CubeAPM vs. SolarWinds Pingdom
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CubeAPM | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | CubeAPM is a full-stack observability platform built on OpenTelemetry that enables engineering teams to monitor services, infrastructure, logs, and metrics from a single pane of glass. Teams can self-host CubeAPM inside their own cloud or on-premises environment, or use it as a managed deployment. It delivers full-stack visibility with smart sampling, alerting, tracing, and unlimited data retention at a flat usage-based price of $0.15 per GB. Many teams face a trade-off in… | $0.15 per month per GB |
SolarWinds Pingdom | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | SolarWinds Pingdom is a website uptime monitoring and alert tool, with additional reporting and Real User Monitoring capabilities. Pingdom is part of SolarWinds’s DevOps package, enabling full-stack monitoring as a service. | $14.95 per month |
| CubeAPM | SolarWinds Pingdom | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | CubeAPM follows a transparent & predictable usage-based pricing model starting at $0.15 per GB of data ingested per month. Unlike traditional APM tools that charge by host or agent, CubeAPM pricing scales linearly with data volume—no hidden fees, overages, or lock-ins. Teams can deploy self-hosted or managed versions with unlimited data retention and predictable monthly billing. Enterprise plans include ISO 27001-certified infrastructure, dedicated support, and volume-based discounts. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| CubeAPM | SolarWinds Pingdom | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Would buy again 52 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Delivers good value for the price 52 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Happy with the feature set 52 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 43 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 49 Answers | |
| CubeAPM | SolarWinds Pingdom | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic |
| Medium-sized Companies | Logz.io Score8.3 out of 10 | SolarWinds Web Performance Monitor (WPM) Score8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | NetBrain Technologies Score8.8 out of 10 | No answers on this topic |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| CubeAPM | SolarWinds Pingdom | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 4.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 10.0 |
| Performance | - | 6.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 4.1 |
| CubeAPM | SolarWinds Pingdom | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | CubeAPM Screenshots | SolarWinds Pingdom Screenshots |












