Epicor Eclipse is an end-to-end business system for wholesale distributors, as well as electrical, HVAC, plumbing and PVF businesses. Eclipse simplifies complex distribution processes found in today’s dynamic supply chains.
N/A
Microsoft Azure
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Azure is a cloud computing platform and infrastructure for building, deploying, and managing applications and services through a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters.
$29
per month
Pricing
Epicor Eclipse
Microsoft Azure
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Developer
$29
per month
Standard
$100
per month
Professional Direct
$1000
per month
Basic
Free
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Epicor Eclipse
Microsoft Azure
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
The free tier lets users have access to a variety of services free for 12 months with limited usage after making an Azure account.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Epicor Eclipse
Microsoft Azure
Features
Epicor Eclipse
Microsoft Azure
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
8.5
3 Ratings
14% above category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
8.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
1.0
10 Ratings
153% below category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
1.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
1.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
3.0
15 Ratings
94% below category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
1.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
5.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
1.0
17 Ratings
152% below category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
Dashboards
1.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
1.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
1.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
6.4
16 Ratings
18% below category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
6.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
6.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
6.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
6.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
6.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
6.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
5.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
3.2
18 Ratings
85% below category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
2.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
2.016 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
2.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
5.0
18 Ratings
44% below category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
Pricing
3.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
6.018 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
5.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
2.017 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
5.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
5.9
14 Ratings
24% below category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
Billing Management
5.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
5.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
1.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
1.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
5.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
5.7
9 Ratings
28% below category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
6.86 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
7.26 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
6.26 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
6.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
7.75 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
6.4
6 Ratings
9% below category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
6.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
5.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
6.42 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
6.2
3 Ratings
18% below category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
1.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
5.6
10 Ratings
22% below category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
5.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
5.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
1.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
5.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
5.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
4.5
4 Ratings
38% below category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
2.72 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
6.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
4.51 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
4.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
3.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
4.2
12 Ratings
48% below category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
4.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
4.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
4.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
4.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
2.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
5.0
3 Ratings
39% below category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
4.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
5.73 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
6.41 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
5.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
4.83 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
4.1
14 Ratings
54% below category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
Forecasting
5.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
5.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
2.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Epicor Eclipse
6.2
7 Ratings
16% below category average
Microsoft Azure
-
Ratings
Proposal Management
5.93 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Master Data Management
6.43 Ratings
00 Ratings
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
Comparison of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) features of Product A and Product B
Eclipse is well suited for quick order entry where the source is a formal purchase order document or a phone call with a known customer. In these scenarios the order entry process is quick, and order processing is smooth even if the customer has a lot of "special" requests like shipping part today and holding the rest or shipping some of the order to other addresses. Eclipse also works well if you have a good database of products, especially in searching for products where only partial information is known or finding existing orders where all you know for sure is the customer. It is not particularly well suited for Point of Sale where a walk-in customer who doesn't have an account wants products for which part numbers are not known, due to the requirements to release an order for a customer with no credit.
Azure is particularly well suited for enterprise environments with existing Microsoft investments, those that require robust compliance features, and organizations that need hybrid cloud capabilities that bridge on-premises and cloud infrastructure. In my opinion, Azure is less appropriate for cost-sensitive startups or small businesses without dedicated cloud expertise and scenarios requiring edge computing use cases with limited connectivity. Azure offers comprehensive solutions for most business needs but can feel like there is a higher learning curve than other cloud-based providers, depending on the product and use case.
Sales Order tracking, even returns are strengths of Epicor Eclipse. It can be set up to match returns to previous orders so that the correct credits are applied. It is capable of setting up contract pricing as well as matrix level pricing according to sales velocity or individual customer buyer programs.
Purchasing can be set up to work by full line buys or short buys while still maintaining a balanced inventory level of vendor line product.
Vendor Invoices and purchase orders are easily matched up for payment and the diverse reporting features are able to provide multi-faceted views of Product Sales, Items with No Sales, or Sales or Purchasing trends, just to name a few.
It is also tracking warehouse operation in both RF and non-RF environments, or a combination of the two.
Microsoft Azure is highly scalable and flexible. You can quickly scale up or down additional resources and computing power.
You have no longer upfront investments for hardware. You only pay for the use of your computing power, storage space, or services.
The uptime that can be achieved and guaranteed is very important for our company. This includes the rapid maintenance for security updates that are mostly carried out by Microsoft.
The wide range of capabilities of services that are possible in Microsoft Azure. You can practically put or create anything in Microsoft Azure.
The cost of resources is difficult to determine, technical documentation is frequently out of date, and documentation and mapping capabilities are lacking.
The documentation needs to be improved, and some advanced configuration options require research and experimentation.
Microsoft's licensing scheme is too complex for the average user, and Azure SQL syntax is too different from traditional SQL.
I use it every day and can't see a reason why I would stop unless I started a new job. If I were to leave my present position, the new job would be much more attractive if they were Eclipse users.
Moving to Azure was and still is an organizational strategy and not simply changing vendors. Our product roadmap revolved around Azure as we are in the business of humanitarian relief and Azure and Microsoft play an important part in quickly and efficiently serving all of the world. Migration and investment in Azure should be considered as an overall strategy of an organization and communicated companywide.
This is very easy to use for someone that hasn't ever used the system before. Despite any preconceived notions about how a system should function they can learn this and become efficient with really not a lot of effort. I have used many systems and this is probably one of the easiest I have ever had to learn to navigate and use.
As Microsoft Azure is [doing a] really good with PaaS. The need of a market is to have [a] combo of PaaS and IaaS. While AWS is making [an] exceptionally well blend of both of them, Azure needs to work more on DevOps and Automation stuff. Apart from that, I would recommend Azure as a great platform for cloud services as scale.
I haven't experienced any outages in the two years I have been using the system. It is always available as long as the computer is up. The only time I have seen it not be available was on occasions where we lost internet, or power and then we lost access to everything, not just Epicor Eclipse.
Everything in this system moves fairly quickly, that may be in part because we are a small company with only 21 users on the system at a time, or it may just be a the way the Epicor Eclipse works for any size company with any number of users. I can only speak for what I know and say that it is fast for our purposes.
The tier 1 support is trying, and sometimes they are successful. Sometimes they aren't. This topic isn't as black and white as the questions might suggest. Currently their Tier 1 support team is over seas, all items automatically go to Tier 1 and then when they can't help they either escalate it or tell me they need to check with someone else and they will get back to me. If they escalate me to Tier 2, then the issue comes back to the States and the support is usually at a higher knowledge/experience level and it can get resolved fairly quickly. If they don't escalate, then it might take weeks and multiple follow ups on my part before I either get a satisfactory resolution or finally get escalated.
We were running Windows Server and Active Directory, so [Microsoft] Azure was a seamless transition. We ran into a few, if any support issues, however, the availability of Microsoft Azure's support team was more than willing and able to guide us through the process. They even proposed solutions to issues we had not even thought of!
The training classes that I have attended have been top notch. The presenters are extremely knowledgeable on their subject matter, including real-world application of the system. They aren't just software techs training end users, they seem to be end users that have become experts in the over functionality and capabilities of the system.
The on-line training is very good, and it is taught by the same people that do the live in-person training sessions. The difficult part of it is, asking questions about your specific company's nuances or special circumstances. I don't remember if you can access the on-line training sessions after you have taken them for reminders purposes, but if so that is a great asset.
I don't really know about the implementation, it was back in 1998 and I didn't start here until 2016. By the time I started here they had been running it for a number of years and most of the people that were here when it was implemented are no longer here, and the ones that are don't really have much to say about how the implementation went either bad or good.
As I have mentioned before the issue with my Oracle Mismatch Version issues that have put a delay on moving one of my platforms will justify my 7 rating.
Most of my experience has been with Epicor's Prophet 21. For most distribution verticals, Prophet 21 is the only way to go. The comparison I've drawn is this: Prophet 21 is like a ferrari. Epicor Eclipse is like a reliable donkey. Both get you from point A to point B but Prophet 21 is going to get you there much quicker and with the kind of insight into your business that will help you thrive.
As I continue to evaluate the "big three" cloud providers for our clients, I make the following distinctions, though this gap continues to close. AWS is more granular, and inherently powerful in the configuration options compared to [Microsoft] Azure. It is a "developer" platform for cloud. However, Azure PowerShell is helping close this gap. Google Cloud is the leading containerization platform, largely thanks to it building kubernetes from the ground up. Azure containerization is getting better at having the same storage/deployment options.
I don't really know about the scalability. It's the same as it was when I started, I do know that you can buy more user licenses, but I think they come in packs of 5, which can be a problem if you only need 1 and will never use the other 4. But, again I'm not sure on that.
One of the main positive ROI impacts has been the constant upgrading and adding of new features to keep the software user friendly, relative, and robust.
Our credit manager has said it has made their job easier with daily reports to catch pricing discrepancies and straighten out before they go to invoice makes us look better.
With the addition of sale analytics it has given our sales force tools and new approaches to our customer base which has raised profitability.
For about 2 years we didn't have to do anything with our production VMs, the system ran without a hitch, which meant our engineers could focus on features rather than infrastructure.
DNS management was very easy in Azure, which made it easy to upgrade our cluster with zero downtime.
Azure Web UI was easy to work with and navigate, which meant our senior engineers and DevOps team could work with Azure without formal training.