Likelihood to Recommend DocuSign is useful for collecting electronic signatures on isolated documents and packets that are administered separately or integrated into another system. DocuSign is integrated into our onboarding system,
Paylocity , which is where the employee completes all onboarding tasks required for employment. Integrating DocuSign with
Paylocity allows us to send documents that require more than one signature along with other onboarding tasks, which makes for a less confusing onboarding experience for the worker. DocuSign also allows us to automatically run E-Verify from the integrated Form I-9 Document, which saves us lots of time onboarding each employee.
Read full review Kira is a great due diligence tool and can be well utilised on both large and small transactions. It also has good application if you are looking to compare multiple documents against a model form document or market standard templates. Kira is less useful if you are looking to review emails (e.g. as part of a disclosure exercise); or if your review involves non-Latin based script languages.
Read full review Pros Alerts when documents are signed Notifications if customers don't complete any or all of their required tasks Showing clients exactly where to sign Making signing easy and fast Read full review UI/UX - tagging and naming feels much easier than you'd expect machine learning to feel Accuracy - Kira's built-in models perform well out of the box Assistance - Kira's support team gets back to me same day if I have a question Read full review Cons Increase sending limit for initial plans Faster return for client service requests When correcting a document, no new email is sent for notification of an update. The clients have to go back to the old document, and it feels uncomfortable for them. Read full review Inability to relabel smart fields to suit the review process means it is hard to align it to particular projects (e.g. it would be useful to relabel the "Assignment" smart field as "Is the contract assignable?") Not enough non-English smart fields. Needs the ability to resell user-trained smart fields in a marketplace. Output is not customizable enough. Built-in analysis tools are useful but a little basic. Read full review Usability If our firm had more contracts in English, the usability of Kira would be rated higher. However, since we have to train clauses in Portuguese in order to use Kira, it makes its usability lower. We still are not able to fully use Kira for reading contracts in Portuguese. It takes a long time and many associate hours to make Kira usable in other languages.
Read full review Support Rating I am constantly experiencing issues with SpringCM.
Read full review Customer Support is excellent. The online help portal is probably the best I have ever seen. Great videos with content easily found. The HelpLine is staffed by knowledgeable people. The videos have saved us providing a lot of in-house training, which we would struggle to resource. The account managers really know the product and their law firm clients and share best practices and trends.
Read full review Alternatives Considered Adobe Acrobat Sign was a more confusing process compared to DocuSign CLM.
Acrobat presented signature abilities, yet sometimes this was electronic and sometimes this was done manually. Additionally, it is difficult to send and track the document when it goes to more than one signatory.
Read full review Kira offers a lot more out of the box than other providers and is also more flexible around integrations. This, plus the clear pricing structure, is why we went for it instead of (or as well as) others. Diligen, RAVN, Leverton, Della, Seal not in list.
Read full review Return on Investment Positive - has helped us track renewals which allows us to get out of "bad" contracts or renew "good" ones. Negative - we had hoped for it to help us determine which terms and conditions we have agreed to in other contracts. This has made contract review remain a lengthy process. Positive - We are now able to find all of our contracts which has helped us get out of unnecessary contracts (which positively impacts finances). Read full review Positive ROI: Increased comfort level of attorneys and use of tech Neutral ROI: It has not significantly change how we handle projects, since there still is a need for manual review Negative ROI: It has been cost prohibitive to scale it Read full review ScreenShots