TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Emptoris

    Score5.5 out of 10
    N/AN/A

    $59

    Per User Per Month

    Zip Intake-to-Procure

    Score7.9 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Zip provides a place for employees to initiate a purchase or vendor request. Each request is routed for approval across procurement, finance, IT, data security, legal, and other teams, and Zip integrates into ERP and P2P solutions to create a PR or draft PO. The vendor states Zip works with Canva, Checkr, Hopin, Zapier, CM Group, and other companies both public and private.N/A
    Pricing
    EmptorisZip Intake-to-Procure
    Editions & Modules
    Emptoris
    $59.00
    Per User Per Month
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    EmptorisZip Intake-to-Procure
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    EmptorisZip Intake-to-Procure
    Considered Both Products
    IBM
    No answer on this topic
    Zip
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Would buy again
    22 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    22 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    22 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    17 Answers
    Features
    EmptorisZip Intake-to-Procure
    Contract Authoring
    Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Emptoris and Zip Intake-to-Procure
    Feature
    Emptoris
    8.3
    4 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Zip Intake-to-Procure
    -
    Ratings
    Contract creation9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract templates7.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Clause library/saved fields8.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Guided logic8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract Collaboration
    Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Emptoris and Zip Intake-to-Procure
    Feature
    Emptoris
    7.9
    4 Ratings
    4% below category average
    Zip Intake-to-Procure
    -
    Ratings
    Contract sharing8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract editing8.74 Ratings00 Ratings
    Collaborating on contracts7.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    MS Word plug-in7.52 Ratings00 Ratings
    Approval process8.24 Ratings00 Ratings
    Interdepartmental workflows7.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract Monitoring
    Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Emptoris and Zip Intake-to-Procure
    Feature
    Emptoris
    7.8
    5 Ratings
    5% below category average
    Zip Intake-to-Procure
    -
    Ratings
    Contract database7.75 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract search7.55 Ratings00 Ratings
    Contract milestone reminders & alerts8.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom contract reports7.44 Ratings00 Ratings
    Tracking contract status8.44 Ratings00 Ratings
    Compliance check7.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    EmptorisZip Intake-to-Procure
    Small Businesses
    DocuSign CLM
    Score8.2 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    Conga CLM
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Precoro
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Conga CLM
    Score8.8 out of 10
    GEP Quantum Intelligence
    Score9.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    EmptorisZip Intake-to-Procure
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.1
    (15 ratings)
    7.7
    (22 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (10 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Usability
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    9.1
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    EmptorisZip Intake-to-Procure
    Likelihood to Recommend
    IBM
    If you have a highly bureaucratic organization that is heavily focused on procurement, Emptoris can provide some value. It seemed to be very good at linking the contract information to procurement for better spend control. If you are trying to implement a standalone contract management solution that allows you to easily create contracts and store them in a central location, this isn't the tool for you. There doesn't appear to be a simplified implementation. In general, when a SaaS solution has a complicated and expensive implementation, I am very skeptical. This does not show that the vendor is trying to move customers forward on a single code base. If that many things need to be done during implementation, you are starting to customize the solution for every customer. This hurts the vendor's ability to scale and make improvements in the future.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    Zip can be used for routing all vendor-level approvals for new vendors and all renewals across our organization. It can also be helpful for managing all purchases from existing vendors. For non-spend related approvals, it’s not as well suited. Zip was definitely designed for procurement workflows. They also have a vendor management portal that links up directly to something like NetSuite for management and visibility.
    Read full review
    Pros
    IBM
    • Document protection - the Check Out contract feature is a great way to allow external parties to make modifications to contract language without the ability to accept those changes. Those redlines can then be imported back into Emptoris and reviewed or further modified as needed.
    • Notifications & reminders - you can trigger an email manually from within the system, or you can configure automated notifications andreminders to alert users when a new task is received or has aged a given amount of days, etc.
    • Interview wizard - there is a lot of value in the interview wizard. Administrators can configure screens with selecting options via check boxes, radio buttons, or typed-in values. Variables and conditions can be used to selectively populate fields within the contract or apply other options, making for a quick and convenient method to generate contracts conforming to corporate standards.
    • Field customization - administrators can customize a list of options for various fields including contract substatus, address type, and user created business term variables.
    • Approvals - many different options are available to configure approvals to trigger automatically upon presenting and/or executing the contract including specific individuals, one or more approver groups, or based upon various criteria including terms within the contract, type of contract, or the contract's owning organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    • No coding - Ability for the administrator to make changes without development resources helps us be agile as a procurement org.
    • Visibility to the user in a great user interface
    • Accountability (helps us track SLAs on response time), Audit trails keeping track of everything
    • The implementation team was incredible, as is ongoing support. They want you to succeed in your goals vs. just implement their tool
    Read full review
    Cons
    IBM
    • Reporting, Emptoris comes with standard reports which can not always can be fit into our business. This needs to be improved. I hope Emptoris is addressing this issue in their latest releases.
    • Though the feature of editing language in MS word is excellent, loading MS word takes time.
    Read full review
    Zip
    • There are some duplicated fields such as anticipated total spend vs. price line item breakdown that asks for the same thing. This is a little bit tedious
    • Does not show which invoices got processed and applied to open POs
    • Does not integrate / migrate special custom fields within Zip Intake-to-Procure into other tech stacks (NetSuite)
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    IBM
    There are a lot of new, exciting products coming out in every field and I believe that there is always something better right over the horizon. If it was my choice, I would review my usage of Emptoris and other software periodically to make sure I'm using the most efficient software possible.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    No answers on this topic
    Usability
    IBM
    Emptoris is a pretty robust tool overall. Learning curve is small and it is simple to use
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    IBM
    The above rating for the overall support from Emptoris is for their product / product support, roll out training and refresher training / ongoing training, which is not only good but superior. There is no major or reconizable bad review that can be given to Emptoris at this point in time, from where is stands.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    Incredibly responsive and helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    IBM
    I am a fan of Ariba to be used for the entire lifecycle of Sourcing. From RFX's to cutting PO's. I feel Emptoris misses the boat on the idea of a "One Stop Shop" for all of your Sourcing/Purchasing needs
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    I prefer Zip for its for its user-friendly interface and ease of adoption, especially if the organization values a simpler and more intuitive system for users across various departments. Comparatively, Zip is a more budget-friendly solution compared to some enterprise-level systems like SAP ARIBA or Oracle PeopleSoft, especially for smaller or mid-sized organizations with specific procurement needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    IBM
    • We won the 2005 Baseline Magazine Award for best ROI related to a technology implementation with an ROI 5544% (see 2005 Baseline ROI Awards, GlaxoSmithkline).
    • We always felt we could do "two times the work, with half the people and deliver double the savings".
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Zip
    • Visibility for all necessary approvers and reviewers of the process.
    • Lack of open API to other systems (i.e Mondays, Smartsheet) is causing concerns for team that might want to move away from current tool.
    • No 3rd party implementation required is huge cost / time savings.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Zip Intake-to-Procure Screenshots

    Product screenshotScreenshot of Zip supports ultra-configurable, parallel workflows with our no-code configuration.Screenshot of Zip also integrates with all major ticketing, CLM, GRC, and ERP/P2P solutions. Here's an example integration card for JIRA.Screenshot of Zip has an optional vendor-facing portal for the vendor to provide diligence materials, including documents, surveys, and even bank settlement information.Screenshot of Zip's vendor-facing portal includes an optional bank settlement form with an attestation.