Darwinbox vs. JobAdder

Employees that come into work are needed to clock in to get paid for the amount of time they are working per day. They will log on to Darwinbox and clock in as soon as they can. Some will use the PTO they have available to use. HR will be able to make payroll in a timely manner for employees.

Incentivized

I've already answered this question. JobAdder is easy to use, easy to configure, has great support, has a strong product roadmap, good partner integrations...really a top-notch platform.

Incentivized

• Easy to use and navigate.
• Simple and intuitive interface.
• Covers all HR needs in one software.

Incentivized

• Flexible workflows
• Intuitive design
• Wealth of third-party integrations
• Easy-to-access support and knowledge hub
• Good onboarding process

Incentivized

• The app version is a bit lankier than the pc version.
• Interface customization would be great for individuals wanting to change style.
• No other real issue to improve, possibly lower the price but that's not too bad.

Incentivized

• Hard to get in touch with technical support
• Has a price to it
• Hard to clear alerts

Incentivized

Darwinbox is up there with ADP in terms of quality for employers to use in such an open-level style. I personally would support the use of Darwinbox against the competition.

Incentivized

Many of the products we have evaluated are not available on the list. We've looked at Mindscope Cura, we've used Mindscope (before Cura), we were long-time users of Sendouts (before Bullhorn acquisition), and we were on a product called Compas for a few years before moving to JobAdder. JobAdder excels in product features/capabilities, ease of use, and incredible support. We have been very pleased with our selection!

Incentivized

• The ability to view the organization structure and functional structure for the entire company.
• One-stop solution for talent acquisition, payroll, leaves, reimbursements, attendance (time-sheet), holidays, etc. So I don't have to open a lot of different apps.

Incentivized

• Improved time-to-hire drastically by isolating the process to one system
• Improved hiring manager involvement in process
• Improved allocation of tasks amongst recruitment team
• Improved reporting on recruitment activities which helped to monitor team workload

Incentivized