ETO Software is a legacy case management solution supported by Social Solutions, acquired by Bonterra, and later sold as Bonterra ETO. The application is not the company's current case management solution.
N/A
Sage HRMS
Score9.8 out of 10
N/A
Sage HRMS is an HR management solution that integrates payroll, benefits, recruiting, employee self-service, and analytics capabilities.
N/A
Pricing
ETO Software (legacy)
Sage HRMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ETO Software (legacy)
Sage HRMS
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
Required
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
ETO Software (legacy)
Sage HRMS
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of ETO Software (legacy) and Sage HRMS
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
5.5
9 Ratings
39% below category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
8.08 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
1.39 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
7.99 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
1.27 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of ETO Software (legacy) and Sage HRMS
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
4.8
7 Ratings
52% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
6.17 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
4.04 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
6.92 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
2.16 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
3.06 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
3.27 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of ETO Software (legacy) and Sage HRMS
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
1.2
7 Ratings
149% below category average
Approval workflow
00 Ratings
1.26 Ratings
Balance details
00 Ratings
1.27 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
00 Ratings
1.06 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of ETO Software (legacy) and Sage HRMS
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
3.9
8 Ratings
72% below category average
View and generate pay and benefit information
00 Ratings
4.18 Ratings
Update personal information
00 Ratings
4.27 Ratings
View company policy documentation
00 Ratings
1.16 Ratings
Employee recognition
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
View job history
00 Ratings
4.05 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of ETO Software (legacy) and Sage HRMS
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
7.0
2 Ratings
14% below category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of ETO Software (legacy) and Sage HRMS
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
3.7
8 Ratings
69% below category average
Report builder
00 Ratings
2.07 Ratings
Pre-built reports
00 Ratings
1.28 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of ETO Software (legacy) and Sage HRMS
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
7.0
4 Ratings
14% below category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of ETO Software (legacy) and Sage HRMS
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
7.3
2 Ratings
11% below category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of ETO Software (legacy) and Sage HRMS
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
7.8
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of ETO Software (legacy) and Sage HRMS
Feature
ETO Software (legacy)
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
8.5
1 Ratings
7% above category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of ETO Software (legacy) and Sage HRMS
ETO Social Solutions should be avoided until they start caring about the problems generated by their software. In regards specifically to the ARMS suite utilized by the entire state of California, until the ETO software learns how to speak with SOMS, and unless it can be customized by knowledgeable people who consult with front-line users. It is not appropriate to provide the state legislature with bad data. I have 6 years of experience with it and I have multiple sources of agreement from fellow users throughout the state.
Sage HRMS is a software that fits in all organizations whether small or large and this makes it the most suitable HR solution as it will help you manage your workforce even if it may appear small. The software has analytics and reporting tools that are applicable in performance management where you will use them in assessing the productivity of your employees and plan on how to improve further as a workforce. It further helps in employee on-boarding, payroll management, and talent management
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
ETO's customization allows for the use of so many different and unique applications.
The ability to build extremely customized reports also allows us to get very detail oriented results or very broad building wide stats.
The additional added features such as workflow, referrals, and ETO Engage are useful in their own way and add more ways to better track and record data while simplifying some end-user processes.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The user interface is not intuitive and exceptionally difficult for non-tech savvy people to learn.
The system is not as customizable as we were led to believe at the initial purchase.
The system does not interface well with other systems. Organizationally we are moving towards data integration, and we will likely replace ETO because of this limitation.
Considering the limitations of the system, the cost is quite high. We've seen only marginal benefits of this system over pen and paper, and the ROI is not promising.
The initial build process was very frustrating. We didn't understand what the developer was billing us for. Something like simple touchpoint forms was billed for more hours than it would seem to require.
A system like this should be both fully mobile compatible and have offline functionality.
We would benefit from more nuanced security settings.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Social Solutions has been great for our organization. It has allowed us to not only report on data, but to dive into it to see trends and give snapshots of the current status of our neighbors. Social Solutions has been helpful in getting us to see additional ways we can use our data and ways that it is easier for front line staff to use this tool
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
I do not work with this software anymore, and I am not involved with the renewal of it. However, if I were, I would still suggest using it unless something better was introduced
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
As a technically savvy person with experience learning new database software systems I find ETO relatively straightforward now that I've been trained in it's use. However, many of our staff are less technically savvy and the learning curve for ETO can be grueling for many, who require frequent troubleshooting and support from me. Additionally, there are small quality of life improvements that would increase usability even for me - such as allowing multiple tabs to be open simultaneously or being able to use the browser's "back" and "forward" buttons.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Routine maintenance is announced with plenty of lead time, and the few times I've been unable to log in to the system properly a simple refresh was all that was required to fix.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Mostly really strong now, although I understand that for some years before switching their hosting service to AWS performance was a real issue with ETO and we had frequent problems with pages timing out or other glitches stemming from performance issues. With AWS that is mostly a thing of the past, although it is still a major issue with the reporting tool which is unable to run reports on the entire database due to performance limitations, instead requiring admins to define universes prior to running queries.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We love the first tier customer support folks! They're friendly, helpful, and knowledgeable within the scope of their position. The experiences we've had with their supervisors have also been mostly good and again they seem to be doing what they can within the scope of their positions. This is what prevents me from selecting 1. Unfortunately, none of these wonderful folks can offer real solutions when things are actually broken. They verify there's a problem and send it to the black hole called "the developers". After that, we don't hear anything useful and we figure out how to live with/work around the problem ourselves. (Requests for updates typically get "still with the developer" responses.) This is highly frustrating given that most of our issues are basic system issues (functionality that worked then broke after an update by Social Solutions, servers not syncing, report universes not flattening automatically, etc.). All we want is for the system to work as designed and to be fixed in a timely fashion when it doesn't. Apparently, that's too much to ask. (And no, we don't expect it to happen instantly, programming and quality control checks obviously take time.)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Really good trainer and exhaustive curriculum covered, but ETO is a complex enough system that you don't *really* know how to use it until you've been in the trenches for a few weeks. For instance, I took a Report Writing training and emerged with some fluency in the reports interface and a vague understanding of the process, but immediately encountered a legion of instance-specific idiosyncrasies that would have been totally impossible to address in a webinar training for a dozen folks from different orgs working in different instances.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Hard to say, as I was not with the agency at the time. However, based on our use of the software ~5years later I can say that there were no catastrophic design choices made during implementation that have become unduly burdensome as we've scaled up.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
When we made our decision several years ago Social Solutions had just acquired Apricot. At that time it was recommended to use ETO based off our revenue stream. However, it seems like Social Solutions has put in a lot more time and effort into Apricot over ETO and it seems more modern and user friendly. I think it is worth a second look once our contract expires
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Sage HRMS was very cost effective for a non-profit. It does all that we needed as a company and more. It also allows us to handle payroll ourselves instead of outsourcing [it].
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The core product scales well, and we've grown quite a bit as an agency during our use of ETO. However, there are some real pain points particularly around creating new programs and managing report universes that require extensive offline checklist resources and a full-spectrum understanding of how changing settings in one part of ETO can have downstream impact in other areas. This can introduce a "chilling" effect on proposed changes to the system, where there is strong incentive to leave things as-is to avoid unforeseen consequences.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I would say that at this point the overall ROI has been negative as we aren't getting much more out of our data by the switch we made to ETO, but the cost is much higher. I anticipate that will change as we get better at using ETO.
Most users that have switched to ETO in our organization prefer it to what they were using before and some are more appreciative of the value they can get from the data.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info