Emptoris vs. Zip Intake-to-Procure

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Emptoris
Score 5.5 out of 10
N/A
N/A
$59
Per User Per Month
Zip Intake-to-Procure
Score 7.8 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private.N/A
Pricing
EmptorisZip Intake-to-Procure
Editions & Modules
Emptoris
$59.00
Per User Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
EmptorisZip Intake-to-Procure
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
EmptorisZip Intake-to-Procure
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
Emptoris
8.3
4 Ratings
1% above category average
Zip Intake-to-Procure
-
Ratings
Contract creation9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract templates7.84 Ratings00 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
Guided logic8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Emptoris
7.9
4 Ratings
5% below category average
Zip Intake-to-Procure
-
Ratings
Contract sharing8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract editing8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts7.53 Ratings00 Ratings
MS Word plug-in7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Approval process8.24 Ratings00 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows7.84 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Emptoris
7.8
5 Ratings
8% below category average
Zip Intake-to-Procure
-
Ratings
Contract database7.75 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract search7.55 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom contract reports7.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Tracking contract status8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance check7.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
EmptorisZip Intake-to-Procure
Small Businesses
PandaDoc
PandaDoc
Score 9.0 out of 10
MIP Fund Accounting
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
PandaDoc
PandaDoc
Score 9.0 out of 10
Esker
Esker
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
DocuSign CLM
DocuSign CLM
Score 8.5 out of 10
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Score 7.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
EmptorisZip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend
8.1
(15 ratings)
7.6
(22 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(10 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(2 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
EmptorisZip Intake-to-Procure
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
If you have a highly bureaucratic organization that is heavily focused on procurement, Emptoris can provide some value. It seemed to be very good at linking the contract information to procurement for better spend control. If you are trying to implement a standalone contract management solution that allows you to easily create contracts and store them in a central location, this isn't the tool for you. There doesn't appear to be a simplified implementation. In general, when a SaaS solution has a complicated and expensive implementation, I am very skeptical. This does not show that the vendor is trying to move customers forward on a single code base. If that many things need to be done during implementation, you are starting to customize the solution for every customer. This hurts the vendor's ability to scale and make improvements in the future.
Read full review
Zip
Zip can be used for routing all vendor-level approvals for new vendors and all renewals across our organization. It can also be helpful for managing all purchases from existing vendors. For non-spend related approvals, it’s not as well suited. Zip was definitely designed for procurement workflows. They also have a vendor management portal that links up directly to something like NetSuite for management and visibility.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Document protection - the Check Out contract feature is a great way to allow external parties to make modifications to contract language without the ability to accept those changes. Those redlines can then be imported back into Emptoris and reviewed or further modified as needed.
  • Notifications & reminders - you can trigger an email manually from within the system, or you can configure automated notifications andreminders to alert users when a new task is received or has aged a given amount of days, etc.
  • Interview wizard - there is a lot of value in the interview wizard. Administrators can configure screens with selecting options via check boxes, radio buttons, or typed-in values. Variables and conditions can be used to selectively populate fields within the contract or apply other options, making for a quick and convenient method to generate contracts conforming to corporate standards.
  • Field customization - administrators can customize a list of options for various fields including contract substatus, address type, and user created business term variables.
  • Approvals - many different options are available to configure approvals to trigger automatically upon presenting and/or executing the contract including specific individuals, one or more approver groups, or based upon various criteria including terms within the contract, type of contract, or the contract's owning organization.
Read full review
Zip
  • No coding - Ability for the administrator to make changes without development resources helps us be agile as a procurement org.
  • Visibility to the user in a great user interface
  • Accountability (helps us track SLAs on response time), Audit trails keeping track of everything
  • The implementation team was incredible, as is ongoing support. They want you to succeed in your goals vs. just implement their tool
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • Reporting, Emptoris comes with standard reports which can not always can be fit into our business. This needs to be improved. I hope Emptoris is addressing this issue in their latest releases.
  • Though the feature of editing language in MS word is excellent, loading MS word takes time.
Read full review
Zip
  • There are some duplicated fields such as anticipated total spend vs. price line item breakdown that asks for the same thing. This is a little bit tedious
  • Does not show which invoices got processed and applied to open POs
  • Does not integrate / migrate special custom fields within Zip Intake-to-Procure into other tech stacks (NetSuite)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
There are a lot of new, exciting products coming out in every field and I believe that there is always something better right over the horizon. If it was my choice, I would review my usage of Emptoris and other software periodically to make sure I'm using the most efficient software possible.
Read full review
Zip
No answers on this topic
Usability
IBM
Emptoris is a pretty robust tool overall. Learning curve is small and it is simple to use
Read full review
Zip
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
The above rating for the overall support from Emptoris is for their product / product support, roll out training and refresher training / ongoing training, which is not only good but superior. There is no major or reconizable bad review that can be given to Emptoris at this point in time, from where is stands.
Read full review
Zip
Incredibly responsive and helpful.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
I am a fan of Ariba to be used for the entire lifecycle of Sourcing. From RFX's to cutting PO's. I feel Emptoris misses the boat on the idea of a "One Stop Shop" for all of your Sourcing/Purchasing needs
Read full review
Zip
I prefer Zip for its for its user-friendly interface and ease of adoption, especially if the organization values a simpler and more intuitive system for users across various departments. Comparatively, Zip is a more budget-friendly solution compared to some enterprise-level systems like SAP ARIBA or Oracle PeopleSoft, especially for smaller or mid-sized organizations with specific procurement needs.
Read full review
Return on Investment
IBM
  • We won the 2005 Baseline Magazine Award for best ROI related to a technology implementation with an ROI 5544% (see 2005 Baseline ROI Awards, GlaxoSmithkline).
  • We always felt we could do "two times the work, with half the people and deliver double the savings".
Read full review
Zip
  • Visibility for all necessary approvers and reviewers of the process.
  • Lack of open API to other systems (i.e Mondays, Smartsheet) is causing concerns for team that might want to move away from current tool.
  • No 3rd party implementation required is huge cost / time savings.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Zip supports ultra-configurable, parallel workflows with our no-code configuration.Screenshot of Zip also integrates with all major ticketing, CLM, GRC, and ERP/P2P solutions. Here's an example integration card for JIRA.Screenshot of Zip has an optional vendor-facing portal for the vendor to provide diligence materials, including documents, surveys, and even bank settlement information.Screenshot of Zip's vendor-facing portal includes an optional bank settlement form with an attestation.