EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server vs. SAP HANA Cloud
EDB Postgres Advanced Server vs. IBM Netezza Performance Server vs. SAP HANA Cloud
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
EDB Postgres Advanced Server | N/A | The EDB Postgres Advanced Server is an advanced deployment of the PostgreSQL relational database with greater features and Oracle compatibility, from EnterpriseDB headquartered in Bedford, Massachusetts. | N/A | |
![]() IBM Netezza Performance Server | N/A | Netezza Performance Server (NPS) is an add-on data warehouse solution available on Cloud Pak for Data System platform, built over open source and optimized for High Performance Analytics with built-in hardware acceleration. Netezza Performance Server was previously named IBM Performance Server for PostgreSQL (IPS). | N/A | |
SAP HANA Cloud | N/A | SAP HANA is an application that uses in-memory database technology to process very large amounts of real-time data from relational databases, both SAP and non-SAP, in a very short time. The in-memory computing engine allows HANA to process data stored in RAM as opposed to reading it from a disk which means that the data can be accessed in real time by the applications using HANA. The product is sold both as an appliance and as a cloud-based software solution. | $0.95 per month Capacity Units |
| EDB Postgres Advanced Server | IBM Netezza Performance Server | SAP HANA Cloud | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | Optional | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | Includes a one year free trial. | |||||||||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| EDB Postgres Advanced Server | IBM Netezza Performance Server | SAP HANA Cloud |
|---|
| EDB Postgres Advanced Server | IBM Netezza Performance Server | SAP HANA Cloud | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relational Databases |
|
| EDB Postgres Advanced Server | IBM Netezza Performance Server | SAP HANA Cloud | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | InterSystems IRIS Score 8.0 out of 10 | Google BigQuery Score 8.8 out of 10 | InterSystems IRIS Score 8.0 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | InterSystems IRIS Score 8.0 out of 10 | Cloudera Enterprise Data Hub Score 9.0 out of 10 | InterSystems IRIS Score 8.0 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SAP IQ Score 10.0 out of 10 | Oracle Exadata Score 9.8 out of 10 | SAP IQ Score 10.0 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| EDB Postgres Advanced Server | IBM Netezza Performance Server | SAP HANA Cloud | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 (2 ratings) | 9.3 (6 ratings) | 9.6 (308 ratings) |
| Likelihood to Renew | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | 10.0 (11 ratings) |
| Usability | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | 9.6 (29 ratings) |
| Availability | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | 3.6 (1 ratings) |
| Performance | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | 3.6 (1 ratings) |
| Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (251 ratings) |
| Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | 9.1 (2 ratings) |
| Configurability | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | 3.6 (1 ratings) |
| Ease of integration | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | 4.5 (1 ratings) |
| Product Scalability | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | 4.5 (1 ratings) |
| Vendor post-sale | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | 4.5 (1 ratings) |
| Vendor pre-sale | - (0 ratings) | - (0 ratings) | 3.6 (1 ratings) |
| EDB Postgres Advanced Server | IBM Netezza Performance Server | SAP HANA Cloud | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | ![]() EnterpriseDB
| ![]() IBM
| SAP
|
| Pros | ![]() EnterpriseDB
| ![]() IBM
| SAP
|
| Cons | ![]() EnterpriseDB
| ![]() IBM
| SAP
|
| Likelihood to Renew | ![]() EnterpriseDB No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM No answers on this topic | SAP
|
| Usability | ![]() EnterpriseDB No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM No answers on this topic | SAP
|
| Reliability and Availability | ![]() EnterpriseDB No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM No answers on this topic | SAP
|
| Performance | ![]() EnterpriseDB No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM No answers on this topic | SAP
|
| Support Rating | ![]() EnterpriseDB No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM No answers on this topic | SAP
|
| Implementation Rating | ![]() EnterpriseDB No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM No answers on this topic | SAP
|
| Alternatives Considered | ![]() EnterpriseDB
| ![]() IBM
| SAP
|
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | ![]() EnterpriseDB No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM No answers on this topic | SAP
|
| Scalability | ![]() EnterpriseDB No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM No answers on this topic | SAP
|
| Professional Services | ![]() EnterpriseDB No answers on this topic | ![]() IBM No answers on this topic | SAP
|
| Return on Investment | ![]() EnterpriseDB
| ![]() IBM
| SAP
|
| ScreenShots |







