TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Decap CMS

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ANetlify CMS is an open source Git-based CMS for static site generators. it runs 100% in a browser.

    $0

    Drupal

    Score7.1 out of 10
    N/ADrupal is a free, open-source content management system written in PHP that competes primarily with Joomla and Plone. The standard release of Drupal, known as Drupal core, contains basic features such as account and menu management, RSS feeds, page layout customization, and system administration.N/A

    Joomla

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/AJoomla! is a free and open source content management system used to publish web content. Included features are page caching, RSS feeds, printable versions of pages, news flashes, blogs, polls, a search function, and support for language internationalization.N/A
    Pricing
    Decap CMSDrupalJoomla
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Decap CMSDrupalJoomla
    Free Trial
    NoNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Decap CMSDrupalJoomla
    Considered Multiple Products
    Netlify
    No answer on this topic
    Open Source
    Chose Drupal
    We use both, for different projects (Joomla and Drupal). Drupal proved to be more robust, more secure and more integrable with PHP applications.
    Drupal requires a more senior technical team but allows for more complex activities. It's great if you have a medium to a large …
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    Drupal is far more usable and stable than Joomla!, and the developer community support is significantly stronger. While Drupal is often compared to WordPress, they are fundamentally different platforms, and in most projects, it's very clear when the requirements are beyond what …
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    We were looking for an open source CMS. WordPress wasn't powerful enough for our needs. Joomla was too difficult for our team to use.
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    We did a comparison of Drupal against Joomla, WordPress, and Ingeniux. We found that its multiple themes available for web pages, user management, comment management, and form generation stands apart from its competitors.
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    WordPress would be the best alternative to Drupal that I've seen, but in my experience, Drupal is better at complex websites that need a lot of customization. WordPress would be much better suited for a blog than Drupal.

    I only briefly looked at Joomla, and I wasn't impressed.
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    Joomla is terrible. I would never recommend Joomla over Drupal. Drupal's community is much more active and new product updates come out much more quickly.

    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    Drupal is well known for being the most flexible of the "Big 3" players in the CMS space. While WordPress remains the most popular due to ease of setup and use, it lacks the flexibility, depth, and modularity of Drupal, causing it to be less desirable when you want more control …
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    Drupal is the king of enterprise opensource content management systems. It is the most robust and comes from the most forward thinking community. Drupal 8 is designed for the next evolution in web design and development. WordPress and Joomla! are stuck in the web 2.0 revolution …
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    WordPress has more plugins and it is easier for editing (as a platform) for developers, but Drupal is built on a modern programming language structure and principles, this it makes it much more efficient as CMS. Joomla is another CMS system but it is not widely popular as WordPr…
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    WordPress, Joomla, Expression Engine, Umbraco, Rails.
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    Drupal has a huge amount of community support and a plethora of modules to choose from that add new site features for both users and admins. Joomla! would be a close second but I lack enough experience with it to say if it provides as much customization options. OpenCMS is open …
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    Drupal is highly customizable unlike WordPress and Joomla. It may take a longer time to set up but it works well for the needs of the organizations it is set up for.
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    WordPress is like working with an old brick building, aesthetically it's appealing, but restructuring it is difficult, messy, and often takes a considerable amount more effort. It isn't as feature rich, most of the module add-ons are either not well made, or not open-source, so …
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    Drupal cannot really compare to Joomla. Joomla is also a free CMS, is faster to set up, is faster to load for visitors, is easier to maintain, and the extensions are much more reliable - even the free ones.

    Drupal and WordPress are very different, as Drupal has the power to be …
    Chose Drupal
    Drupal can be more complex to learn, but it offers a much wider range of applications. Drupal’s front and backend can be customized from design to functionality to allow for a wide range of uses. If someone wants to create something more complex than a simple site or blog, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    In my mind, Drupal and WordPress are the top open source CMSes, and I rarely recommend not going with an open source CMS. WordPress can be great, especially for single developers, but I find that the code structure and extensibility of Drupal makes it superior for many use …
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    Drupal has strong role-based permissions for users, powerful content blocks for editing, and granular customizing options in their views. For a company or organization requiring a lot of customization, Drupal can be a really powerful tool. However, Drupal does require …
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    We went with Drupal due to prior experience with Drupal as a CMS, however, the previous site was not as complex.
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    Drupal like any other software has its own unique strengths and weaknesses. We didn't select to use it for any particular project of our own, we chose to offer Drupal to our end users so that they can make a decision on their own of what the product excels at.
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    I have used Joomla (a long time ago), and Wordpress. Joomla seemed like a beginner's tool for someone looking for a lightweight CMS. Wordpress is slowly getting there where Drupal is now, but still far behind. Though Wordpress' admin section is beautifully designed and very …
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    I normally prefer to use WordPress if I need CMS capabilities. If I need more than that, I go with framework. Drupal could be an option when you have to develop something more complex than a blog, or pure content pages.
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    Drupal is a powerful choice for a CMS. Although having complex admin menu and setup process, it has quality security, SEO and speed built in as default. Drupal has caching built into the system, making it double the speed of other compared CMS’s like WordPress. Drupal is …
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    Drupal is better than all of these other products 10 times over simply because you can do anything that those other products can do and so much more. You'd need a combination of those products to do what Drupal can do all on its own. Each of those products have inherent …
    Incentivized
    Chose Drupal
    Personal experience with WordPress has been that it offers a small fraction of the tools found with Drupal. Experience with Joomla was that add-ons were too far-reaching; they did not allow combining a few smaller tools to craft your final goals. Personal experience with Django …
    Chose Drupal
    We opted against Wordpress and Joomla simply because of scalability issues. Each of those platforms are great for performing specific tasks, like creating basic pages, blogs, etc. However, when it comes to building an infrastructure that is going to support 50,000+ users with …
    The Joomla Project
    Chose Joomla
    All the reviews I read are lazy. They all say the same old, WP is easy, Joomla! harder but good and Drupal security. But that's so old, as they were measuring a decade ago. Joomla! has moved ahead. Its got over 70 languages and has been multi-language from the start. [It] was …
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    WordPress is designed in a way to make it fairly fool-proof for the admin, but in this approach, it handcuffs the user from having control or making it easy to do, in many cases, what are basic things (changing the title, URL segment, etc...). With the exception of the …
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    We chose Joomla! over Drupal or WordPress because it's in the middle ground between those two systems. We needed something that can be extended down the road if we need it, but at the same time, it can't be too complex. We felt Drupal is too complex and WordPress seems to be …
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    Joomla! is the #2 Open Source CMS behind WordPress, which we also use, and ahead of Drupal, which we have evaluated but decided not to pursue. Joomla! generally performs better than WP for clients that need more complexity to their websites, including flexibility in templating, …
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    I think Joomla is on-par with Drupal and Umbraco and similar platforms, but WordPress does seem to be above it. WordPress has become so common that there are more and more features becoming available to it that exceed the Joomla platform and make it hard to compete with. WordPre…
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    Joomla and Concrete5 have about the same capability and similar issues. Purchasing a SAAS like Squarespace, Weebly or Wix would be worth the price to remove the hassle of Joomla. A more robust free CMS like WordPress or Drupal would be a better solution if you wanted to remain …
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    Number one difference is the community. I can't stress it more. The joomla! community (both online, and offline) is extraordinarily friendly and accommodating. I have never heard of anyone who felt looked down upon or ridiculed for any type of question, request, or need. If …
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    WordPress and Drupal are all backed by corporate groups that don't foster the open source community which I want to support. Joomla! is non-profit and 100% volunteer based and the time I put into Joomla! outputs a better product for my clients and everyone else.
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    Joomla is one of the least intuitive options and has had some issues with updates in the past, as compared to WordPress. Magento has similar issues, but Joomla doesn't have as much flexibility as Magento (and of course, Joomla does not have e-commerce features built-in). …
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    Overall, I think Joomla! stacks up low compared to the above platforms, particularly through a lens of SEO and mobile responsiveness.
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    Joomla! is much easier than those products and with the strong support from Joomla! community and the availability of Joomla! plugins and extensions, then in my point of view, Joomla! is better. Also, Joomla! is very suitable for Portal and e-Commerce creation. Many features …
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    WordPress is the next competitor, a more complete and robust CMS, with extension solutions to add increased functionality. Well supported by the Joomla community, and strong contractor support for building site projects. It's not as programming friendly as Drupal, but a good …
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    After trying WordPress and Drupal, I've realized Joomla is the best middle ground CMS to use. It seems to solve every problem I've had for all sorts of websites. It has great e-commerce solutions, custom app solutions, social web platform solutions, etc. And the list goes on. …
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    Again, this was largely our clients decision, and a majority of the time based on our specific target audiences needs, Joomla was the best choice. If you were building a web solution that was primarily a blog, I'd likely recommend WordPress. If you were working with a very …
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla

    Before I settled in on using Joomla for the City of Pomona, I experimented with WordPress and Drupal, as being the right fit for the new website. Each time I went through the analysis, research and development, both WordPress and Drupal, came up short for quickly delivering a …

    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    We utilize Joomla! because it is open source, has one of the largest open source communities, and is flexible across all types and sizes of business environments. Joomla! also provides steady security updates which are installable from within the CMS (WordPress has been failing …
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    Joomla! is widely open and customizable whereas WordPress and Drupal have limits.
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla

    Joomla! can seem a little more complex to use than WordPress right out of the gate. However, that additional complexity brings with it immense power to add and customize the site to perform anything you want it to do. While WordPress is working to add more CMS capabilities with …

    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    Joomla! is great for large data applications such as sites that hold a large number of products. WordPress and Drupal have very clean and fluid front ends; however that lack the data driven power needed for online retailers. Joomla! sites can be made with responsive layouts and …
    Chose Joomla
    Client needed to upgrade their system from Joomla 1.x to the latest 3.X, only reason why I selected Joomla!. Made no sense in migrating to different CMS if the core was already done.
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    Drupal, compared to Joomla!, is even more customizable and flexible, and is even more modular. Joomla! reels the developer in a bit more and offers a less complicated way to get from start to finish. The outcome, of course, is that Drupal has a steeper learning curve and can …
    Incentivized
    Chose Joomla
    Joomla offers more but is harder to learn.
    Chose Joomla
    Joomla is much more organized, as far as content, than WordPress and the template customization is much more customizable with Joomla. With WordPress, you have to copy the theme, label it as a child, and configure sometimes over 10 files that make up the theme, plus, you can …
    Chose Joomla
    Joomla is universal solution, meaning it can suit any business with minimal customization. Wordpress was initially developed as blogging platform and it requires a lot more customization in order to fit other business models. Magento is an e-commerce platform. Only Drupal may …
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    76%
    Would buy again
    13 Answers
    93%
    Would buy again
    14 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    88%
    Delivers good value for the price
    14 Answers
    93%
    Delivers good value for the price
    13 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    76%
    Happy with the feature set
    13 Answers
    87%
    Happy with the feature set
    13 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    12 Answers
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    10 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    87%
    Implementation went as expected
    13 Answers
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    14 Answers
    Features
    Decap CMSDrupalJoomla
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Decap CMS and Drupal and Joomla!
    Feature
    Decap CMS
    -
    Ratings
    Drupal
    8.3
    74 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Joomla!
    8.3
    51 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.374 Ratings8.351 Ratings
    Platform & Infrastructure
    Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Decap CMS and Drupal and Joomla!
    Feature
    Decap CMS
    -
    Ratings
    Drupal
    7.8
    69 Ratings
    0% below category average
    Joomla!
    6.6
    48 Ratings
    17% below category average
    API00 Ratings7.364 Ratings7.246 Ratings
    Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings8.260 Ratings6.047 Ratings
    Web Content Creation
    Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Decap CMS and Drupal and Joomla!
    Feature
    Decap CMS
    -
    Ratings
    Drupal
    6.5
    78 Ratings
    19% below category average
    Joomla!
    7.7
    54 Ratings
    2% below category average
    WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings6.371 Ratings8.353 Ratings
    Code quality / cleanliness00 Ratings8.275 Ratings8.551 Ratings
    Admin section00 Ratings6.978 Ratings8.249 Ratings
    Page templates00 Ratings5.677 Ratings7.052 Ratings
    Library of website themes00 Ratings5.568 Ratings6.350 Ratings
    Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings6.572 Ratings7.550 Ratings
    Publishing workflow00 Ratings6.776 Ratings8.450 Ratings
    Form generator00 Ratings6.672 Ratings7.546 Ratings
    Web Content Management
    Comparison of Web Content Management features of Decap CMS and Drupal and Joomla!
    Feature
    Decap CMS
    -
    Ratings
    Drupal
    6.6
    77 Ratings
    13% below category average
    Joomla!
    7.6
    52 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Content taxonomy00 Ratings6.971 Ratings7.951 Ratings
    SEO support00 Ratings6.472 Ratings7.650 Ratings
    Bulk management00 Ratings6.467 Ratings8.049 Ratings
    Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings6.670 Ratings7.052 Ratings
    Community / comment management00 Ratings6.869 Ratings7.150 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Decap CMSDrupalJoomla
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    Umbraco CMS
    Score7 out of 10
    Umbraco CMS
    Score7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Square Online
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Square Online
    Score7.7 out of 10
    Enterprises
    No answers on this topic
    RWS Tridion Sites
    Score9 out of 10
    RWS Tridion Sites
    Score9 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Decap CMSDrupalJoomla
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.8
    (87 ratings)
    8.2
    (75 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (19 ratings)
    10.0
    (28 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.9
    (20 ratings)
    8.0
    (14 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.7
    (3 ratings)
    9.9
    (2 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.9
    (2 ratings)
    7.8
    (2 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (5 ratings)
    10.0
    (4 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    6.0
    (2 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.1
    (4 ratings)
    8.7
    (3 ratings)
    Ease of integration
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.9
    (3 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Decap CMSDrupalJoomla
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Netlify
    Netlify CMS is well suited when you have very less frequent updates to your content, maybe once a day and very few people need to access your data. You can connect it to Netlify, GitHub, or any platform and have multiple people access it and do as many updates as you wish, but the process is not well-defined and you need to build your own system for that. It is well suited for projects you need to pull off with very low cost, it is essentially free as the software is open source and free to use, and all you need to do is set up your schema correctly and find a deployment pipeline where you can build your static site/API to redeploy whenever the content changes. I personally used a GitHub Login -> Netlify CMS -> next app consumer of content -> GitHub pipelines to run next SSG -> GitHub Pages to deploy the built static site. It might not be appropriate for large teams where users themselves need no-code tools to modify the schema of the content.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    If you want to set up a basic Not For Profit (NFP) Membership system and content base, Word Press is easier than Drupal. However, if you have specific needs that require a fair bit of customisation then Drupal is the best CRM available. If the webmaster is confident with PHP and SQL, Drupal allows a lot of creativity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    The Joomla Project
    If your developers want to have some fun, Joomla offers the stability and friendliness to do custom coding. Certain marketing initiatives require us to get "cute" with the interface, and Joomla allows for that a bit easier than WordPress (and definitely easier than sites like Squarespace). The security of Joomla is also always a plus.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Netlify
    • Storing content data in customized schema without a database
    • Full control over your content and infrastructure where it is deployed and stored
    • Very low-cost way for building your own CMS and CDN
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Drag and drop functionality is easy to use
    • Easy to switch between straight text and HTML content
    • Ability to easily have multiple environments so that pages can be built in b/c-stage before they are approved and published
    • Solid user experience where it's clear how to navigate the platform
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    The Joomla Project
    • Security. Its got many new features in the new Joomla! 4 which make the already good security even better. I like the ability to use my Yubi keys to log in with the new webauth standard, I don't think any other CMS has that built in
    • W3C Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 (with AA compliance)
    • Really good SEO that gets our sites to the top of the search engines again without the need for any extra things
    • Speed, it gets a really good score (100%) in the google lighthouse on our server, can't beat that
    Read full review
    Cons
    Netlify
    • Linking between different schema types, i.e. having some relations between content
    • Better ways to define content schema, like how TinaCMS would handle using a JSON
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • This is not an easy CMS to work with if you don't have a good understanding of website development. It isn't "plug-and-play" like Wordpress or Shopify.
    • Over time, doing major updates to the system can be taxing, especially if you aren't well-versed enough in doing system updates in line with your "child" theme and code.
    • The CMS can become somewhat cumbersome with server resources if not carefully optimized while you build and customize it to your liking.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    The Joomla Project
    • Because Joomla's user community is smaller than WP, it lacks as many choices from 3rd party developers, meaning it can be a little more difficult to find the right extension for what you need to accomplish
    • Along the same vein, most of the best 3rd-party software for Joomla! is paid
    • Simple features such as Add to Menu and Cache cleaners should be adopted as part of the Joomla! core, though they are available as extensions
    • Joomla! could use a simpler and easier URL rewriting process
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Netlify
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    The time and money invested into this platform were too great to discontinue it at this point. I'm sure it will be in use for a while. We have also spent time training many employees how to use it. All of these things add up to quite an investment in the product. Lastly, it basically fulfills what we need our intranet site to do.
    Read full review
    The Joomla Project
    I gave it a rating of 10 because I just love how Joomla! works, how it is set up and how it handles many users. Also it is very fast, and there is no overload on the MySQL database or servers ever.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Netlify
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    As a team, we found Drupal to be highly customizable and flexible, allowing our development team to go to great lengths to develop desired functionalities. It can be used as a solution for all types of web projects. It comes with a robust admin interface that provides greater flexibility once the user gets acquainted with the system.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    The Joomla Project
    Joomla! 3.x is easily installed either manually or via a script provided by your host. It contains most of the tools needed to begin creating websites right from the start. Those features that it doesn't have are easily installed via links and buttons from the thousands of extensions available in the community
    Read full review
    Reliability and Availability
    Netlify
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    Drupal itself does not tend to have bugs that cause sporadic outages. When deployed on a well-configured LAMP stack, deployment and maintenance problems are minimal, and in general no exotic tuning or configuration is required. For highest uptime, putting a caching proxy like Varnish in front of Drupal (or a CDN that supports dynamic applications).
    Read full review
    The Joomla Project
    No answers on this topic
    Performance
    Netlify
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    Drupal page loads can be slow, as a great many database calls may be required to generate a page. It is highly recommended to use caching systems, both built-in and external to lessen such database loads and improve performance. I haven't had any problems with behind-the-scenes integrations with external systems.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    The Joomla Project
    Today's Modern Joomla performs very well and is robust and durable. The pages load faster than they ever did in the past and Modern Joomla's integration into other software or systems has become seamless. Modern Joomla sites will last long and will stay running forever.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Netlify
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    As noted earlier, the support of the community can be rather variable, with some modules attracting more attraction and action in their issue queues, but overall, the development community for Drupal is second to none. It probably the single greatest aspect of being involved in this open-source project.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    The Joomla Project
    Between the core Joomla developers who are excellent at answering questions and providing support, you have a whole community of developers who work with Joomla and are happy to help fellow developers out answering questions and supporting the Joomla project. Out of the many communities I am involved in for open-source software, Joomla's community is by far the best.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Netlify
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    I was part of the team that conducted the training. Our training was fine, but we could have been better informed on Drupal before we started providing it. If we did not have answers to tough questions, we had more technical staff we could consult with. We did provide hands-on practice time for the learners, which I would always recommend. That is where the best learning occurred.
    Read full review
    The Joomla Project
    No answers on this topic
    Online Training
    Netlify
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    The on-line training was not as ideal as the face-to-face training. It was done remotely and only allowed for the trainers to present information to the learners and demonstrate the platform online. There was not a good way to allow for the learners to practice, ask questions and have them answered all in the same session.
    Read full review
    The Joomla Project
    It is good if you know Joomla! if not it can get a bit confusing
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Netlify
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    Plan ahead as much you can. You really need to know how to build what you want with the modules available to you, or that you might need to code yourself, in order to make the best use of Drupal. I recommend you analyze the most technically difficult workflows and other aspects of your implementation, and try building some test versions of those first. Get feedback from stakeholders early and often, because you can easily find yourself in a situation where your implementation does 90% of what you want, but, due to something you didn't plan for, foresee, or know about, there's no feasible way to get past the last 10%
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    The Joomla Project
    Joomla has gone through tremendous growing pains. It is now better than ever. But before, when it was going from 1.5-2.5, the templates and plugins would break over and over again. If you don't understand what Joomla was trying to do back then, you might have a bad attitude toward it. Today, those pains are over and things don't break like they used to during that time period.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Netlify
    We really can't compare it to full-fledged CMS software, like WordPress, which has a lot of community and support with widgets, plugins, and whatnot. It's not built for that, but you can compare it to Contentful, Ghost, Strapi, etc., which provide similar functionality to a headless CMS with custom schema options, but even among them, it still lacks a lot of functionality, ease of use, and support. But Netlify CMS pros would be of the opinion that compared to other platforms where most schemas need to use their own tools and frameworks, it's very cost-effective. Something new called TinaCMS has come up to compete with Netlify CMS by covering most of its shortcomings, but it's something new being built by the same team that built Forestry CMS and comes with many modern features, yet currently only supports NextJS SSG.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    Drupal can be more complex to learn, but it offers a much wider range of applications. Drupal’s front and backend can be customized from design to functionality to allow for a wide range of uses. If someone wants to create something more complex than a simple site or blog, Drupal can be an amazing asset to have at hand.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    The Joomla Project
    We tested other platforms like WordPress, Magento and some local CMS. 
    But Joomla offered us better resources for generating content.
    Joomla is a CMS suitable for many types of projects, especially if you have several people editing content at the same time.
    It allows you to maintain visual standardization and offers many options for working with images.
    With its ability to control access to different articles, categories or even different components, it is a great tool, even if they are managed by different people.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Netlify
    No answers on this topic
    Open Source
    Drupal is well known to be scalable, although it requires solid knowledge of MySQL best practices, caching mechanisms, and other server-level best practices. I have never personally dealt with an especially large site, so I can speak well to the issues associated with Drupal scaling.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    The Joomla Project
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Netlify
    • Helped us inject dynamic content into existing site very quickly
    • Wasted a lot of time to implement when something complex, such as querying content, was needed
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Open Source
    • Given the endless possibilities that Drupal can have, we tend to have great support going on when we get a website launched
    • It has become much much faster and easier for us to launch a new project due to reusability
    • Configuration management in Drupal helps greatly with CI/CD, saves us costs
    Read full review
    The Joomla Project
    • Joomla has reduced our costs of rolling out a new website because it uses less developer time and can be rolled out by individual users as needed.
    • Joomla has a lot of extensions and add-ons that make it easy to create and implement advanced solutions quickly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots