TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    eClincher

    Score7.9 out of 10
    N/AeClincher aims to be the most powerful, complete and intuitive social media management software. According to the vendor, the product is designed to help users, businesses, and agencies manage social media presence with one platform, and offers the following capabilities: advanced publishing publishing automation (queues, RSS feeds, recycle evergreen content) engagement with unified social inbox & live social feeds monitoring content…

    $149

    per month

    Pulsar CORE

    Score10 out of 10
    N/APulsar is a social media monitoring platform offering social listening, owned channels analytics, and social CRM. Customers use Pulsar for brand tracking and campaign measurement. The platform includes 4 tools: TRAC: Social media listening across topics, audiences and content diffusion. CORE: Owned channels analytics to measure your content performance and audience growth. FLOW: Social customer relationship management and social media publishing. TEAM: Analyse your internal social networks…

    $1,200

    150,000 mentions

    Pricing
    eClincherPulsar CORE
    Editions & Modules
    Standard
    $149
    per month
    Professional
    $349
    per month
    Enterprise
    Contact Vendor
    TRAC (starter package)
    $1,200
    150,000 mentions
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    eClincherPulsar CORE
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsA discount is offered for annual billing.Prices listed are on a 'starting from' basis. All TRAC packages have unlimited user log-ins, unlimited search queries and are charged on the amount of mentions pulled in. Bespoke packages are available.
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    eClincherPulsar CORE
    Listening/monitoring
    Comparison of Listening/monitoring features of eClincher and Pulsar CORE
    Feature
    eClincher
    7.0
    5 Ratings
    9% below category average
    Pulsar CORE
    -
    Ratings
    Boolean keyword searches7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Filtering out noise/spam7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Broad channel coverage7.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Publishing
    Comparison of Publishing features of eClincher and Pulsar CORE
    Feature
    eClincher
    6.0
    6 Ratings
    30% below category average
    Pulsar CORE
    -
    Ratings
    Content planning and scheduling8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Audience targeting1.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content optimization9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow management6.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Engagement
    Comparison of Engagement features of eClincher and Pulsar CORE
    Feature
    eClincher
    6.3
    5 Ratings
    25% below category average
    Pulsar CORE
    -
    Ratings
    Automated routing and prioritization7.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customer interaction histories4.83 Ratings00 Ratings
    Bulk actions7.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Marketing
    Comparison of Marketing features of eClincher and Pulsar CORE
    Feature
    eClincher
    1.0
    3 Ratings
    154% below category average
    Pulsar CORE
    -
    Ratings
    Lead generation1.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Content marketing1.13 Ratings00 Ratings
    Channel coverage/integration
    Comparison of Channel coverage/integration features of eClincher and Pulsar CORE
    Feature
    eClincher
    6.8
    6 Ratings
    20% below category average
    Pulsar CORE
    -
    Ratings
    Twitter7.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Facebook8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    LinkedIn6.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Google+9.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Instagram8.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pinterest8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    YouTube1.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting/analytics
    Comparison of Reporting/analytics features of eClincher and Pulsar CORE
    Feature
    eClincher
    4.0
    6 Ratings
    64% below category average
    Pulsar CORE
    -
    Ratings
    Campaign success analytics4.05 Ratings00 Ratings
    Real-time tracking4.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Account management
    Comparison of Account management features of eClincher and Pulsar CORE
    Feature
    eClincher
    4.5
    6 Ratings
    55% below category average
    Pulsar CORE
    -
    Ratings
    Role-based user permissions & privileges8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile access1.16 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    eClincherPulsar CORE
    Small Businesses
    Sendible
    Score7.2 out of 10
    Mention
    Score8 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Emplifi
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Mention
    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Salesforce Marketing Cloud Social Studio (discontinued)
    Score8.1 out of 10
    Social Suite by Reputation.com
    Score9.4 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    eClincherPulsar CORE
    Likelihood to Recommend
    1.0
    (6 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    1.0
    (2 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    eClincherPulsar CORE
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Eclincher
    Best suited for a marketer that cares about reports, needs a social media management platform and doesn't want to pay more for a more aesthetically pleasing version of a platform with the same or less functionality, such as Hootsuite or Sprout Social. For a social media marketer that wants to automate some of their postings, the queues feature is great for this functionality. Not best suited for beginners to social media, as their platform is best utilized with someone familiar with the industry that knows what they are doing. Their chat support team is very good though, but this type of individual might find themselves spending a lot of time on the platform.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pulsar
    I think that Pulsar is a good tool for brands or agencies who have a set list of competitors or subbrands that they are looking to do a monthly/weekly comparison of engagement metrics. When you have the brand account inputted, the data is shown in a visually tangible way and easy to comprehend.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Eclincher
    • eClincher supports nearly every social network and connects to a large number of sources (blogs, bit.ly, Google Analytics, Google My Business). This makes workflow tremendously easy.
    • Posting Groups. At higher levels of service, eClincher allows you to set-up individual brand accounts. My agency isn't at that level, so we utilize eClincher's posting groups to make 1-click groups that post to all of the profiles for each client. This allows us to quickly post a cohesive message across all channels.
    • Workflow management: eClincher adds plenty of additional tools to make your workflow fast. Connections to free stock photo services make it easy to add generic pictures to your content. Google Analytics and bit.ly can keep track of statistics and measure success. The Inbox allows you to handle all your clients' accounts from one screen (including comments, messages, reviews, and more). The Feeds and Influencers tabs allow you to understand your market and what's being said. Altogether, eClincher makes a 1-app solution for Social Media Management.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pulsar
    • Track engagements over time
    • Easy to use interface
    • Modern and updated display
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Eclincher
    • It's not very visually appealing, but this is not a dealbreaker.
    • The reporting features could definitely use some work. I still get more value from the native SNS pages, but this is quickly changing. They removed the "export to CSV" functionality, but they plan to reintroduce it soon. As mentioned previously, they really respond to criticism well and update the tool constantly.
    • The inbox could use some work. I don't like being directed offsite to view certain comments deemed "requests for further info" when they could just easily display them there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pulsar
    • Unfortunately, when exporting data it is often hard to read in an easy format.
    • I've used other tools where you can get historical data once you put into the tool but Pulsar cannot do that.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Eclincher
    Unless the price of eClincher moves to a point where it is too much to justify, I don't see any reason why we wouldn't continue to use eClincher for our agency. The value at this price-point is unbelievable and we'd be foolish to move to a pricier program purely for the sake of slicker graphics or UI. eClinchers pricing is fantastic, and is only matched by its functionality—it matches or beats any of the major Social Media Manager SaaS programs out there for a fraction of the cost. This tool is great for growing agencies, but would also be useful for any marketing department or large agency that wants to streamline their social media workflow.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pulsar
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    Eclincher
    Its usability was good until they changed their plans and stopped their LTD program for its early adopters who helped raise the tool by giving it positive reviews. I don't think eClincher is ethical in any sense based on the recent actions.
    Read full review
    Pulsar
    Pulsar is not a complex tool by any means. The interface is updated and comprehensive, and I've used multiple tools in the past where the interface was very outdated and exporting data was often a difficult process since it was not well organized. The tool works well in visualizing complex data.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Eclincher
    [In my experience,] due to the fact that they did a bait and switch on their plans and blamed AppSumo for the lifetime program ending is simply wrong. [I believe that] it's unethical to get support and reviews from their early adopters then take the plan away later.
    Read full review
    Pulsar
    I have not had to reach out to Pulsar support before but my coworkers have and said the support was good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Eclincher
    Be patient. eClincher isn't perfect and has some software issues. These issues will be exacerbated if you get frustrated or have a slow connection. If something "breaks" or locks up, just refresh the page and re-do that step. It may take your team a couple weeks to get use to using the new system. Once they've gotten the hang of it, I'm sure they'll love the amount of time they save. I'd recommend taking your time with the set-up. Though there aren't a lot of steps to get everything squared away, you can break the process into small chunks to make sure you're managing your time. To just hook-up all the social accounts, it may only take an hour or so. But, if you want to set-up all the extra tools (such as user accounts, listening feeds, posting groups, schedules, etc.) it'll take longer. I think it took around a day to set-up completely, but your mileage my vary.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pulsar
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Eclincher
    There are loads of social scheduling tools out there. I was using Buffer but then found it was limited in terms of listening and reporting so I started to look at a more professional software. I tried Hootsuite but hated the interface, way too busy with the primary focus being on feeds rather than scheduling. Sprout Social I found clunky and hard to use. eClincher was recommended to me by a friend. I think the interface (desktop and mobile) is easy to use but what sets it apart is its support - the live chat is brilliant.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pulsar
    I think that Pulsar is one of the more updated platforms that I have used and the metrics exported/shown in the dashboard are accurate. I think that some tools report inaccurate metrics gathered from social media platforms due to the new APIs, something that often causes confusion and lack of clarity.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Eclincher
    • Makes it much easier to manage our social publishing
    • Makes it much easier to manage our social engagement
    • Makes it much easier to manage our social reporting
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pulsar
    • Input into our algorithm for brand strength and stature
    • Quick engagement tracking
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    eClincher Screenshots

    Screenshot of eClincher Publishing/Draft workspaceScreenshot of eClincher Inbox/Assignment/Tags workspaceScreenshot of eClincher Analytics workspaceScreenshot of eClincher Reporting workspaceScreenshot of eClincher Content Curation workspace

    Pulsar CORE Screenshots

    Screenshot of The activity dashboard gives you a thorough snapshot of all the key numbers in your datasetScreenshot of Pulsar TRAC advanced location detection gives you up to 100% geo-localised data by city, country and GPS coordinatesScreenshot of The Network map visualizes the engagement patterns within your audience and identifies the most influential usersScreenshot of Slice and dice the data with contextual, behavioural and content filtersScreenshot of See the bigger picture. Pulsar CORE gives you integrated brand-level metrics across all owned channels, so you can measure the total reach and engagement you're getting.