be more strategic and positively contribute to company growth activities by spending less time on manual, repetitive task, from Cube Planning headquartered in New York.N/A
Looker
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Looker is a BI application with an analytics-oriented application server that sits on top of relational data stores. It includes an end-user interface for exploring data, a reusable development paradigm for data discovery, and an API for supporting data in other systems.N/A
Pricing
CubeLooker
Editions & Modules
Enterprise
Contact us
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CubeLooker
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredRequired
Additional DetailsMust contact sales team for pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CubeLooker
Considered Both Products
Cube
Chose Cube
Cube was the most flexible while still doing everything we need it to do. Because it is a spreadsheet native platform we could quickly and easily integrate it into the processes we already had. While at the same time learning how Cube worked so that we could fully leverage its …
Looker

No answer on this topic

Features
CubeLooker
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Cube
7.5
21 Ratings
2% below category average
Looker
7.6
133 Ratings
8% below category average
Pixel Perfect reports8.96 Ratings6.7109 Ratings
Customizable dashboards6.418 Ratings8.4132 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates7.318 Ratings7.6114 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.9
47 Ratings
10% above category average
Looker
7.1
131 Ratings
12% below category average
Drill-down analysis9.646 Ratings6.7127 Ratings
Formatting capabilities8.435 Ratings6.8129 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages8.06 Ratings6.055 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration9.828 Ratings8.8130 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.4
21 Ratings
2% above category average
Looker
8.1
127 Ratings
1% below category average
Publish to Web8.211 Ratings7.8105 Ratings
Publish to PDF8.511 Ratings8.1112 Ratings
Report Versioning8.515 Ratings7.983 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling8.48 Ratings8.5109 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.6
12 Ratings
11% above category average
Looker
6.6
127 Ratings
19% below category average
Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.811 Ratings7.7123 Ratings
Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization9.18 Ratings7.5109 Ratings
Predictive Analytics8.87 Ratings4.66 Ratings
Pattern Recognition and Data Mining8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
Access Control and Security
Comparison of Access Control and Security features of Product A and Product B
Cube
9.3
40 Ratings
8% above category average
Looker
7.5
127 Ratings
12% below category average
Multi-User Support (named login)9.233 Ratings7.8119 Ratings
Role-Based Security Model9.530 Ratings7.3104 Ratings
Multiple Access Permission Levels (Create, Read, Delete)9.231 Ratings7.3121 Ratings
Report-Level Access Control9.09 Ratings7.459 Ratings
Single Sign-On (SSO)9.625 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile Capabilities
Comparison of Mobile Capabilities features of Product A and Product B
Cube
9.3
10 Ratings
20% above category average
Looker
5.4
94 Ratings
35% below category average
Responsive Design for Web Access9.79 Ratings5.590 Ratings
Mobile Application8.93 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Dashboard / Report / Visualization Interactivity on Mobile9.24 Ratings6.084 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Product A and Product B
Cube
7.5
54 Ratings
9% below category average
Looker
-
Ratings
Long-term financial planning6.545 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial budgeting8.951 Ratings00 Ratings
Forecasting7.349 Ratings00 Ratings
Scenario modeling6.644 Ratings00 Ratings
Management reporting8.351 Ratings00 Ratings
Consolidation and Close
Comparison of Consolidation and Close features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.5
49 Ratings
7% above category average
Looker
-
Ratings
Financial data consolidation8.944 Ratings00 Ratings
Journal entries and reports9.623 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-currency management7.113 Ratings00 Ratings
Intercompany Eliminations8.514 Ratings00 Ratings
Minority Ownership7.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Local and consolidated reporting10.020 Ratings00 Ratings
Detailed Audit Trails8.232 Ratings00 Ratings
Financial Reporting and Compliance
Comparison of Financial Reporting and Compliance features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.2
54 Ratings
2% above category average
Looker
-
Ratings
Financial Statement Reporting8.745 Ratings00 Ratings
Management Reporting7.948 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel-based Reporting9.249 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated board and financial reporting6.538 Ratings00 Ratings
XBRL support for regulatory filing8.95 Ratings00 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.1
37 Ratings
0% above category average
Looker
-
Ratings
Personalized dashboards8.030 Ratings00 Ratings
Color-coded scorecards7.515 Ratings00 Ratings
KPIs8.128 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost and profitability analysis8.228 Ratings00 Ratings
Key Performance Indicator setting7.722 Ratings00 Ratings
Benchmarking with external data9.211 Ratings00 Ratings
Integration
Comparison of Integration features of Product A and Product B
Cube
8.9
46 Ratings
7% above category average
Looker
-
Ratings
Flat file integration9.035 Ratings00 Ratings
Excel data integration9.538 Ratings00 Ratings
Direct links to 3rd-party data sources8.338 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CubeLooker
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Yellowfin
Yellowfin
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Centage
Centage
Score 9.4 out of 10
Reveal
Reveal
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
OneStream
OneStream
Score 8.8 out of 10
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Kyvos Semantic Layer
Score 9.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CubeLooker
Likelihood to Recommend
9.1
(58 ratings)
8.3
(132 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(8 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(12 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(14 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Professional Services
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
CubeLooker
Likelihood to Recommend
Cube Planning, Inc
1) The budget process. In QBO the budgeting capability is non-existant, unless you like manually typing in every scenario and not being able to budget by class. Cube houses my budget/forecast scenarios & lets me view and analyze by my company's preferred data points; department, GL account, vendor, & sales campaign. I'm able to run monthly budget variance reports and plan for the future with ease. 2) We've begun using Cube to help analyze profitablity by sales job. We've never had such easy access to this type of info in the past, so this is a benefit I can directly attribute to Cube. 3) We're beginning now to use an integration with our payroll software to work on headcount planning and payroll analysis.
Read full review
Google
When data drives potential for new orders, Looker earns its place in our tech stack. If, on the other hand, we are hoping for pipeline generation, Looker is useful if you are willing to repeatedly go check customer utilizations .... it is not appropriate if you are hoping to automate data analysis for this purpose.
Read full review
Pros
Cube Planning, Inc
  • Push/pull information across any Google Sheet or Excel workbook.
  • Budget at a much more granular level (by month by account by the department by vendor).
  • Custom mapping to allow for multiple cuts of the same data.
  • Bulk range selection within a workbook.
Read full review
Google
  • Show visited pages - sessions, pageviews - which programs are viewed the most.
  • Displays session source/medium views to see where users are coming from.
  • It shows the video titles, URLs, and event counts so we can monitor the performance of our videos.
  • It gives a graphic face to the numbers, such as using bar charts, pie graphs, and other charts to show user trends or which channels are driving engagement.
  • Our clients like to see the top pages visited for a month.
  • I like the drop-and-drag approach, and building charts is a little easier than it was before.
Read full review
Cons
Cube Planning, Inc
  • Limited to 8 top line dimensions. Although you can bring in as many attributes of data as you want, but I would really like Cube to increase top line dimensions to 10.
  • The ability for cross level interaction within multiples cube would be a major plus once implemented.
Read full review
Google
  • Documentation is scarce, and very difficult to find when you need it.
  • Pricing is unclear, particularly as you look to scale your reports across the business.
  • Data from other sources is not represented in the system as well as first party Google services.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cube Planning, Inc
No answers on this topic
Google
I give it this rating because it deems as effective, I am able to complete majority of my tasks using this app. It is very helpful when analyzing the data provided and shown in the app and it's just overall a great app for Operational use, despite the small hiccups it has (live data).
Read full review
Usability
Cube Planning, Inc
No answers on this topic
Google
Looker is relatively easy to use, even as it is set up. The customers for the front-end only have issues with the initial setup for looker ml creations. Other "looks" are relatively easy to set up, depending on the ETL and the data which is coming into Looker on a regular basis.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Cube Planning, Inc
No answers on this topic
Google
No objections
Read full review
Performance
Cube Planning, Inc
No answers on this topic
Google
Somehow resources heavy, both on server and client. I recommned at least 50Mbs data rate and high performance desktop comouter to be abke to run comolex tasks and configure larger amount of data. On the other hand, the client does not need to worry when viewing, the performance is usually ok
Read full review
Support Rating
Cube Planning, Inc
No answers on this topic
Google
Never had to work with support for issues. Any questions we had, they would respond promptly and clearly. The one-time setup was easy, by reading documentation. If the feature is not supported, they will add a feature request. In this case, LDAP support was requested over OKTA. They are looking into it.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Cube Planning, Inc
No answers on this topic
Google
Very satisfied, easy to implement
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cube Planning, Inc
Cube was just a lot easier to use than Vena. We took some time to look at Vena as well and while their product was impressive, our organization was not yet there. We needed something we could implement quickly, and in today's day and age I think that is a very important quality to have. Start up and early stage companies do not have the luxury of implementation teams and massive IT resources so Cube was a huge help.
Read full review
Google
Looker Studio, you can easily report on data from various sources without programming. Looker Studio is available at no charge for creators and report viewers. Enterprise customers who upgrade to Looker Studio Pro will receive support and expanded administrative features, including team content management. So it's good.
Read full review
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
Cube Planning, Inc
No answers on this topic
Google
Perfect price to performance
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cube Planning, Inc
  • It has decreased the amount of time it takes to build reports by days
  • I can rest easy knowing the knowledge is accurate and there is no human error
  • I have been able to create more reports than I ever dreamed of with the new time and ease of use
Read full review
Google
  • Looker has a poignant impact on our business's ROI objectives. As an advertising exchange we have specific goals for daily requests and fill, and having premade Looks to monitor this is an integral piece of our operational capability
  • To facilitate an efficient monthly billing cycle in our organization, Looker is essential to track estimated revenue and impression delivery by publisher. Without the Looks we have set up, we would spend considerably more time and effort segmenting revenue by vertical.
  • Looker's unique value proposition is making analytical tools more digestible to people without conventional analytical experience. Other competing tools like Tableau require considerably more training and context to successfully use, and the ability to easily plot different visualizations is one of its greatest selling points.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Looker Screenshots

Screenshot of a Looker dashboard with a geo chart.