Epicor CPQ vs. PandaDoc
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Epicor CPQ | Score6 out of 10 | N/A | Epicor CPQ, formerly KBMax, is an interactive 3D UI CPQ solution that enables customers and sales users to configure simple or complex products on any device, now from Epicor since the May, 2021 acquisition. | N/A |
PandaDoc | Score8.5 out of 10 | N/A | PandaDoc headquartered in San Francisco offers their eponymous electronic signature platform for sales teams, containing sales proposal automation and CPQ (configure, price, quote) features, and integration with CRMs. | $35 per month per seat |
| Epicor CPQ | PandaDoc | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | PandaDoc offers a free eSign plan and 3 paid packages for eSigning and document automation. All plans include unlimited documents and eSignatures. Evaluations start with a free 14-day trial. Up to a 46% discount for annual pricing. | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Epicor CPQ | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Would buy again 222 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Delivers good value for the price 204 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Happy with the feature set 221 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 174 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Implementation went as expected 182 Answers | |
| Epicor CPQ | PandaDoc | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPQ |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Epicor CPQ | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | QuoteWerks Score9.7 out of 10 | BoldSign, by Syncfusion Score10 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | QuoteWerks Score9.7 out of 10 | OneSpan Sign Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Agentforce Revenue Management Score8.6 out of 10 | DocuSign Score8.7 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Epicor CPQ | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 8.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.1 |
| Usability | - | 8.3 |
| Availability | - | 9.1 |
| Performance | - | 9.6 |
| Support Rating | - | 6.1 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 6.3 |
| Configurability | - | 2.8 |
| Ease of integration | - | 9.0 |
| Product Scalability | - | 8.6 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 9.7 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 6.7 |
| Epicor CPQ | PandaDoc | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Performance | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | PandaDoc Screenshots |








